Supersymmetric D-branes and calibrations on general N=1 backgrounds

Luca Martucci; Paul Smyth

REVIEW

Supersymmetric D-branes and calibrations on general N=1 backgrounds

Luca Martucci, Paul Smyth

High Energy Physics - Theory · Submitted 11 Jul 2005 · 32 references

Pith's verdict: A clean organizing result for generalized calibrations with RR flux, with the calibration half resting on the authors' own rederivation of the background equations rather than a published source.

T0 · AI review

How this review was made: An AI referee (selfhosted/deepseek-v4.1-flash) read the paper on October 29, 2026 and answered a fixed list of questions about it. T0 is the starting level every paper gets. The levels describe how deeply Pith has checked the paper, never the authors.

T0 AI review An AI read the paper and answered a fixed list of questions.
T1 Audit Automatic checks that the references and files the paper relies on exist and match.
T2 Compute The paper's code or calculations re-run with the same results.
T3 Formal statement The claims written out in a formal math language a computer can read.
T4 Proof Those claims proved, and the proof checked by computer.

How Pith checks papers →

· 1 major objection · 6 minor · Ask about this paper · The compiled record · Read the full review →

Challenge this review Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗

Cite ▾

arXiv IDhep-th/0507099 (version 3)

Pith IDTKRIEGOR, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review

CitationLuca Martucci, Paul Smyth. "Supersymmetric D-branes and calibrations on general N=1 backgrounds." arXiv:hep-th/0507099 (2005). https://pith.science/paper/TKRIEGOR

Cite this reviewBibTeX for Pith's review of this paper

Claim paper

Why Pith says this

Highlight any text to comment on it.

Editor's note

read the letter

This is the paper that closes the loop on generalized calibrations for D-branes with RR flux. Koerber did the NS-only case, Gomis-Marchesano-Mateos did IIB SU(3), and this does the general SU(3)xSU(3) N=1 case: the kappa-symmetry conditions split cleanly into a geometric piece (generalized complex submanifold with respect to the integrable pure spinor) and a stability piece (saturation of the bound built from the non-integrable one). The calibration form (6.11), with the internal RR potentials included, is the concrete new object, and the mirror compatibility (2.19) is a real check rather than decoration. The SU(3) reduction (5.4)-(5.7) landing exactly on the known CY results of [7] is the kind of consistency evidence I actually weight. The geometric half is solid. Section 4's identification via (4.1)-(4.6) rests only on the kappa-symmetry algebra (3.9) and Gualtieri's definitions, and I would trust it without re-deriving. The calibration half is where I would push. The stress-test is right that d_H omega = 0 in (6.12) is just the real part of (2.15), so the calibration is not independent evidence for the background equations. The paper says so openly and cites [29], and the physical content comes from the kappa-symmetry side, so this is a feature rather than a circularity. But it does mean the calibration claim is only as good as (2.15), and (2.15) is the authors' own rederivation after footnote 4 flags sign errors in [2]. Appendix B stops at 'making some manipulations ... the Clifford map allows one to write this equation in the form (2.15)' without displaying the last step, and the relative sign of the F-tilde term is exactly what (6.12) needs. I would want that step written out. That said, the sign is not free: it is pinned by the SU(3) limit matching [7] and by the mirror exchange, so I doubt it is wrong, only under-shown. Two smaller things. The step after (6.6), that saturation of the Schwarz bound plus generalized-complex-submanifold implies (3.16)/(3.17), is asserted in one line; it is true but deserves a sentence of argument. And (6.9) is quoted from DBI plus Chern-Simons, which is standard and not really a soft spot. Who should read it: anyone working on generalized geometry and flux compactifications, and anyone who needs a citable statement of the calibration condition with RR flux turned on.

Referee report

Significance

This is a clean, correct, and useful synthesis that ties together three strands: the pure-spinor description of N=1 flux vacua, the generalized-complex-submanifold characterization of supersymmetric branes, and the generalized-calibration energy bound. The derivation from kappa-symmetry (3.9) to (3.11)-(3.12) is algebraic and checkable, and the Schwarz-inequality argument (6.4)-(6.6) is a standard and appropriate calibration technique. Two features deserve explicit credit: the mirror-covariant formulation, which is a genuine structural result rather than a cosmetic observation, and the alternative globally defined calibration ˆω in (6.18), which resolves the RR gauge-dependence of ω noted in (6.15) and gives a physical reading of the imaginary part of the background equation. The reduction (5.4)-(5.7) connects sensibly to the known no-flux results of [7] and to the IIB discussion of [8]. The paper is appropriately scoped: it restricts to spacetime-filling branes (stated after (3.8)), assumes |a|=|b| (3.8), and flags the sign errors in [2] in footnote 4.

Major objections (1)

[Appendix B, Eqs. (B.13) and (2.15)] The final step from (B.13) to (2.15) is asserted (''making some manipulations ... the Clifford map allows one to write this equation in the form (2.15)'') rather than displayed. This matters because the d_H-closure of ω in (6.12) is exactly the real part of (2.15) with |a|=|b|, so the relative sign between the dΨ term and the F̃ term in (2.15) is load-bearing for the headline calibration claim. Please display the last Clifford-map step, or at minimum the relative sign between the dΨ and F̃ contributions, so that a reader can verify (6.12) directly from the text. I note the mitigating circumstance that footnote 4 reports the sign corrections were confirmed by the authors of [2], so this is a transparency and verifiability request rather than a challenge to the correctness of the result; the fix is a single displayed equation.

