Lectures on Fuzzy and Fuzzy SUSY Physics

A. P. Balachandran; S. Kurkcuoglu; S. Vaidya

REVIEW

Lectures on Fuzzy and Fuzzy SUSY Physics

A. P. Balachandran, S. Kurkcuoglu, S. Vaidya

High Energy Physics - Theory · Submitted 9 Nov 2005 · 121 references

Pith's verdict: Honest, well-organized lecture notes on fuzzy physics that are worth having as a reference; the one real soft spot is a genericity step in the gauged Ginsparg-Wilson chapter, and the authors flag most of their other gaps themselves.

T0 · AI review

How this review was made: An AI referee (selfhosted/deepseek-v4.1-flash) read the paper on November 11, 2026 and answered a fixed list of questions about it. T0 is the starting level every paper gets. The levels describe how deeply Pith has checked the paper, never the authors.

T0 AI review An AI read the paper and answered a fixed list of questions.
T1 Audit Automatic checks that the references and files the paper relies on exist and match.
T2 Compute The paper's code or calculations re-run with the same results.
T3 Formal statement The claims written out in a formal math language a computer can read.
T4 Proof Those claims proved, and the proof checked by computer.

How Pith checks papers →

· 1 major objection · 11 minor · Ask about this paper · The compiled record · Read the full review →

Challenge this review Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗

Cite ▾

arXiv IDhep-th/0511114 (version 2)

Pith IDJPTBDBXS, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review

CitationA. P. Balachandran, S. Kurkcuoglu, S. Vaidya. "Lectures on Fuzzy and Fuzzy SUSY Physics." arXiv:hep-th/0511114 (2005). https://pith.science/paper/JPTBDBXS

Cite this reviewBibTeX for Pith's review of this paper

Claim paper

Why Pith says this

Highlight any text to comment on it.

Editor's note

read the letter

You asked whether this is worth your time. It's lecture notes, not a new result, and the authors say so — the abstract is literally a table of contents, which is why the classifier found no claims to score. Judge it as a monograph-length synthesis, not a paper. On that footing it's good: the notation is consistent across chapters, the derivations are explicit enough to check, and it pulls together material that is otherwise scattered across the authors' own papers and a few others. The reader's novelty score of 3 is right; the soundness score of 6 is about right too, maybe a touch generous in chapter 8 and a touch stingy in chapter 9. I agree with the reader's pick of weakest assumption, and with the stress-test note that Eq. 8.42's 'by continuity, for generic A_L' is a genericity claim rather than a proof. The note is also right that the interaction with the transversality constraint (8.41) isn't checked, and that (8.41) doesn't obviously bound the norm of A_L. That said, the word 'generic' is doing honest work — the paper isn't claiming the involution exists for all A_L — and the gap is confined to one chapter. It doesn't touch the fuzzy SUSY construction in chapter 9, which is the part I'd actually send a student to: the V = K'^2 − K^2 operator and the supertrace-as-integral argument in §9.6 are the cleanest things in the book. The star product formulas (3.101, 9.150) are also useful to have in one place. Where the notes deserve credit is candor: §6.4.1 says outright 'We have not understood the relation between the models based on P^(κ) and P_κ'; §8.6 admits the local anomaly and gauge anomalies are untreated; chapter 7 states the U(N)-only gauge group limitation plainly; §4.2 gives the UV-IR mixing story including the Dolan-O'Connor-Presnajder normal-ordering fix rather than burying it. Those are acknowledged limitations, not hidden ones. Who gets value: grad students and postdocs entering fuzzy or noncommutative geometry, and lattice people curious about the alternative. Not someone hunting a theorem. I'd send it out; the referee should press on whether the chapter 8 genericity claim can be tightened or should be restated as an explicit assumption.

Referee report

Major objections (1)

[§8.3.3, Eq. (8.42)] The gauged involution Γ(A_L) is defined by dividing by |σ·(L_L+A_L)+1/2|, with the justification that 'by continuity, for generic A_L' this operator has no zero modes. At A_L=0 the eigenvalues are ±(L+1/2), bounded away from zero, so the step to A_L≠0 is a genericity claim: the zero-mode condition is one scalar equation and hence a codimension-one locus that generic A_L avoids. That is a legitimate heuristic, but it is load-bearing for §8.5, where the gauge-independence of the index TrΓ₂(A_L) is inferred by continuity. The notes do not check the interaction with the transversality constraint (8.41), (L_L+A_L)²=L(L+1), which restricts A_L to a submanifold of much higher codimension; if that submanifold met the zero-mode locus, Γ(A_L) would be undefined on admissible configurations and the argument of §8.5 would fail there. Nor is it obvious that (8.41) bounds the norm of A_L, so a small-perturbation continuity argument is not immediate. Please either cite where [76] establishes this, or state the genericity assumption explicitly and note that the index argument only requires Γ(A_L) to be defined on a connected component of the admissible set.

Minor objections (11)

[Abstract] The abstract is a table of contents plus 'preliminary version, comments and inputs are welcome.' For a book-length set of lecture notes, a short abstract stating scope, intended level, and prerequisites would help readers and indexing.
[§2.3, sentence following Eq. (2.12)] The text says S²_F has radius (1+1/n)^{1/2}, but Eq. (2.12) gives Σx_i² = 1+2/n, i.e. radius √(1+2/n). The sentence and the equation should agree; the CP^N analogue in Eq. (2.59) is consistent with the 2/n form.
[Eqs. (2.30), (2.31), (4.2), (4.3), (4.7)] The angular-momentum range is inconsistent across these equations: (2.30) sums ℓ≤n+1 while (2.31) sums ℓ≤n; (4.2) and (4.3) sum to n+1 while §2.5 gives the spectrum ℓ∈{0,...,n}; (4.7) restricts ℓ≤n/2. Please harmonize the cutoff, since it affects the counting of modes in the loop expansion.
[Eq. (4.13)] The denominator of the two-point function is printed as ℓ(ℓ+1)µ²; it should be ℓ(ℓ+1)+µ², as in (4.12) and (4.14).
[§5.3] The text refers to 'the 2^{2k}×2^{2k} matrix P^(k)' and later to 'P^(k) is 2|k|×2|k|'. Since P^(k) acts on C^{2k}=(C²)^{⊗k}, of dimension 2^k, these should read 2^k×2^k and 2^{|k|}×2^{|k|}; the k=2 example ('C^{2k}=C^4') confirms the intended dimension.
[Eq. (8.33)] The relation is printed as 'aD = J²−L²−3/4+1'. With a=1/(L+1/2) from (8.29) the left side is O(1/L) while the right side is O(L²); the intended relation is D = J²−L²+1/4, as the subsequent spectrum ℓ+1 and −ℓ confirms. The 'a' appears to be a typographical slip.
[Eqs. (2.26) and (3.36)] Both displayed formulas are garbled as printed. In (2.26) the definition 'dΩ = d cos(θ)dψ' is spliced into the action; in (3.36) the definition of the bidiﬀerential operator (∂←_z−∂→_z̄)^k is not readable, with the right-hand side mixing ∂^kα/∂z^k and ∂^kβ/∂z̄^k without the operator structure. These are central formulas for chapter 3 and should be rewritten.
[§1 vs §6.5.3 and §7.1] The introduction contrasts fuzzy physics with lattice regularization by saying it 'does not have these problems' (topology, index theory, axial anomaly). The body then acknowledges that the fuzzy winding number is not integer at finite n (§6.5.3) and that gauge groups escalate to U(d) (§7.1). The framing would be more persuasive if the introduction pointed forward to these caveats rather than leaving the reader to discover them.
[§9.6.5] The fuzzy SUSY action is written for highest-weight states, with the full superfield assembled only in principle ('We must first include all angular momentum descendents...'). The notes acknowledge that the required supersymmetric spherical tensors are not yet available [7]. A sentence in the chapter summary stating explicitly that the exact SUSY is established at the level of the algebra and the highest-weight action would prevent over-reading.
[Throughout] A number of misspellings should be corrected: 'elgantly' (§1), 'challange' (§4.2), 'disccussed' (§8.3.3), 'fundemental' (§8.1), 'refered' (§9.1), 'continously' (§7), 'corriante' (§3.3), 'verfy' (§3.5.4), 'distingiush' (§4.1), 'Grasmmann' (§9.6.5), 'desecendents' (§9.6.5), 'heigest' (§9.6.3).
[Chapter 10] Chapter 10 (Fuzzy Spaces as Hopf Algebras) was not included in the copy I read, so my comments are confined to chapters 1–9. I could not assess the Hopf-algebra material.

