Pith. Sign in

RECORD

The Boundary Weyl Anomaly in the ${\cal N}=4$ SYM/Type IIB Supergravity Correspondence

High Energy Physics - Theory · Submitted 4 Nov 2003

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim The correct matching with the CFT result is thus a highly non-trivial test of the correspondence.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDhep-th/0311021 (version 1)
Pith IDIRJH6VHT, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationDavid Nolland, Paul Mansfield, Tatsuya Ueno. "The Boundary Weyl Anomaly in the ${\cal N}=4$ SYM/Type IIB Supergravity Correspondence." arXiv:hep-th/0311021 (2003). https://pith.science/paper/IRJH6VHT
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,987 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.07 · states limitation 0.12 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.07 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.08 · compares with prior results 0.65 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We give a complete account of the Schr\"odinger representation approach to the calculation of the Weyl anomaly of ${\cal N}=4$ SYM from the AdS/CFT correspondence. On the AdS side, the $1/N^2$ correction to the leading order result receives contributions from all the fields of Type IIB Supergravity, the contribution of each field being given by a universal formula. The correct matching with the CFT result is thus a highly non-trivial test of the correspondence.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We give a complete account of the Schr\"odinger representation approach to the calculation of the Weyl anomaly of ${\cal N}=4$ SYM from the AdS/CFT correspondence. contribution 0.97 0.92 0.16 asserted 1.00
s1 On the AdS side, the $1/N^2$ correction to the leading order result receives contributions from all the fields of Type IIB Supergravity, the contribution of each field being given by a universal formula. result 0.92 0.74 0.16 asserted 1.00
s2 The correct matching with the CFT result is thus a highly non-trivial test of the correspondence. interpretation 0.99 0.25 0.25 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.97 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We give a complete account of the Schr\"odinger representation approach to the calculation of the Weyl anomaly of ${\cal N}=4$ SYM from the AdS/CFT correspondence. On the AdS side, the $1/N^2$ correction to the leading order result receives contributions from all the fields of Type IIB Supergravity, the contribution of each field being given by a universal formula. The correct matching with the CFT result is thus a highly non-trivial test of the correspondence.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

8 arXiv papers cite this in 12 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 10 sentences without a confident label

Uses its method or tool 1 paper
Cites it as background 1 paper

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.