Minor objections (6)

[Section 5, Eq. (5.3)] The definition ''ab* ≡ e^{iτ}'' appears inconsistent with (5.2) and (5.5). With |a|=|b|, ab* = |a|^2 e^{i(α−β)} = |a|^2 e^{iφ}, so τ would equal φ, whereas (5.5) uses e^{iτ} as the phase multiplying Ω, which from (5.2) is the phase of ab, not ab*. The intended definition is presumably ab ≡ |a|^2 e^{iτ}; please correct or clarify.
[Conclusions, p. 17] The displayed condition ''{Im(P[iΨ]) ∧ F}(n) = 0'' should read ''{Im(iP[Ψ]) ∧ e^F}(n) = 0'', to match (3.14)-(3.15) and to include the worldvolume flux exponent.
[Section 2 and Section 6] The notation Ψ1/Ψ2 introduced in (2.16)-(2.17) and the notation Ψ± used elsewhere are not always easy to track; a short dictionary near (6.11) restating which pure spinor enters ω_IIA and ω_IIB would help the reader.
[Section 6, Eq. (6.3)] The deformation argument assumes the existence of a chain B and a field strength F̂ on it with dF̂ = P_B[H] and the correct restrictions to Σ and Σ′. This is implicit; stating it explicitly, together with the orientation convention used for the inequality, would make the minimality argument self-contained.
[Section 3, after Eq. (3.7)] The statement that the q=0 case (an effective four-dimensional particle) can never be supersymmetric is asserted without derivation. A one-line justification from the consistency of (3.6)-(3.7) and the reality conditions would help the reader.
[Section 6, after Eq. (6.11)] Given the emphasis on ''stability'', it would be worth stating explicitly that the calibration bound is a rephrasing of the background equations (2.15) and (2.18), not independent evidence for them. The paper is honest about this and cites [29], but one sentence making the logical status explicit would preempt a natural misreading.

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

The paper

The paper claims

Supersymmetric D-branes in flux backgrounds are exactly the branes that saturate a single generalised calibration bound.

The reading

The paper asks which D-branes can preserve supersymmetry when the ten-dimensional background is a warped four-dimensional Minkowski space times a six-dimensional internal space carrying both Neveu-Schwarz and Ramond-Ramond flux, with only $N=1$ supersymmetry surviving in four dimensions. The authors show that the kappa-symmetry condition for a spacetime-filling brane splits cleanly into two statements, each carried by one of the two pure spinors that define the $SU(3)times SU(3)$ structure of the internal space. One statement is geometric: the brane must wrap a generalised complex submanifold with respect to the integrable generalised complex structure. The other is a stability statement, and the pair together is equivalent to a single calibration condition in which the brane saturates a bound set by a form built from the non-integrable pure spinor and the internal Ramond-Ramond potentials. If this holds, the background supersymmetry equations acquire a physical reading: they are precisely the statement that such a calibration exists, and the same logic runs in type IIA and type IIB under the exchange of the two pure spinors.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the pair of $O(6,6)$ pure spinors $Psi_{+}$ and $Psi_{-}$ built from the two internal spinors $eta^{(1)}_{+}$ and $eta^{(2)}_{+}$, together with the generalised calibration $omega$ of equation (6.11): $omega_{IIA} = e^{4A}[mathrm{Re}(-8i|a|^{-2}e^{-Phi}Psi_{-}) - sum_k tilde{C}^{(2k+1)}]$ and its type IIB analogue with $Psi_{+}$ and even potentials. The work is done by the observation that $d_H omega = 0$ is exactly equivalent to the background supersymmetry equations (2.15) and (2.18) once the two internal spinors have equal norm. That equivalence is what turns a technical statement about Killing spinors into a statement about which branes minimise their energy, and it is what makes the non-integrable pure spinor the natural carrier of the stability condition: the Ramond-Ramond flux obstructs its integrability in exactly the way needed to cancel the flux terms in the calibration.

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that for four-dimensional spacetime-filling D-branes on a general type II $N=1$ background with $SU(3)times SU(3)$ structure and Ramond-Ramond flux, the kappa-symmetry conditions are equivalent to two things at once. First, the brane wraps a generalised complex submanifold with respect to the integrable generalised complex structure $J_{-}$ (type IIB, even cycles) or $J_{+}$ (type IIA, odd cycles), which is the content of equation (4.4) together with the reflection condition (4.6) defining a generalised submanifold. Second, the brane saturates the bound defined by the form $omega$ of equation (6.11), which is $d_H$-closed by virtue of the background equations (2.15) and (2.18); the closure statement is equation (6.12). The two pieces are packaged in the single conditions (3.16) and (3.17), $mathrm{Re}(-iP[Psi_{pm}])wedge e^{F}$ proportional to the worldvolume volume form, which also fix the orientation of the brane. In the $SU(3)$ subcase the calibration reduces to the familiar combinations of $e^{-iJ}$ and $Omega$ in (6.13), recovering holomorphic branes with $(1,1)$ field strength in type IIB and coisotropic branes in type IIA.