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

The paper

The paper claims

A manifold can be discretized by quantizing it, and the resulting finite matrices keep the symmetry, the bundles, and the topology that a lattice throws away.

The reading

The book argues that a classical manifold can be cut off by *quantizing* it rather than by putting it on a lattice, provided the manifold is a coadjoint orbit of a compact Lie group. On the two-sphere this produces the fuzzy sphere: $(n+1)$-dimensional matrices $x_i$ obeying $[x_i,x_j] = (2i/n)e_{ijk}x_k$ and $x_ix_i = 1 + 2/n$, which relaxes back to the ordinary sphere as $n$ grows. The authors' case for caring is that this cutoff keeps what lattice regularization loses: exact rotation symmetry, monopole and instanton sectors built honestly out of projective modules, a Dirac operator with no fermion doubling, and an axial anomaly that appears as an integer index rather than an approximate one. The later chapters extend the same recipe to a fuzzy supersphere built on the superalgebras $osp(2,1)$ and $osp(2,2)$, where supersymmetry survives the cutoff exactly instead of only in the continuum limit.

What carries the argument

Four objects carry the argument. First, the fuzzy sphere algebra itself, generated by $x_i$ with $[x_i,x_j] = (2i/n)e_{ijk}x_k$ and $x_ix_i = 1 + 2/n$, whose left and right actions generate two commuting matrix algebras and give the orbital angular momentum $L_i = L^L_i - L^R_i$ with an undeformed spectrum $l(l+1)$ up to $l = n$. Second, the star products: the coherent-state (Voros) product $f *_C g = f e^{leftarrow{partial}_z rightarrow{partial}_{bar z}} g$ and the Weyl product $f *_W g = f e^{(i/2)omega^{ij} leftarrow{partial}_i rightarrow{partial}_j} g$, with the Weyl product singled out by the trace identity that lets one factor of $*_W$ be dropped inside an integral. Third, the Ginsparg-Wilson algebra generated by two involutions, which yields $D$, the chirality $Gamma_2$, and the index formula $Tr Gamma_2 = $ index of $Gamma_1$; this is what makes the axial anomaly exact. Fourth, the Bott projectors $P^{(k)}(x) = v_k(z) v_k^dagger(z)$ with $v_k = (z_1^k, z_2^k)^T/sqrt{Z_k}$, which turn monopole and instanton sectors into projective modules and whose fuzzy analogues $hat v_k = (a_1^k, a_2^k)^T/sqrt{hat Z_k}$ give the corresponding fuzzy modules.

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that quantization of coadjoint orbits supplies a regularization scheme for quantum field theory that is finite, symmetry-preserving, and topologically faithful. Concretely: the algebra of functions on $S^2$ is replaced by the full matrix algebra $Mat(n+1)$; the coordinates become the angular-momentum matrices; the algebra of functions is deformed by star products (a coherent-state product and a Weyl product, explicitly equivalent to one another); sections of $U(1)$ bundles of Chern number $k$ become projective modules built from Bott projectors $P^{(k)}$; and the Dirac operator is constructed from the Ginsparg-Wilson algebra generated by two involutions $Gamma$ and $Gamma'$, with $D = (Gamma + Gamma')/a$ and chirality $Gamma_2$. On this construction the integrated axial anomaly is $Tr Gamma_2$, an integer that is shown to be independent of the gauge field by continuity, so the anomaly is a topological invariant of the fuzzy model rather than a cutoff artifact. The supersymmetric half of the book makes the analogous claim for $S(2,2)_F$: replacing $su(2)$ by $osp(2,1)$ and $osp(2,2)$ yields a finite supermatrix algebra $Mat(n+1,n)$ on which an exact $OSp(2,1)$-invariant action can be written, with the supertrace playing the role that the ordinary trace plays on $S^2_F$.

Load-bearing premise

The construction of the gauged Dirac operator assumes that the operator $vec{sigma}cdot(vec{L}^L + vec{A}^L) + 1/2$ has no zero modes for a generic fuzzy gauge field, so that dividing by its modulus to form the involution in Eq. 8.42 is legitimate; the text asserts this by continuity from the zero-field case rather than proving it.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Fuzzy regularization gives a finite matrix model of a field theory in which rotation symmetry, the instanton number, and the axial anomaly are all exact at finite cutoff, so numerical work on the matrix model can be extrapolated to the continuum without symmetry restoration errors.
Because the Dirac operator satisfies the Ginsparg-Wilson relation by construction, the fuzzy sphere provides a setting where fermion doubling is absent and the index theorem holds exactly, which is the property lattice formulations struggle to achieve.
Supersymmetric models on $S(2,2)_F$ are finite-dimensional supermatrix models with exact $OSp(2,1)$ invariance, giving a concrete route to numerically studying supersymmetric field theories without the fine-tuning that lattice SUSY normally requires.
The projective-module construction gives a uniform algebraic description of all magnetic charges on the fuzzy sphere, so particles of different monopole charge can coexist in one model even though the fuzzy gauge group cannot tensor arbitrary representations.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the fuzzy Dirac operator's index is truly gauge-field independent by continuity, then the axial anomaly is a genuine topological invariant of the finite matrix model, which would make fuzzy regularization a testing ground for anomaly-matching arguments that are otherwise only checked in the continuum.
The book's own admission that the relation between the two families of CP^1 soliton projectors is not understood suggests a concrete calculation: compare the spectra of the two corresponding fuzzy Dirac operators and see whether the discrepancy sits only in the top angular-momentum mode, as it does for the ordinary fuzzy sphere.
The failure to tensor representations of the fuzzy gauge group is the sharpest structural obstacle described; a reader could test whether the Higgs-field workaround mentioned in passing actually reproduces the charge assignments needed for a realistic model, which would be a decisive check on how far the programme can go.
Since the fuzzy sphere has no continuous deformation parameter, unlike the Moyal plane, the usual map between gauge theories at different deformation parameters has no analogue here; whether some discrete substitute exists is left open and looks like the natural next question.

Original abstract

This is a preliminary version, comments and inputs are welcome. Contents: 1. Introduction. 2. Fuzzy Spaces. 3. Star Products. 4. Scalar Fields on the Fuzzy Sphere. 5. Instantons, Monopoles and Projective Modules. 6. Fuzzy Nonlinear Sigma Models. 7. Fuzzy Gauge Theories. 8. The Dirac Operator and Axial Anomaly. 9. Fuzzy Supersymmetry. 10.Fuzzy Spaces as Hopf Algebras.

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged, kept beside the review and separate from it. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,722 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.02 · states limitation 0.78 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.01 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.02 · compares with prior results 0.02 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; show every role.

This is a preliminary version, comments and inputs are welcome. Contents: 1. Introduction. 2. Fuzzy Spaces. 3. Star Products. 4. Scalar Fields on the Fuzzy Sphere. 5. Instantons, Monopoles and Projective Modules. 6. Fuzzy Nonlinear Sigma Models. 7. Fuzzy Gauge Theories. 8. The Dirac Operator and Axial Anomaly. 9. Fuzzy Supersymmetry. 10.Fuzzy Spaces as Hopf Algebras.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#	sentence	role	the authors' own work	states the main conclusion	strength
s0	This is a preliminary version, comments and inputs are welcome. Contents: 1. Introduction. 2. Fuzzy Spaces. 3. Star Products. 4.	limitation 0.80	0.06	0.02	unclear 0.61
s1	Scalar Fields on the Fuzzy Sphere. 5.	contribution 0.61	0.05	0.02	unclear 1.00
s2	Instantons, Monopoles and Projective Modules. 6.	contribution 0.57	0.06	0.02	unclear 1.00
s3	Fuzzy Nonlinear Sigma Models. 7. Fuzzy Gauge Theories. 8.	contribution 0.60	0.07	0.02	unclear 0.99
s4	The Dirac Operator and Axial Anomaly. 9.	contribution 0.65	0.08	0.02	unclear 0.99
s5	Fuzzy Supersymmetry. 10.Fuzzy Spaces as Hopf Algebras.	contribution 0.57	0.10	0.03	unclear 0.93

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: review 0.98 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.67.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read

arXiv listing abstract v2

not examined

full text
figures and tables
references and citing sentences
relations to other papers

levels run

P abstract

not run

S sections
T body sentences
C citations
R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

References

Works cited (121)

[76]

A. P. Balachandran and G. Immirzi, The fuzzy Ginsparg-W ilson algebra: A solution of the fermion doubling problem, Phys. Rev. D 68, 065023 (2003) [arXiv:hep-th/0301242]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2003
[1]

A. P. Balachandran, video conference course on “Fuzzy Ph ysics”, at http://www.phy.syr.edu/courses/Fuzzy Physics and http: //bach.if.usp.br/FUZZY/

View on Pith
[2]

J. Madore, The Fuzzy Sphere, Class. Quant. Grav. 9, 69 (1992)

View on Pith 1992
[3]

J. Madore, An Introduction to Non-commutative Diﬀerential Geometry an d its Physical Ap- plications, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1995)

View on Pith 1995
[4]

A.A. Kirillov, Encyclopedia of Mathematical Sciences ,vol 4, p.230; B. Kostant, Lecture Notes in Mathematics , vol.170, Springer-Verlag(1970), p.87

View on Pith 1970
[5]

F. A. Berezin, General Concept of Quantization, Commun. Math. Phys. 40, 153 (1975)

View on Pith 1975
[6]

H. Grosse, C. Klimcik, P. Preˇ snajder, Field Theory on a S upersymmetric Lattice, Commun. Math. Phys., 185 (1997) 155-175 and hep-th/9507074; H. Grosse, C. Klimˇ cik, P. Preˇ snajder, N=2 Superalgebra and Non-Commutative Geometry, hep-th/9603071

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1997
[7]

H. Grosse, G. Reiter, The Fuzzy Supersphere, J. Geom. and Phys., 28 (1998) 349-383 and math-ph/9804013

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1998
[8]

A. P. Balachandran, S. Kurkcuoglu and E. Rojas, The Star P roduct on the Fuzzy Super- sphere, JHEP 0207, 056 (2002) [arXiv:hep-th/0204170]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2002
[9]

S. Kurkcuoglu, Ph.D. Thesis, Syracuse University, Syra cuse NY, 2004

View on Pith 2004
[10]

J. Ambjorn and S. Catterall, Stripes from (Noncommutat ive) Stars, Phys. Lett. B 549, 253 (2002) [arXiv:hep-lat/0209106]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2002
[11]

See for example, P. H. Frampton Gauge Field Theories , The Benjamin Cummings Publishing Company, Menlo Park CA, (1987)

View on Pith 1987
[12]

R.D. Sorkin Int.J. Theory. Phys. 30 (1991) 923; A. P. Balachandran, G. Bimonte, E. Ercolessi, G. Landi, F. Li zzi, G. Sparano and P. Teotonio-Sobrinho, Finite Quantum Physics and Noncommu tative Geometry, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 37C, 20 (1995) [arXiv:hep-th/9403067]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1991
[13]

S. Minwalla, M. Van Raamsdonk and N. Seiberg, Noncommut ative Perturbative Dynamics, JHEP 0002, 020 (2000) [arXiv:hep-th/9912072]. 127 128 BIBLIOGRAPHY

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2000
[14]

B. Ydri, Non-commutative geometry as a regulator, Phys . Rev. D 63, 025004 (2001) [arXiv:hep-th/0003232]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2001
[15]

S. Vaidya, Perturbative dynamics on fuzzy S(2) and RP(2 ), Phys. Lett. B 512, 403 (2001) [arXiv:hep-th/0102212]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2001
[16]

C. S. Chu, J. Madore and H. Steinacker, Scaling limits of the fuzzy sphere at one loop, JHEP 0108, 038 (2001) [arXiv:hep-th/0106205]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2001
[17]

B. P. Dolan, D. O’Connor and P. Preˇ snajder, Matrix φ4 models on the fuzzy sphere and their continuum limits”, JHEP 0203, 013 (2002) [arXiv:hep-th/0109084]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2002
[18]

S. Vaidya and B. Ydri, On the origin of the UV-IR mixing in non-commutative matrix geometry, Nucl. Phys. B 671, 401 (2003) [arXiv:hep-th/0305201]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2003
[19]

S. Vaidya and B. Ydri, New scaling limit for fuzzy sphere s, arXiv:hep-th/0209131

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[20]

H. Grosse and A. Strohmaier, Noncommutative geometry a nd the regularization problem of 4D quantum ﬁeld theory, Lett. Math. Phys. 48, 163 (1999) [arXiv:hep-th/9902138]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1999
[21]

G. Alexanian, A. P. Balachandran, G. Immirzi and B. Ydri , Fuzzy CP(2), J. Geom. Phys. 42, 28 (2002) [arXiv:hep-th/0103023]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2002
[22]

A. P. Balachandran, B. P. Dolan, J. H. Lee, X. Martin and D . O’Connor, Fuzzy complex pro- jective spaces and their star-products, J. Geom. Phys. 43, 184 (2002) [arXiv:hep-th/0107099]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2002
[23]

D. Karabali and V. P. Nair, Quantum Hall eﬀect in higher di mensions, Nucl. Phys. B 641, 533 (2002) [arXiv:hep-th/0203264]; D. Karabali and V. P. Nair, The eﬀective action for edge states in higher dimensional quan- tum Hall systems, Nucl. Phys. B 679, 427 (2004) [arXiv:hep-th/0307281]; D. Karabali and V. P. Nair, Edge states for quantum Hall dropl ets in...