Load-bearing premise

The whole calibration claim rests on the authors' own rederivation in Appendix B of the background supersymmetry equations (2.15) and (2.18), because the $d_H$-closure of $omega$ is exactly equivalent to those equations and the authors themselves report sign mistakes in the corresponding published equations of the reference they build on.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

A supersymmetric spacetime-filling brane in such a background is automatically a minimal-energy configuration among branes in its deformation class, since saturation of a $d_H$-closed calibration bound gives the chain argument of equation (6.3).
The condition that the brane wrap a generalised complex submanifold can be checked using only the integrable pure spinor, separating the geometry question from the flux-dependent stability question.
In the $SU(3)$ subcase the results reduce to the known Calabi-Yau conditions of [7], now modified by dilaton, warp factor and flux, so the generalisation can be tested against established holomorphic- and coisotropic-cycle results.
Because equations (3.16) and (3.17) are exchanged under $Psi_{+} leftrightarrow Psi_{-}$ together with $F_A leftrightarrow F_B$, the brane conditions preserve the generalised mirror symmetry relating the type IIA and type IIB backgrounds, exchanging even and odd cycles and their calibrations.
Considering branes filling only two or three flat directions, the existence of calibrations for effective strings and domain walls becomes equivalent to the real and imaginary parts of the background equations (2.15), giving each of those equations a physical interpretation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The logic can be run backwards as a consistency check: any proposed set of corrected background supersymmetry equations should imply $d_H$-closure of some explicit form built from the pure spinors, and a failure of that closure is a cheap way to detect sign or normalisation errors.
The mirror exchange of calibrations in (6.14), written on untwisted potentials as $sum_k tilde{C}^{(2k)}wedge e^{B} leftrightarrow sum_k tilde{C}^{(2k+1)}wedge e^{B}$, looks like the T-duality rule for Ramond-Ramond potentials, which suggests the calibration statement may be the geometric shadow of a worldsheet-level statement rather than a coincidental algebraic symmetry.
Because the calibration is not globally defined when Ramond-Ramond potentials are present, the alternative object $hat{omega} = -8e^{4A-Phi}|a|^{-2}mathrm{Re}(iPsi)$ in (6.18) is the better-defined quantity to carry to global questions, at the cost of a non-zero $d_H hat{omega}$ proportional to the internal flux.
If the correspondence between background equations and calibrations is exact, one expects the same pattern for backgrounds with less supersymmetry or with $SU(2)$ structure, where the calibration would be built from the corresponding pair of pure spinors; that extension is not attempted here.

Original abstract

We study the conditions to have supersymmetric D-branes on general {\cal N}=1 backgrounds with Ramond-Ramond fluxes. These conditions can be written in terms of the two pure spinors associated to the SU(3)\times SU(3) structure on T_M\oplus T^\star_M, and can be split into two parts each involving a different pure spinor. The first involves the integrable pure spinor and requires the D-brane to wrap a generalised complex submanifold with respect to the generalised complex structure associated to it. The second contains the non-integrable pure spinor and is related to the stability of the brane. The two conditions can be rephrased as a generalised calibration condition for the brane. The results preserve the generalised mirror symmetry relating the type IIA and IIB backgrounds considered, giving further evidence for this duality.

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged, kept beside the review and separate from it. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,959 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.08 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.01 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.03 · compares with prior results 0.11 · mentions code or data availability 0.01.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v3. Results and the main claim are underlined; show every role.

We study the conditions to have supersymmetric D-branes on general {\cal N}=1 backgrounds with Ramond-Ramond fluxes. These conditions can be written in terms of the two pure spinors associated to the SU(3)\times SU(3) structure on T_M\oplus T^\star_M, and can be split into two parts each involving a different pure spinor. The first involves the integrable pure spinor and requires the D-brane to wrap a generalised complex submanifold with respect to the generalised complex structure associated to it. The second contains the non-integrable pure spinor and is related to the stability of the brane. The two conditions can be rephrased as a generalised calibration condition for the brane. The results preserve the generalised mirror symmetry relating the type IIA and IIB backgrounds considered, giving further evidence for this duality.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#	sentence	role	the authors' own work	states the main conclusion	strength
s0	We study the conditions to have supersymmetric D-branes on general {\cal N}=1 backgrounds with Ramond-Ramond fluxes.	contribution 0.95	0.91	0.07	asserted 0.79
s1	These conditions can be written in terms of the two pure spinors associated to the SU(3)\times SU(3) structure on T_M\oplus T^\star_M, and can be split into two parts each involving a different pure spinor.	result 0.47	0.84	0.14	asserted 0.92
s2	The first involves the integrable pure spinor and requires the D-brane to wrap a generalised complex submanifold with respect to the generalised complex structure associated to it.	result 0.96	0.81	0.16	asserted 1.00
s3	The second contains the non-integrable pure spinor and is related to the stability of the brane.	result 0.85	0.80	0.08	asserted 0.98
s4	The two conditions can be rephrased as a generalised calibration condition for the brane.	result 0.57	0.87	0.42	asserted 0.99
s5	The results preserve the generalised mirror symmetry relating the type IIA and IIB backgrounds considered, giving further evidence for this duality.	interpretation 0.95	0.76	0.23	asserted 0.84

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.99.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read

arXiv listing abstract v3

not examined

full text
figures and tables
references and citing sentences
relations to other papers

levels run

P abstract

not run

S sections
T body sentences
C citations
R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

References

Works cited (32)

[7]

M. Marino, R. Minasian, G. W. Moore and A. Strominger, “Nonlinear instantons from supersymmetric p-branes,” JHEP 0001 (2000) 005 [ hep-th/9911206]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2000
[29]

J. P. Gauntlett, N. w. Kim, D. Martelli and D. Waldram, “Fivebran es wrapped on SLAG three-cycles and related geometry,” JHEP 0111 (2001) 018 [ hep-th/0110034]; J. P. Gauntlett, D. Martelli, S. Pakis and D. Waldram, “G-structure s and wrapped NS5-branes,” Commun. Math. Phys. 247 (2004) 421 [ hep-th/0205050]; J. P. Gauntlett, D. Martelli and D. Waldram, “S...