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2002
[24]

J. Medina and D. O’Connor, Scalar ﬁeld theory on fuzzy S( 4), JHEP 0311, 051 (2003), [arXiv:hep-th/0212170]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2003
[25]

A. Connes, Non-commutative Geometry San Diego, Academic Press, 1994

View on Pith 1994
[26]

G. Landi, An Introduction to Non-commutative Spaces and their Geometr ies (Springer- Verlag, 1997)

View on Pith 1997
[27]

J.M. Gracia-Bond ´ ıa, J.C. V´ arilly and H. Figueroa,Elements of Non-commutative Geometry (Birkh¨ auser, 2000)

View on Pith 2000
[28]

R. J. Szabo, Quantum ﬁeld theory on non-commutative spa ces, Phys. Rept. 378, 207 (2003) [arXiv:hep-th/0109162]. BIBLIOGRAPHY 129

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2003
[29]

M. R. Douglas and N. A. Nekrasov, Non-commutative ﬁeld t heory, Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, 977 (2001) [arXiv:hep-th/0106048]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2001
[30]

Letter of Heisenberg to Peierls (1930) , Wolfgang Pauli, Scientiﬁc Correspondence, Vol. II, p.15, Ed. Karl von Meyenn, Springer-Verlag, 1985; Letter of Pauli to Oppenheimer (1946) , Wolfgang Pauli, Scientiﬁc Correspondence, Vol. III, p.380, Ed. Karl von Meyenn, Springer-Verlag, 1993

View on Pith 1930
[31]

H. J. Groenewold, On The Principles Of Elementary Quant um Mechanics, Physica 12, 405 (1946)

View on Pith 1946
[32]

H. S. Snyder, Quantized Space-Time, Phys. Rev. 71, 38 (1947); The Electromagnetic Field in Quantized Spacetime, Phys. Rev. 72 (1947) 68

View on Pith 1947
[33]

C. N. Yang, On Quantized Space-Time, Phys. Rev. 72, 874 (1947)

View on Pith 1947
[34]

J. E. Moyal, Quantum Mechanics As A Statistical Theory, Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 45, 99 (1949)

View on Pith 1949
[35]

R. Jackiw, Physical Instances of Noncommuting Coordin ates, Nucl.Phys.Proc.Suppl. 108, 30 (2002) [hep-th/0110057]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2002
[36]

A. P. Balachandran, G. Marmo, B. S. Skagerstam, A. Stern , Classical Topology and Quantum States, World Scientiﬁc, Singapore, 1991

View on Pith 1991
[37]

D. A. Varshalovich, A. N. Moskalev and V. K. Khersonsky, Quantum Theory of Angular Momentum, World Scientiﬁc, New Jersey, 1998

View on Pith 1998
[38]

T. Holstein and H. Primakoﬀ, Field Dependence Of The Intr insic Domain Magnetization Of A Ferromagnet, Phys. Rev. 58, 1098 (1940)

View on Pith 1940
[39]

D. Sen, Quantum-spin-chain realizations of conformal ﬁeld theories Phys. Rev. B 44, 2645(1991)

View on Pith 1991
[40]

H. J. Lipkin Lie Groups for Pedestrians , Dover Publications, 2002

View on Pith 2002
[41]

P. Goddard and D. I. Olive, Kac-Moody And Virasoro Algeb ras In Relation To Quantum Physics, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 1, 303 (1986)

View on Pith 1986
[42]

F. Bayen, M. Flato, C. Fronsdal, A. Lichnerowicz and D. S ternheimer, Deformation Theory And Quantization. 1. Deformations Of Symplectic Structure s, Annals Phys. 111, 61 (1978); F. Bayen, M. Flato, C. Fronsdal, A. Lichnerowicz and D. Stern heimer, Quantum Mechanics As A Deformation Of Classical Mechanics, Lett. Math. Phys. 1, 521 (1977)

View on Pith 1978
[43]

H. Weyl Gruppentheorie und Quantenmechanik The theory of groups and quantum mechan- ics, New York, Dover Publications, 1950; H. Weyl, Quantum Mechanics And Group Theory, Z. Phys. 46, 1 (1927)

View on Pith 1927
[44]

J. R. Klauder and B. S. Skagerstam, Coherent States: Applications in Physics and Mathe- matical Physics , World Scientiﬁc (1985). 130 BIBLIOGRAPHY

View on Pith 1985
[45]

A. M. Perelomov Generalized Coherent States and their Applications , Springer-Verlag (1986)

View on Pith 1986
[46]

G. Alexanian, A. Pinzul and A. Stern, Generalized Coher ent State Approach to Star Products and Applications to the Fuzzy Sphere, Nucl. Phys. B 600, 531 (2001), [arXiv:hep-th/0010187]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2001
[47]

A. Voros, Wentzel-Kramers-Brillouin method in the Bar gmann representation Phys. Rev. A40, 6814 (1989)

View on Pith 1989
[48]

R. Haag, Local quantum physics : ﬁelds, particles, algebras. Berlin, Springer-Verlag (1996)

View on Pith 1996
[49]

M. Kontsevich, Deformation quantization of Poisson ma nifolds, I, Lett. Math. Phys. 66, 157 (2003) [arXiv:q-alg/9709040]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2003
[50]

P. Preˇ snajder, The origin of chiral anomaly and the non -commutative geometry, J. Math. Phys. 41, 2789 (2000) [arXiv:hep-th/9912050]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2000
[51]

H. Grosse, C. Klimcik and P. Preˇ snajder, Towards ﬁnite quantum ﬁeld theory in non- commutative geometry, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 35, 231 (1996) [arXiv:hep-th/9505175]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1996
[52]

H. Grosse and P. Preˇ snajder, The Construction on non-c ommutative manifolds using coher- ent states, Lett. Math. Phys. 28, 239 (1993)

View on Pith 1993
[53]

A. P. Balachandran and G. Immirzi, Fuzzy Nambu-Goldsto ne physics, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 18 (2003) 5981,arXiv:hep-th/0212133

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2003
[54]

M. V. Berry, Quantal Phase Factors Accompanying Adiaba tic Changes, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 392, 45 (1984)

View on Pith 1984
[55]

N.E. Wegge Olsen, K-theory and C∗-Algebras-a Friendly Approach, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1993

View on Pith 1993
[56]

U. Carow-Watamura and S. Watamura, Chirality and Dirac operator on noncommutative sphere,, Commun. Math. Phys. 183, 365 (1997) [arXiv:hep-th/9605003]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1997
[57]

R. Jackiw and C. Rebbi, Spin From Isospin In A Gauge Theor y, Phys. Rev. Lett. 36, 1116 (1976)

View on Pith 1976
[58]

P. Hasenfratz and G. ’t Hooft, A Fermion - Boson Puzzle In A Gauge Theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 36, 1119 (1976)

View on Pith 1976
[59]

A. P. Balachandran, A. Stern and C. G. Trahern, Nonlinea r Models As Gauge Theories, Phys. Rev. D 19, 2416 (1979)

View on Pith 1979
[60]

T. R. Govindarajan and E. Harikumar, O(3) sigma model wi th Hopf term on fuzzy sphere, Nucl. Phys. B 655, 300 (2003) [arXiv:hep-th/0211258]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2003
[61]

Chuan-Tsung Chan, Chiang-Mei Chen, Feng-Li Lin, Hyun S eok Yang, ‘CPn Model on Fuzzy Sphere’, Nucl.Phys. B625 (2002) 327 and hep-th/0105087; Chuan-Tsung Chan, Chiang-Mei Chen, Hyun Seok Yang, “Topolo gical ZN +1 Charges on Fuzzy Sphere”, hep-th/0106269. BIBLIOGRAPHY 131

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2002
[62]

Ludwik Dabrowski, Thomas Krajewski, Giovanni Landi, ‘ Some Properties of Non-linear σ-Models in Noncommutative Geometry’, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B14 (2000) 2367 and hep-th/0003099

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2000
[63]

W.J. Zakrzewski, ‘Low dimensional sigma models’, Adam Hilger, Bristol 1997

View on Pith 1997
[64]

J. A. Mignaco, C. Sigaud, A. R. da Silva and F. J. Vanhecke , ‘The Connes-Lott program on the sphere’, Rev. Math. Phys. 9 (1997) 689 and hep-th/9611058; J. A. Mignaco, C. Sigaud, A. R. da Silva and F. J. Vanhecke, ‘Co nnes-Lott model building on the two-sphere’, Rev. Math. Phys. 13 (2001) 1 and hep-th/9904171

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1997
[65]

G. Landi, Projective Modules of Finite Type over the Sup ersphereS2,2, Diﬀer. Geom. Appl. 14 (2001) 95-111 and math-ph/9907020

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2001
[66]

A. M. Polyakov, Interaction Of Goldstone Particles In T wo-Dimensions. Applications To Ferromagnets And Massive Yang-Mills Fields, Phys. Lett. B 59, 79 (1975); A. M. Polyakov and A. A. Belavin, Metastable States Of Two-Di mensional Isotropic Ferro- magnets, JETP Lett. 22, 245 (1975) [Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 22, 503 (1975)]

View on Pith 1975
[67]

H. Grosse, C. Klimcik and P. Preˇ ssnajder, Topological ly nontrivial ﬁeld conﬁgurations in non-commutative geometry, Commun. Math. Phys. 178, 507 (1996) [arXiv:hep-th/9510083]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1996
[68]

S. Baez, A. P. Balachandran, B. Ydri and S. Vaidya, Monop oles and solitons in fuzzy physics, Commun. Math. Phys. 208, 787 (2000) [arXiv:hep-th/9811169]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2000
[69]

A. P. Balachandran and S. Vaidya, Instantons and chiral anomaly in fuzzy physics, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 16, 17 (2001) [arXiv:hep-th/9910129]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2001
[70]

H. Grosse and J. Madore, A Non-commutative version of th e Schwinger model, Phys. Lett. B 283, 218 (1992). H. Grosse and P. Preˇ snajder, A non-commutative regulariza tion of the Schwinger model, Lett. Math. Phys. 46, 61 (1998)

View on Pith 1992
[71]

M. Chaichian, P. Presnajder, M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari and A . Tureanu, Noncommutative stan- dard model: Model building,Eur. Phys. J. C 29, 413 (2003) [arXiv:hep-th/0107055]; M. Chaichian, P. Presnajder, M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari and A. Tur eanu, Noncommutative gauge ﬁeld theories: A no-go theorem, Phys. Lett. B 526, 132 (2002) [arXiv:hep-th/0107037]. M. Chaichian,...

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2003
[72]

A. P. Balachandran, G. Marmo, N. Mukunda, J. S. Nilsson, E. C. G. Sudarshan and F. Za- ccaria, Monopole Topology And The Problem Of Color, Phys. Re v. Lett. 50, 1553 (1983); A. P. Balachandran, G. Marmo, N. Mukunda, J. S. Nilsson, E. C. G. Sudarshan and F. Za- ccaria, Nonabelian Monopoles Break Color. 1. Classical Mec hanics, Phys. Rev. D 29, 2919 (1984);...

View on Pith 1983
[73]

S. Vaidya, Scalar multi-solitons on the fuzzy sphere, J HEP 0201, 011 (2002) [arXiv:hep-th/0109102]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2002
[74]

D. Karabali, V. P. Nair and A. P. Polychronakos, Spectru m of Schroedinger ﬁeld in a non- commutative magnetic monopole, Nucl. Phys. B 627, 565 (2002) [arXiv:hep-th/0111249]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2002
[75]

P. H. Ginsparg and K. G. Wilson, A Remnant Of Chiral Symme try On The Lattice, Phys. Rev. D 25, 2649 (1982)

View on Pith 1982
[77]

K. Fujikawa, Path Integral Measure For Gauge Invariant Fermion Theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 1195 (1979); K. Fujikawa, Path Integral For Gauge Theories With Fermions, Phys. Rev. D 21, 2848 (1980) [Erratum-ibid. D 22, 1499 (1980)]

View on Pith 1979
[78]

A. P. Balachandran, G. Marmo, V. P. Nair and C. G. Trahern , A Nonperturbative Proof Of The Nonabelian Anomalies, Phys. Rev. D 25, 2713 (1982)

View on Pith 1982
[79]

S. Randjbar-Daemi and J. A. Strathdee, On the overlap fo rmulation of chiral gauge theory, Phys. Lett. B 348, 543 (1995) [arXiv:hep-th/9412165]; S. Randjbar-Daemi and J. A. Strathdee, Gravitational Loren tz anomaly from the overlap formula in two-dimensions, Phys. Rev. D 51, 6617 (1995) [arXiv:hep-th/9501012]; S. Randjbar-Daemi and J. A. Strathdee, Chiral...

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1995
[80]

A. P. Balachandran, T. R. Govindarajan and B. Ydri, The f ermion doubling problem and noncommutative geometry, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 15, 1279 (2000) [arXiv:hep-th/9911087]. A. P. Balachandran, T. R. Govindarajan and B. Ydri, The fermi on doubling problem and noncommutative geometry. II, arXiv:hep-th/000621. BIBLIOGRAPHY 133

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2000
[81]

A. Bassetto and L. Griguolo, Journ. of Math. Phys. 32 (1991) 3195

View on Pith 1991
[82]

H. Aoki, S. Iso and K. Nagao, Chiral anomaly on fuzzy 2-sp here, Phys. Rev. D 67, 065018 (2003) [arXiv:hep-th/0209137]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2003
[83]

J. Madore, S. Schraml, P. Schupp and J. Wess, Gauge theor y on noncommutative spaces, Eur. Phys. J. C 16, 161 (2000) [arXiv:hep-th/0001203]; X. Calmet, B. Jurco, P. Schupp, J. Wess and M. Wohlgenannt, Th e standard model on non-commutative space-time, Eur. Phys. J. C 23, 363 (2002) [arXiv:hep-ph/0111115]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2000
[84]

N. Seiberg and E. Witten, String theory and noncommutat ive geometry, JHEP 9909, 032 (1999) [arXiv:hep-th/9908142]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1999
[85]

B. Ydri, Ph.D. Thesis, Syracuse University, NY,2001, a rXiv:hep-th/0110006; B. Ydri, Noncommutative chiral anomaly and the Dirac-Ginsp arg-Wilson operator, JHEP 0308, 046 (2003) [arXiv:hep-th/0211209]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2003
[86]

M. Scheunert, W. Nahm and V. Rittenberg, Graded Lie Alge bras: Generalization Of Her- mitian Representations, J. Math. Phys. 18, 146 (1977)

View on Pith 1977
[87]

M. Scheunert, W. Nahm and V. Rittenberg, Irreducible Re presentations Of The Osp(2,1) And Spl(2,1) Graded Lie Algebras, J. Math. Phys. 18, 155 (1977)

View on Pith 1977
[88]

A. Pais and V. Rittenberg, Semisimple Graded Lie Algebr as, J. Math. Phys. 16, 2062 (1975) [Erratum-ibid. 17, 598 (1976)]

View on Pith 1975
[89]

B. Dewitt, Supermanifolds, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1985); M. Scheunert, The Theory of Lie Superalgebras , Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1979)

View on Pith 1985
[90]

J. F. Cornwell, Group Theory in Physics Vol. III , Academic Press, San Diego (1989)

View on Pith 1989
[91]

L. Frappat, A. Sciarrino, P. Sorba, Dictionary on Lie Su peralgebras, hep-th/9607161

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[92]

M. Chaichian, D. Ellinas and P. Preˇ snajder, Path Integ rals And Supercoherent States, J. Math. Phys. 32, 3381 (1991)

View on Pith 1991
[93]

A. El Gradechi and L. M. Nieto, Supercoherent states, su perKahler geometry and geometric quantization, Commun. Math. Phys., 175 (1996) 521, and hep-th/9403109; A. M. El Gradechi, On the supersymplectic homogeneous super space underlying the OSp(1/2) coherent states,” J. Math. Phys. 34, 5951 (1993)

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1996
[94]