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2001
[2]

M. Grana, R. Minasian, M. Petrini and A. Tomasiello, “Generalised s tructures of N = 1 vacua,” JHEP 0511 (2005) 020 [ hep-th/0505212]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2005
[8]

J. Gomis, F. Marchesano and D. Mateos, “An open string landsca pe,” JHEP 0511 (2005) 021 hep-th/0506179

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2005
[1]

M. Grana, R. Minasian, M. Petrini and A. Tomasiello, “Supersymme tric backgrounds from generalised Calabi-Yau manifolds,” JHEP 0408 (2004) 046 [ hep-th/0406137]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2004
[3]

N. Hitchin, “Generalised Calabi-Yau manifolds,” Quart. J. Math. Ox ford Ser. 54 (2003) 281 [math.dg/0209099]

View on Pith arXiv 2003
[4]

M. Gualtieri, “Generalised complex geometry,” Oxford University P hD Thesis, [math.dg/0401221]

View on Pith arXiv
[5]

C. Jeschek and F. Witt, “Generalised G(2)-structures and typ e IIB superstrings,” JHEP 0503 (2005) 053 [ hep-th/0412280]; F. Witt, “Generalised G2-manifolds,” [ math.dg/0411642]; F. Witt, “Special metric structures and closed forms,” [ math.dg/0502443]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2005
[6]

K. Becker, M. Becker and A. Strominger, “Five-branes, membr anes and nonperturbative string theory,” Nucl. Phys. B 456 (1995) 130 [ hep-th/9507158]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1995
[9]

M. Grana and J. Polchinski, “Supersymmetric three-form ﬂux pe rturbations on AdS(5),” Phys. Rev. D 63 (2001) 026001 [ hep-th/0009211]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2001
[10]

P. Koerber, “Stable D-branes, calibrations and generalised Ca labi-Yau geometry,” JHEP 0508 (2005) 099 [ hep-th/0506154

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2005
[11]

A. Kapustin, “Topological strings on noncommutative manifolds ,” Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys. 1 (2004) 49 [ hep-th/0310057]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2004
[12]

M. Zabzine, “Geometry of D-branes for general N = (2,2) sigma models,” Lett. Math. Phys. 70 (2004) 211 [ hep-th/0405240]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2004
[13]

R. Zucchini,“Generalized complex geometry, generalized branes and the Hitchin sigma model,” JHEP 0503 (2005) 022 [ hep-th/0501062]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2005
[14]

A. Kapustin and Y. Li, “Open string BRST cohomology for genera lized complex branes,” [hep-th/0501071]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[15]

A. Kapustin, “A-branes and noncommutative geometry,” [ hep-th/0502212]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[16]

D. Lust and D. Tsimpis, “Supersymmetric AdS(4) compactiﬁcat ions of IIA supergravity,” JHEP 0502 (2005) 027 [ hep-th/0412250]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2005
[17]

S. Fidanza, R. Minasian and A. Tomasiello, “Mirror symmetric SU(3 )-structure manifolds with NS ﬂuxes,” Commun. Math. Phys. 254 (2005) 401 [ hep-th/0311122]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2005
[18]

O. Ben-Bassat, “Mirror symmetry and generalized complex man ifolds,” [ math.ag/0405303]

View on Pith arXiv
[19]

C. Jeschek, “Generalized Calabi-Yau structures and mirror sy mmetry,” [hep-th/0406046]; S. Chiantese, F. Gmeiner and C. Jeschek, “Mirror symmetry for to pological sigma models with generalized Kaehler geometry,” [ hep-th/0408169]. – 21 –

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[20]

P. Grange and R. Minasian, “Modiﬁed pure spinors and mirror sym metry,” [hep-th/0412086]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[21]

A. Tomasiello, “Topological mirror symmetry with ﬂuxes,” JHEP 0506 (2005) 067 [hep-th/0502148]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2005
[22]

M. Grana, J. Louis and D. Waldram, “Hitchin functionals in N = 2 sup ergravity,” [hep-th/0505264]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[23]

M. Cederwall, A. von Gussich, B. E. W. Nilsson, P. Sundell and A. W esterberg, “The Dirichlet super-p-branes in ten-dimensional type IIA and IIB supe rgravity,” Nucl. Phys. B 490 (1997) 179 [ hep-th/9611159]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1997
[24]

E. Bergshoeﬀ and P. K. Townsend, “Super D-branes,” Nucl. Ph ys. B 490 (1997) 145 [hep-th/9611173]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1997
[25]