M. Bordemann, M. Brischle, C. Emmrich and S. Waldmann, s ubalgebras with convering star products in deformation quantization: An algebraic constr uction for CPn, J. Math. Phys., 37 (1996) 6311; q-alg/9512019; M. Bordemann, M. Brischle, C. Emmrich and S. Waldmann, Lett. Math. Phys., 36 (1996) 357; S. Waldmann, Lett. Math. Phys., 44 (1998) 331. 134 BIBLIOGRAPHY

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1996
[95]

F. A. Berezin and V. N. Tolstoi, The Group With Grassmann Structure Uosp(1,2), Commun. Math. Phys. 78, 409 (1981). F. A. Berezin, Introduction to Superanalysis, D.Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Hol- land (1987)

View on Pith 1981
[96]

A. P. Balachandran, G.Marmo, B. S. Skagerstam and A. Ste rn, Supersymmetric Point Par- ticles And Monopoles With No Strings, Nucl. Phys. B164 (1980) 427; G. Landi and G. Marmo, Phy. Lett. B193 (1987) 61-66. Extensions Of Lie Superalgebras And Supersymmetric Abelian Gauge Fields,

View on Pith 1980
[97]

C. Fronsdal Essays on Supersymmetry . Mathematical Physics Studies Volume 8, Editor: Fronsdal, C. , Dordrecht, Reidel Pub.Co. 1986

View on Pith 1986
[98]

J. Wess, J. Bagger Princeton series in physics: supersymmetry and supergravi ty, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1983

View on Pith 1983
[99]

A. P. Balachandran, A. Pinzul and B. Qureshi, SUSY anoma lies break N = 2 to N = 1: The supersphere and the fuzzy supersphere, arXiv:hep-th/0506 037

View on Pith
[100]

C. Klimcik, A nonperturbative regularization of the s upersymmetric Schwinger model, Commun. Math. Phys. 206, 567 (1999) [arXiv:hep-th/9903112]; C. Klimcik, An extended fuzzy supersphere and twisted chira l superﬁelds, Commun. Math. Phys. 206, 587 (1999) [arXiv:hep-th/9903202]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1999
[101]

S. Kurkcuoglu, Non-linear sigma models on the fuzzy su persphere, JHEP 0403, 062 (2004) [arXiv:hep-th/0311031]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2004
[102]

E. Witten, A Supersymmetric Form Of The Nonlinear Sigm a Model In Two-Dimensions, Phys. Rev. D 16, 2991 (1977)

View on Pith 1977
[103]

P. Di Vecchia and S. Ferrara, Classical Solutions In Tw o-Dimensional Supersymmetric Field Theories, Nucl. Phys. B 130, 93 (1977)

View on Pith 1977
[104]

M. E. Sweedler Hopf Algebras, W. A. Benjamin, New York, 1969. A. A. Kirillov, Elements of the Theory of Representations , Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1976

View on Pith 1969
[105]

G. Mack and V. Schomerus, QuasiHopf quantum symmetry i n quantum theory, Nucl. Phys. B 370, 185 (1992); G. Mack and V. Schomerus in New symmetry principles in Quantum Field Theory , Edited by J.Frohlich et al., Plenum Press, New York, 1992; G. Mack and V. Schomerus, Quantum symmetry for pedestrians, preprint, DESY-92-053

View on Pith 1992
[106]

A. P. Balachandran and S. Kurkcuoglu, Topology change for fuzzy physics: Fuzzy spaces as Hopf algebras, arXiv:hep-th/0310026

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[107]

R. Figari, R. H¨ oegh-Krohn and C. R. Nappi, Interactin g relativistic boson ﬁelds in the de Sitter universe with two space-time dimensions, Commun. Ma th. Phys. 44, 265 (1975). BIBLIOGRAPHY 135

View on Pith 1975
[108]

J. Pawelczyk and H. Steinacker, A quantum algebraic de scription of D-branes on group manifolds, Nucl. Phys. B 638, 433 (2002) [arXiv:hep-th/0203110]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2002
[109]

A. P. Balachandran and C. G. Trahern Lectures on Group Theory for Physicists , Mono- graphs and Textbooks in Physical Science, Bibliopolis, Nap oli, 1984

View on Pith 1984
[110]

A. P. Balachandran, E. Batista, I. P. Costa e Silva and P . Teotonio-Sobrinho, Quantum topology change in (2+1)d, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 15, 1629 (2000) [arXiv:hep-th/9905136]; A. P. Balachandran, E. Batista, I. P. Costa e Silva and P. Teot onio-Sobrinho, The spin-statistics connection in quantum gravity, Nucl. P hys. B 566, 441 (2000) [arXiv:hep-th/9906174...

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2000
[111]

S. Dascalescu, C. Nastasescu, S. Raianu Hopf algebras : an introduction , New York, Marcel Dekker, 2001 . Relation of Fuzzy Physics to Brane physics have been investi gated. Some articles on this subject are:

View on Pith 2001
[112]

A. Y. Alekseev, A. Recknagel and V. Schomerus, Non-com mutative world-volume geome- tries: Branes on SU(2) and fuzzy spheres, JHEP 9909, 023 (1999) [arXiv:hep-th/9908040]. A. Y. Alekseev, A. Recknagel and V. Schomerus, Open strings a nd non-commutative geome- try of branes on group manifolds, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 16, 325 (2001) [arXiv:hep-th/0104054]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1999
[113]

C. Klimcik and P. Severa, Open strings and D-branes in W ZNW models, Nucl. Phys. B 488, 653 (1997) [arXiv:hep-th/9609112]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1997
[114]

A. Y. Alekseev and V. Schomerus, D-branes in the WZW mod el, Phys. Rev. D 60, 061901 (1999) [arXiv:hep-th/9812193]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1999
[115]

K. Gawedzki, Conformal ﬁeld theory: A case study, arXi v:hep-th/9904145

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[116]

H. Garcia-Compean and J. F. Plebanski, D-branes on gro up manifolds and deformation quantization, Nucl. Phys. B 618, 81 (2001) [arXiv:hep-th/9907183]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2001
[117]

R. C. Myers, Dielectric-branes, JHEP 9912, 022 (1999) [arXiv:hep-th/9910053]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1999
[118]

S. P. Trivedi and S. Vaidya, Fuzzy cosets and their grav ity duals, JHEP 0009, 041 (2000) [arXiv:hep-th/0007011]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2000
[119]

S. R. Das, S. P. Trivedi and S. Vaidya, Magnetic moments of branes and giant gravitons, JHEP 0010, 037 (2000) [arXiv:hep-th/0008203]. Quantum ﬁeld theories on fuzzy spaces are also studied via nu merical methods. Some articles on this subject are:

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2000
[120]

X. Martin, A matrix phase for the phi**4 scalar ﬁeld on t he fuzzy sphere, JHEP 0404, 077 (2004) [arXiv:hep-th/0402230]. 136 BIBLIOGRAPHY

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2004
[121]

T. Azuma, S. Bal, K. Nagao and J. Nishimura, Nonperturb ative studies of fuzzy spheres in a matrix model with the Chern-Simons term,” JHEP 0405, 005 (2004) [arXiv:hep-th/0401038]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2004

Forward citations

Cited by 6 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Numerical Study of Scalar Field Theory on the Fuzzy Onion
hep-th 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

The fuzzy onion scalar field theory shows three fuzzy-sphere-like phases with aligned layers, dynamical phase transitions that blur boundaries, and two fitted phase-boundary curves of the form |b| = k1 + k2 sqrt(c).
Effective field theory of the quantum skyrmion Hall effect
hep-th 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

Isospin degrees of freedom encode fuzzy extra dimensions even at small matrix size, so systems with d spatial coordinates can realize topological states of intrinsic dimensionality up to d+δ+1, captured by a generaliz...
Asymptotic Quantization of Palatini Action
gr-qc 2024-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

The Palatini action can be quantized on R^3 using SL(2,C) as the complexification of SU(2), yielding theta vacua and suggesting that the Gauss law algebra replaces diffeomorphism constraints.
The unwarped, resolved, deformed conifold: fivebranes and the baryonic branch of the Klebanov-Strassler theory
hep-th 2009-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

A single family of supergravity solutions connects the deformed conifold with flux to the resolved conifold with wrapped fivebranes, and the baryonic-branch vacuum expectation values of the Klebanov-Strassler theory a...
Nonlocal regularisation of noncommutative field theories
hep-th 2006-04 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

A nonlocal regulator applied to noncommutative phi^4 theory, with the noncommutativity parameter scaled as the inverse cutoff squared, gives one-loop results with no UV-IR pole and eta-dependent beta function terms.