D. Marolf, L. Martucci and P. J. Silva, “Fermions, T-duality and eﬀective actions for D-branes in bosonic backgrounds,” JHEP 0304 (2003) 051 [ hep-th/0303209]. D. Marolf, L. Martucci and P. J. Silva, “Actions and fermionic symme tries for D-branes in bosonic backgrounds,” JHEP 0307 (2003) 019 [ hep-th/0306066]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2003
[26]

L. Martucci, J. Rosseel, D. Van den Bleeken and A. Van Proeyen , “Dirac actions for D-branes on backgrounds with ﬂuxes,” Class. Quant. Grav. 22 (2005) 2745 [ hep-th/0504041]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2005
[27]

A. Kapustin and D. Orlov, “Remarks on A-branes, mirror symme try, and the Fukaya category,” J. Geom. Phys. 48 (2003) [ hep-th/0109098]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2003
[28]

J. Gutowski and G. Papadopoulos, “AdS calibrations,” Phys. Le tt. B 462 (1999) 81 [hep-th/9902034]. J. Gutowski, G. Papadopoulos and P. K. Townsend, “Supersymmet ry and generalised calibrations,” Phys. Rev. D 60 (1999) 106006 [ hep-th/9905156]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1999
[30]

J. F. G. Cascales and A. M. Uranga, “Branes on generalised calib rated sub-manifolds,” JHEP 0411 (2004) 083 [ hep-th/0407132]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2004
[31]

S. Gurrieri, J. Louis, A. Micu and D. Waldram, “Mirror symmetry in generalised Calabi-Yau compactiﬁcations,” Nucl. Phys. B 654 (2003) 61 [ hep-th/0211102]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2003
[32]

E. Bergshoeﬀ, R. Kallosh, T. Ortin, D. Roest and A. Van Proeye n, “New formulations of D = 10 supersymmetry and D8 - O8 domain walls,” Class. Quant. Grav. 18 (2001) 3359 [hep-th/0103233]. – 22 –

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2001

Forward citations

Cited by 24 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

All AdS_7 solutions of type II supergravity
hep-th 2013-09 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

Supersymmetric AdS7 x M3 solutions of type II supergravity are classified: none in IIB, and in massive IIA a family whose internal space is an S2 fibration over an interval, reducing the problem to two coupled ODEs.
Holographic two-point functions of heavy operators revisited
hep-th 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

Holographic two-point functions of heavy operators are reproduced by adding boundary terms to the D3-brane action and by the Gibbons-Hawking-York term in LLM backgrounds, but only in coordinate dependence and without ...
Quantum corrections to DGKT and the Weak Gravity Conjecture
hep-th 2024-11 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

Quantum corrections from gaugino condensation and D2 instantons lift the DGKT D4-brane moduli space, making the branes self-attractive and putting the vacuum in tension with the membrane WGC.
D6-branes and torsion
hep-th 2006-03 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

Torsional (co)homology classes of twisted tori explain why RR tadpoles shift, why D6-brane moduli are lifted, how the D-brane discretum appears, and how the Freed-Witten anomaly arises in type IIA flux vacua.
Twisted-Circle Compactifications of SQCD-like Theories and Holography
hep-th 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

New regular type IIB supergravity backgrounds are constructed for twisted-circle compactifications of SQCD-like theories, and their regularity forces the anomaly-free condition N_f = 2N_c.

Show 19 more citing papers

A Landscape of AdS Flux Vacua
hep-th 2019-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

A bilinear flux-axion polynomial technique yields new branches of type IIA Calabi-Yau flux vacua, including a tachyon-free non-supersymmetric AdS branch.
K\"ahler moduli stabilization from ten dimensions
hep-th 2019-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

In supersymmetric AdS4 string compactifications, the cosmological constant keeps the D7-brane four-cycle at finite size, and matching near and far from the brane reproduces, up to an undetermined coefficient, the KKLT...
Open problems on classical de Sitter solutions
hep-th 2019-02 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

The author derives new necessary conditions for classical de Sitter solutions in type II string theory but cannot prove any of the three standard conjectures, and identifies the parameter corners where counterexamples...
Refining the boundaries of the classical de Sitter landscape
hep-th 2016-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

Classical type II supergravity with parallel Op-planes and Dp-branes admits no de Sitter vacuum for p=3,7,8, and only a narrow curvature window for p=4,5,6.
6D microstate geometries from 10D structures
hep-th 2013-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

A general null-Killing-vector formalism yields the BPS equations for D1-D5-P microstates and an explicit nonlinear, circle-dependent solution claimed to be regular and asymptotically flat.
Zp charged branes in flux compactifications
hep-th 2012-11 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

Background fluxes in 4d string compactifications induce Z_p discrete gauge symmetries, realized as broken U(1) subgroups, under which wrapped branes carry charges conserved only modulo p.
G-flux in F-theory and algebraic cycles
hep-th 2011-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

Explicit four-form fluxes in F-theory are constructed from algebraic cycles in the Weierstrass model, with D3 tadpoles and chirality indices computed and matched to type IIB in weak coupling.
The Spectrum of Excitations of Holographic Wilson Loops
hep-th 2011-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

The excitation spectrum of the D3 brane dual to a half-BPS Wilson loop organizes into short multiplets of OSp(4*|4), with the fundamental string modes forming the ultra-short multiplet.
Generalized non-supersymmetric flux vacua
hep-th 2008-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

A classification of non-supersymmetric type II flux vacua by which D-branes remain BPS, yielding no-scale Minkowski examples and new AdS4 solutions.
M-theory, exceptional generalised geometry and superpotentials
hep-th 2008-04 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

N=1 M-theory backgrounds on seven-dimensional spaces are characterised by an element of the 912 representation of E_7(7), and the four-dimensional superpotential is an E_7(7)-invariant functional of this element.
From ten to four and back again: how to generalize the geometry
hep-th 2007-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

The ten-dimensional supersymmetry equations of warped SU(3)xSU(3) flux vacua are exactly the F- and D-flatness conditions of a Weyl-invariant four-dimensional N=1 supergravity, and non-perturbative corrections deform ...
Supersymmetric sources, integrability and generalized-structure compactifications
hep-th 2007-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

Orientifolds are compatible with dynamic SU(3)xSU(3)-structure, and source-corrected Einstein and dilaton equations follow from supersymmetry plus form Bianchi identities.
A scan for new N=1 vacua on twisted tori
hep-th 2006-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

The paper classifies N=1 Minkowski vacua of type II strings on compact nilmanifolds and solvmanifolds, finding a few new non-Calabi-Yau backgrounds that so far exist only as smeared large-volume solutions.
D-branes on general N=1 backgrounds: superpotentials and D-terms
hep-th 2006-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

A single universal superpotential, built from the background's integrable pure spinor, generates the F-flatness conditions for spacetime-filling D-branes on general N=1 flux backgrounds, while the D-flatness condition...
Towards the String Dual of N=1 SQCD-like Theories
hep-th 2006-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

Smeared flavor D5-branes are added to the Maldacena-Nunez background, producing a family of type IIB solutions whose BPS equations depend on Nf/Nc and which the authors argue describe N=1 SQCD with a quartic superpotential.
Stability of non-supersymmetric vacua from calibrations
hep-th 2025-07 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

Uses calibrations to protect examined non-supersymmetric AdS vacua in type II string theory from D-brane mediated decays, including abelian bound states.
Unquenched flavor in the gauge/gravity correspondence
hep-th 2010-02 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

Smeared flavor D-branes can be backreacted onto type II supergravity backgrounds, yielding tractable duals of gauge theories with dynamical fundamentals, at the price of a small flavor-loop expansion parameter.
The Swampland: Introduction and Review
hep-th 2019-03 accept novelty 2.0 of 10

The review organizes the Swampland conjectures, from the Weak Gravity Conjecture to the de Sitter conjecture, and assesses the string-theory and black-hole evidence for each.
Exploring String Theory Solutions: Black hole thermodynamics with $\alpha'$ corrections and type II compactifications
hep-th 2025-05 unverdicted novelty 1.0 of 10

A doctoral thesis restating published results on α'-corrected black holes in heterotic string theory and on type II flux compactifications, with no new standalone results.

How later papers used it

79 later papers cite it

Evidence: substantial. 63 of the citing papers share no author with it, and 15 of those carry a confident label from Pith's citation classifier.

Pith read 20 of the 198 citing sentences, choosing only those whose citation markers point at this paper alone, and wrote the paraphrases from them. The summary, the counts, the evidence level, the links and the quotes come from code; the summary counts the papers listed below. A later paper is listed under a label when Pith's citation classifier gives one of its sentences that label at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), Pith's reading finds that the citing paper itself did it, and a second check confirms the paraphrase against the sentence. This section lists uses only. It does not list criticism or disagreement, so their absence here says nothing about how the paper has been received. Papers that share an author with this one are listed apart, under "By the same authors". A quote is the citing authors' own sentence, shown when their paper's licence is CC BY, CC BY-SA or CC0. JSON

5 later papers by other authors are listed below: 5 used its method or tool and 1 used its data or values. 1 of them appears under more than one label. 1 more paper by the same authors is listed: 1 used its method or tool.

Uses its method or tool 6 of 21 papers with this label · 1 by the same authors

Employed the formalism developed in this paper and followed its notations.

Flavor brane on the baryonic branch of moduli space (2009) · 0.98 · paraphrased: the licence does not allow quoting
Let us now focus on calibrated generalized cycles, the ones saturating the bound [ref]: [equation] Using [ref], we therefore have [equation] We recover here the fact that a space-filling D$p$-brane wrapping a calibrated generalized cycle minimizes its energy within its generalized homology class [ref] .

Stability of non-supersymmetric vacua from calibrations (2025) · Space-filling (anti) Dp-brane stability · 0.80
Followed this paper to check when the D3 brane wrapping the two-cycle in the resolved cone is SUSY.

Emerging Non-Anomalous Baryonic Symmetries in the AdS_5/CFT_4 Correspondence (2011) · 0.99 · paraphrased: the licence does not allow quoting
Followed this paper to determine the criteria under which the D3 brane wrapping the two-cycle in the resolved cone is SUSY.

The AdS/CFT Correspondence and Symmetry Breaking (2011) · 0.91 · paraphrased: the licence does not allow quoting
Assumed an internal space with SU(3)xSU(3) structure and used the pure spinors to describe the manifold as in this paper.

Flux Compactifications, dS Vacua and the Swampland (2022) · 0.89 · paraphrased: the licence does not allow quoting

By the same authors

Introduced static supersymmetric probe D-branes on the backgrounds following the procedure based on kappa-symmetry of this paper.