Show 1 more citing papers

On the quantum structure of space-time, gravity, and higher spin in matrix models
hep-th 2019-11 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

A specific quantum space-time solution of the mass-deformed IKKT matrix model yields a ghost-free higher-spin gauge theory whose spin-2 sector reproduces linearized gravity and the Schwarzschild solution.

How the literature uses it

53 arXiv papers cite this in 85 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 41 sentences without a confident label

Uses its method or tool 3 papers

Following [ref] we consider imposing the constraints (X_a + Γ_a + A_a)^2 = (X_a + Γ_a)^2 = - (ℓ+ γ)(ℓ+γ+1) 1 where $γ$ is taking on the values $±1/2 , 0$.

New Fuzzy Extra Dimensions from $SU({\cal N})$ Gauge Theories · The Vacuum Structure and Gauge Theory over $M ×S_F^2 Int$ · 0.93
Following the approaches in [ref] , we introduce the conditions [equation] where $γ=0,±1/2$.

Equivariant Fields in an $SU({\cal N})$ Gauge Theory with new Spontaneously Generated Fuzzy Extra Dimensions · Gauge Theory over $M^4 ×S_F^2 Int ×S_F^2 Int$ · 0.92
Another way to construct a theory that contains a classical $S^3$, described in an $(2) ×(1)$ covariant manner, might be to realise the standard Holstein-Primakoff construction with Heisenberg oscillators [ref] .

The fuzzy S^2 structure of M2-M5 systems in ABJM membrane theories · Multi-membrane actions and $S^3$ at large $N$ · 0.82

Compares with it 1 paper

The Dirac operator constructed in section IIIB of [ref] by using the Ginsparg-Wilson relations, which also appears in section 8.3.2 of [ref] , and is the spin-1/2 case in [ref] , is essentially the same as the Dirac operator that we have constructed above.

Dirac operators for matrix algebras converging to coadjoint orbits · The fuzzy sphere · 1.00

Cites it as support 1 paper

An intriguing result that we came across in our studies is that the vacuum configuration $S_F^2 Int$ forms the bosonic part of the $N=2$ fuzzy supersphere with $OSP(2,2)$ supersymmetry [ref] .

New Fuzzy Extra Dimensions from $SU({\cal N})$ Gauge Theories · Introduction · 0.96

Cites it as background 32 papers

It represents nonassociative spaces [ref] as well as noncommutative ones [ref] .] is described by an algebra of functions, which can be characterized by a rank-three tensor that defines multiplication, $f_a ⋆f_b=C_ab^cf_c$.

Emergent general relativity in the tensor models possessing Gaussian classical solutions · Introduction · 0.94
These in turn lead to the $(2)$ decompositions of $End ( )$, $End ( )$, $Hom ( , )$, $Hom ( , )$, for the fluctuation matrices that we saw in Section [ref].[The usual fuzzy $S^2$ has also been discussed in terms of the Hopf fibration, where the realisation of the $(2)$ generators in terms of bilinears in Heisenberg algebra oscillators yields an infinite dimensional space which admits various projections to finite $N$ constructions [ref] .

Bifundamental Fuzzy 2-Sphere and Fuzzy Killing Spinors · Hopf fibration interpretation · 0.92
To understand this statement, let us briefly recall the Berezin-Toeplitz quantization of the 2-sphere [ref] , see also [ref] and references therein.

Magnetic Domains · Nahm transform and the fuzzy funnel · 0.85

Discussion

Disagree with the review, or know something it missed? Leave a comment, highlight any passage above to comment on it, or challenge this review formally.

[1] [76]

A. P. Balachandran and G. Immirzi, The fuzzy Ginsparg-W ilson algebra: A solution of the fermion doubling problem, Phys. Rev. D 68, 065023 (2003) [arXiv:hep-th/0301242]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2003

[2] [1]

A. P. Balachandran, video conference course on “Fuzzy Ph ysics”, at http://www.phy.syr.edu/courses/Fuzzy Physics and http: //bach.if.usp.br/FUZZY/

View on Pith

[3] [2]

J. Madore, The Fuzzy Sphere, Class. Quant. Grav. 9, 69 (1992)

View on Pith 1992

[4] [3]

J. Madore, An Introduction to Non-commutative Diﬀerential Geometry an d its Physical Ap- plications, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1995)

View on Pith 1995

[5] [4]

A.A. Kirillov, Encyclopedia of Mathematical Sciences ,vol 4, p.230; B. Kostant, Lecture Notes in Mathematics , vol.170, Springer-Verlag(1970), p.87

View on Pith 1970

[6] [5]

F. A. Berezin, General Concept of Quantization, Commun. Math. Phys. 40, 153 (1975)

View on Pith 1975

[7] [6]

H. Grosse, C. Klimcik, P. Preˇ snajder, Field Theory on a S upersymmetric Lattice, Commun. Math. Phys., 185 (1997) 155-175 and hep-th/9507074; H. Grosse, C. Klimˇ cik, P. Preˇ snajder, N=2 Superalgebra and Non-Commutative Geometry, hep-th/9603071

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1997

[8] [7]

H. Grosse, G. Reiter, The Fuzzy Supersphere, J. Geom. and Phys., 28 (1998) 349-383 and math-ph/9804013

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1998

[9] [8]

A. P. Balachandran, S. Kurkcuoglu and E. Rojas, The Star P roduct on the Fuzzy Super- sphere, JHEP 0207, 056 (2002) [arXiv:hep-th/0204170]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2002

[10] [9]

S. Kurkcuoglu, Ph.D. Thesis, Syracuse University, Syra cuse NY, 2004

View on Pith 2004

[11] [10]

J. Ambjorn and S. Catterall, Stripes from (Noncommutat ive) Stars, Phys. Lett. B 549, 253 (2002) [arXiv:hep-lat/0209106]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2002

[12] [11]

See for example, P. H. Frampton Gauge Field Theories , The Benjamin Cummings Publishing Company, Menlo Park CA, (1987)

View on Pith 1987

[13] [12]

R.D. Sorkin Int.J. Theory. Phys. 30 (1991) 923; A. P. Balachandran, G. Bimonte, E. Ercolessi, G. Landi, F. Li zzi, G. Sparano and P. Teotonio-Sobrinho, Finite Quantum Physics and Noncommu tative Geometry, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 37C, 20 (1995) [arXiv:hep-th/9403067]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1991

[14] [13]

S. Minwalla, M. Van Raamsdonk and N. Seiberg, Noncommut ative Perturbative Dynamics, JHEP 0002, 020 (2000) [arXiv:hep-th/9912072]. 127 128 BIBLIOGRAPHY

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2000

[15] [14]

B. Ydri, Non-commutative geometry as a regulator, Phys . Rev. D 63, 025004 (2001) [arXiv:hep-th/0003232]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2001

[16] [15]

S. Vaidya, Perturbative dynamics on fuzzy S(2) and RP(2 ), Phys. Lett. B 512, 403 (2001) [arXiv:hep-th/0102212]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2001

[17] [16]