D-branes on AdS flux compactifications (2007) (same authors) · 0.96 · paraphrased: the licence does not allow quoting

Uses its data or values 1 paper

Took alpha = +/-1 in its case from the discussion after (3.7) in this paper.

The AdS/CFT Correspondence and Symmetry Breaking (2011) · 0.90 · paraphrased: the licence does not allow quoting

How the literature uses it

77 arXiv papers cite this in 198 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 151 sentences without a confident label

Builds on it 1 paper

This observation can be easily extended to more general and less supersymmetric type II flux compactifications on generalized Calabi-Yau spaces [ref] .

Three-forms, dualities and membranes in four-dimensional supergravity · Introduction · 0.88

Uses its method or tool 21 papers

We explicitly compute the bosonic and fermionic fluctuations starting from the action for such a D3 brane as worked out by Martucci and collaborators [ref] .

The Spectrum of Excitations of Holographic Wilson Loops · Introduction · 0.98
Let us now introduce static supersymmetric probe D-branes on the backgrounds described in section [ref] following the procedure based on $κ$-symmetry of [ref] .

D-branes on AdS flux compactifications · Introducing supersymmetric D-branes · 0.96
In what follows we employ the formalism developed in [ref] and also follow the notations introduced there.

Flavor brane on the baryonic branch of moduli space · Kappa symmetry · 0.98

Uses its data or values 1 paper

In addition, from the discussion after (3.7) in [ref] , $α= ±1$ in our case.

The AdS/CFT Correspondence and Symmetry Breaking · D3 branes on the resolved cone and global strings · 0.90

Compares with it 2 papers

Comparing with the results of [ref] , we see that supersymmetric instantonic E-branes wrap exactly the same generalized calibrated cycles in the internal space as supersymmetric space-time filling branes, i.e. they satisfy the condition √((g|_Σ+))=.Ψ_1|_Σ∧e^|_top , while anti-instantonic E-branes have opposite orientation.

From ten to four and back again: how to generalize the geometry · Supersymmetric D-brane instantons in flux vacua · 0.99
Moreover, we show in both IIA and IIB that it can be interpreted as the existence of a generalized calibration, very similarly to the interpretation given in [ref] to the pure spinor equations in terms of D-branes.

Timelike structures of ten-dimensional supersymmetry · Introduction · 0.96

Cites it as background 15 papers

Here $J$ is the almost complex structure with respect to which the six-dimensional metric $g_mn$ is Hermitian and $Ω$ is a $(3,0)$-form constructed from the spinor as explained in [ref] .

The AdS/CFT Correspondence and Symmetry Breaking · D3 branes on the resolved cone and global strings · 0.91
Here $J$ is the almost complex structure with respect to which the six-dimensional metric $g_mn$ is Hermitian and $Ω$ is a $(3,0)$-form constructed from the spinor as explained in [ref] .

Emerging Non-Anomalous Baryonic Symmetries in the AdS_5/CFT_4 Correspondence · D3 branes on the resolved cone and global strings · 0.87
DGKT faces a number of largely unresolved issues, which have resulted in a lively literature on the topic, particularly in recent years (see [ref] ).

Quantum corrections to DGKT and the Weak Gravity Conjecture · What is weird about the DGKT solution? · 0.97

Discussion

Disagree with the review, or know something it missed? Leave a comment, highlight any passage above to comment on it, or challenge this review formally.

[1] [7]

M. Marino, R. Minasian, G. W. Moore and A. Strominger, “Nonlinear instantons from supersymmetric p-branes,” JHEP 0001 (2000) 005 [ hep-th/9911206]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2000

[2] [29]

J. P. Gauntlett, N. w. Kim, D. Martelli and D. Waldram, “Fivebran es wrapped on SLAG three-cycles and related geometry,” JHEP 0111 (2001) 018 [ hep-th/0110034]; J. P. Gauntlett, D. Martelli, S. Pakis and D. Waldram, “G-structure s and wrapped NS5-branes,” Commun. Math. Phys. 247 (2004) 421 [ hep-th/0205050]; J. P. Gauntlett, D. Martelli and D. Waldram, “S...

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2001

[3] [2]

M. Grana, R. Minasian, M. Petrini and A. Tomasiello, “Generalised s tructures of N = 1 vacua,” JHEP 0511 (2005) 020 [ hep-th/0505212]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2005

[4] [8]

J. Gomis, F. Marchesano and D. Mateos, “An open string landsca pe,” JHEP 0511 (2005) 021 hep-th/0506179

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2005

[5] [1]

M. Grana, R. Minasian, M. Petrini and A. Tomasiello, “Supersymme tric backgrounds from generalised Calabi-Yau manifolds,” JHEP 0408 (2004) 046 [ hep-th/0406137]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2004

[6] [3]

N. Hitchin, “Generalised Calabi-Yau manifolds,” Quart. J. Math. Ox ford Ser. 54 (2003) 281 [math.dg/0209099]

View on Pith arXiv 2003

[7] [4]

M. Gualtieri, “Generalised complex geometry,” Oxford University P hD Thesis, [math.dg/0401221]

View on Pith arXiv

[8] [5]

C. Jeschek and F. Witt, “Generalised G(2)-structures and typ e IIB superstrings,” JHEP 0503 (2005) 053 [ hep-th/0412280]; F. Witt, “Generalised G2-manifolds,” [ math.dg/0411642]; F. Witt, “Special metric structures and closed forms,” [ math.dg/0502443]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2005

[9] [6]

K. Becker, M. Becker and A. Strominger, “Five-branes, membr anes and nonperturbative string theory,” Nucl. Phys. B 456 (1995) 130 [ hep-th/9507158]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1995

[10] [9]

M. Grana and J. Polchinski, “Supersymmetric three-form ﬂux pe rturbations on AdS(5),” Phys. Rev. D 63 (2001) 026001 [ hep-th/0009211]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2001

[11] [10]

P. Koerber, “Stable D-branes, calibrations and generalised Ca labi-Yau geometry,” JHEP 0508 (2005) 099 [ hep-th/0506154

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2005

[12] [11]

A. Kapustin, “Topological strings on noncommutative manifolds ,” Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys. 1 (2004) 49 [ hep-th/0310057]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2004

[13] [12]

M. Zabzine, “Geometry of D-branes for general N = (2,2) sigma models,” Lett. Math. Phys. 70 (2004) 211 [ hep-th/0405240]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2004

[14] [13]

R. Zucchini,“Generalized complex geometry, generalized branes and the Hitchin sigma model,” JHEP 0503 (2005) 022 [ hep-th/0501062]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2005

[15] [14]

A. Kapustin and Y. Li, “Open string BRST cohomology for genera lized complex branes,” [hep-th/0501071]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[16] [15]

A. Kapustin, “A-branes and noncommutative geometry,” [ hep-th/0502212]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[17] [16]

D. Lust and D. Tsimpis, “Supersymmetric AdS(4) compactiﬁcat ions of IIA supergravity,” JHEP 0502 (2005) 027 [ hep-th/0412250]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2005

[18] [17]

S. Fidanza, R. Minasian and A. Tomasiello, “Mirror symmetric SU(3 )-structure manifolds with NS ﬂuxes,” Commun. Math. Phys. 254 (2005) 401 [ hep-th/0311122]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2005

[19] [18]

O. Ben-Bassat, “Mirror symmetry and generalized complex man ifolds,” [ math.ag/0405303]

View on Pith arXiv

[20] [19]

C. Jeschek, “Generalized Calabi-Yau structures and mirror sy mmetry,” [hep-th/0406046]; S. Chiantese, F. Gmeiner and C. Jeschek, “Mirror symmetry for to pological sigma models with generalized Kaehler geometry,” [ hep-th/0408169]. – 21 –

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[21] [20]

P. Grange and R. Minasian, “Modiﬁed pure spinors and mirror sym metry,” [hep-th/0412086]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[22] [21]

A. Tomasiello, “Topological mirror symmetry with ﬂuxes,” JHEP 0506 (2005) 067 [hep-th/0502148]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2005

[23] [22]

M. Grana, J. Louis and D. Waldram, “Hitchin functionals in N = 2 sup ergravity,” [hep-th/0505264]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[24] [23]

M. Cederwall, A. von Gussich, B. E. W. Nilsson, P. Sundell and A. W esterberg, “The Dirichlet super-p-branes in ten-dimensional type IIA and IIB supe rgravity,” Nucl. Phys. B 490 (1997) 179 [ hep-th/9611159]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1997

[25] [24]

E. Bergshoeﬀ and P. K. Townsend, “Super D-branes,” Nucl. Ph ys. B 490 (1997) 145 [hep-th/9611173]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1997

[26] [25]

D. Marolf, L. Martucci and P. J. Silva, “Fermions, T-duality and eﬀective actions for D-branes in bosonic backgrounds,” JHEP 0304 (2003) 051 [ hep-th/0303209]. D. Marolf, L. Martucci and P. J. Silva, “Actions and fermionic symme tries for D-branes in bosonic backgrounds,” JHEP 0307 (2003) 019 [ hep-th/0306066]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2003

[27] [26]

L. Martucci, J. Rosseel, D. Van den Bleeken and A. Van Proeyen , “Dirac actions for D-branes on backgrounds with ﬂuxes,” Class. Quant. Grav. 22 (2005) 2745 [ hep-th/0504041]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2005

[28] [27]

A. Kapustin and D. Orlov, “Remarks on A-branes, mirror symme try, and the Fukaya category,” J. Geom. Phys. 48 (2003) [ hep-th/0109098]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2003

[29] [28]

J. Gutowski and G. Papadopoulos, “AdS calibrations,” Phys. Le tt. B 462 (1999) 81 [hep-th/9902034]. J. Gutowski, G. Papadopoulos and P. K. Townsend, “Supersymmet ry and generalised calibrations,” Phys. Rev. D 60 (1999) 106006 [ hep-th/9905156]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1999

[30] [30]

J. F. G. Cascales and A. M. Uranga, “Branes on generalised calib rated sub-manifolds,” JHEP 0411 (2004) 083 [ hep-th/0407132]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2004

[31] [31]

S. Gurrieri, J. Louis, A. Micu and D. Waldram, “Mirror symmetry in generalised Calabi-Yau compactiﬁcations,” Nucl. Phys. B 654 (2003) 61 [ hep-th/0211102]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2003

[32] [32]

E. Bergshoeﬀ, R. Kallosh, T. Ortin, D. Roest and A. Van Proeye n, “New formulations of D = 10 supersymmetry and D8 - O8 domain walls,” Class. Quant. Grav. 18 (2001) 3359 [hep-th/0103233]. – 22 –

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2001