C. S. Chu, J. Madore and H. Steinacker, Scaling limits of the fuzzy sphere at one loop, JHEP 0108, 038 (2001) [arXiv:hep-th/0106205]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2001

[18] [17]

B. P. Dolan, D. O’Connor and P. Preˇ snajder, Matrix φ4 models on the fuzzy sphere and their continuum limits”, JHEP 0203, 013 (2002) [arXiv:hep-th/0109084]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2002

[19] [18]

S. Vaidya and B. Ydri, On the origin of the UV-IR mixing in non-commutative matrix geometry, Nucl. Phys. B 671, 401 (2003) [arXiv:hep-th/0305201]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2003

[20] [19]

S. Vaidya and B. Ydri, New scaling limit for fuzzy sphere s, arXiv:hep-th/0209131

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[21] [20]

H. Grosse and A. Strohmaier, Noncommutative geometry a nd the regularization problem of 4D quantum ﬁeld theory, Lett. Math. Phys. 48, 163 (1999) [arXiv:hep-th/9902138]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1999

[22] [21]

G. Alexanian, A. P. Balachandran, G. Immirzi and B. Ydri , Fuzzy CP(2), J. Geom. Phys. 42, 28 (2002) [arXiv:hep-th/0103023]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2002

[23] [22]

A. P. Balachandran, B. P. Dolan, J. H. Lee, X. Martin and D . O’Connor, Fuzzy complex pro- jective spaces and their star-products, J. Geom. Phys. 43, 184 (2002) [arXiv:hep-th/0107099]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2002

[24] [23]

D. Karabali and V. P. Nair, Quantum Hall eﬀect in higher di mensions, Nucl. Phys. B 641, 533 (2002) [arXiv:hep-th/0203264]; D. Karabali and V. P. Nair, The eﬀective action for edge states in higher dimensional quan- tum Hall systems, Nucl. Phys. B 679, 427 (2004) [arXiv:hep-th/0307281]; D. Karabali and V. P. Nair, Edge states for quantum Hall dropl ets in...

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2002

[25] [24]

J. Medina and D. O’Connor, Scalar ﬁeld theory on fuzzy S( 4), JHEP 0311, 051 (2003), [arXiv:hep-th/0212170]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2003

[26] [25]

A. Connes, Non-commutative Geometry San Diego, Academic Press, 1994

View on Pith 1994

[27] [26]

G. Landi, An Introduction to Non-commutative Spaces and their Geometr ies (Springer- Verlag, 1997)

View on Pith 1997

[28] [27]

J.M. Gracia-Bond ´ ıa, J.C. V´ arilly and H. Figueroa,Elements of Non-commutative Geometry (Birkh¨ auser, 2000)

View on Pith 2000

[29] [28]

R. J. Szabo, Quantum ﬁeld theory on non-commutative spa ces, Phys. Rept. 378, 207 (2003) [arXiv:hep-th/0109162]. BIBLIOGRAPHY 129

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2003

[30] [29]

M. R. Douglas and N. A. Nekrasov, Non-commutative ﬁeld t heory, Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, 977 (2001) [arXiv:hep-th/0106048]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2001

[31] [30]

Letter of Heisenberg to Peierls (1930) , Wolfgang Pauli, Scientiﬁc Correspondence, Vol. II, p.15, Ed. Karl von Meyenn, Springer-Verlag, 1985; Letter of Pauli to Oppenheimer (1946) , Wolfgang Pauli, Scientiﬁc Correspondence, Vol. III, p.380, Ed. Karl von Meyenn, Springer-Verlag, 1993

View on Pith 1930

[32] [31]

H. J. Groenewold, On The Principles Of Elementary Quant um Mechanics, Physica 12, 405 (1946)

View on Pith 1946

[33] [32]

H. S. Snyder, Quantized Space-Time, Phys. Rev. 71, 38 (1947); The Electromagnetic Field in Quantized Spacetime, Phys. Rev. 72 (1947) 68

View on Pith 1947

[34] [33]

C. N. Yang, On Quantized Space-Time, Phys. Rev. 72, 874 (1947)

View on Pith 1947

[35] [34]

J. E. Moyal, Quantum Mechanics As A Statistical Theory, Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 45, 99 (1949)

View on Pith 1949

[36] [35]

R. Jackiw, Physical Instances of Noncommuting Coordin ates, Nucl.Phys.Proc.Suppl. 108, 30 (2002) [hep-th/0110057]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2002

[37] [36]

A. P. Balachandran, G. Marmo, B. S. Skagerstam, A. Stern , Classical Topology and Quantum States, World Scientiﬁc, Singapore, 1991

View on Pith 1991

[38] [37]

D. A. Varshalovich, A. N. Moskalev and V. K. Khersonsky, Quantum Theory of Angular Momentum, World Scientiﬁc, New Jersey, 1998

View on Pith 1998

[39] [38]

T. Holstein and H. Primakoﬀ, Field Dependence Of The Intr insic Domain Magnetization Of A Ferromagnet, Phys. Rev. 58, 1098 (1940)

View on Pith 1940

[40] [39]

D. Sen, Quantum-spin-chain realizations of conformal ﬁeld theories Phys. Rev. B 44, 2645(1991)

View on Pith 1991

[41] [40]

H. J. Lipkin Lie Groups for Pedestrians , Dover Publications, 2002

View on Pith 2002

[42] [41]

P. Goddard and D. I. Olive, Kac-Moody And Virasoro Algeb ras In Relation To Quantum Physics, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 1, 303 (1986)

View on Pith 1986

[43] [42]

F. Bayen, M. Flato, C. Fronsdal, A. Lichnerowicz and D. S ternheimer, Deformation Theory And Quantization. 1. Deformations Of Symplectic Structure s, Annals Phys. 111, 61 (1978); F. Bayen, M. Flato, C. Fronsdal, A. Lichnerowicz and D. Stern heimer, Quantum Mechanics As A Deformation Of Classical Mechanics, Lett. Math. Phys. 1, 521 (1977)

View on Pith 1978

[44] [43]

H. Weyl Gruppentheorie und Quantenmechanik The theory of groups and quantum mechan- ics, New York, Dover Publications, 1950; H. Weyl, Quantum Mechanics And Group Theory, Z. Phys. 46, 1 (1927)

View on Pith 1927

[45] [44]

J. R. Klauder and B. S. Skagerstam, Coherent States: Applications in Physics and Mathe- matical Physics , World Scientiﬁc (1985). 130 BIBLIOGRAPHY

View on Pith 1985

[46] [45]

A. M. Perelomov Generalized Coherent States and their Applications , Springer-Verlag (1986)

View on Pith 1986

[47] [46]

G. Alexanian, A. Pinzul and A. Stern, Generalized Coher ent State Approach to Star Products and Applications to the Fuzzy Sphere, Nucl. Phys. B 600, 531 (2001), [arXiv:hep-th/0010187]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2001

[48] [47]

A. Voros, Wentzel-Kramers-Brillouin method in the Bar gmann representation Phys. Rev. A40, 6814 (1989)

View on Pith 1989

[49] [48]

R. Haag, Local quantum physics : ﬁelds, particles, algebras. Berlin, Springer-Verlag (1996)

View on Pith 1996

[50] [49]

M. Kontsevich, Deformation quantization of Poisson ma nifolds, I, Lett. Math. Phys. 66, 157 (2003) [arXiv:q-alg/9709040]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2003

[51] [50]

P. Preˇ snajder, The origin of chiral anomaly and the non -commutative geometry, J. Math. Phys. 41, 2789 (2000) [arXiv:hep-th/9912050]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2000

[52] [51]

H. Grosse, C. Klimcik and P. Preˇ snajder, Towards ﬁnite quantum ﬁeld theory in non- commutative geometry, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 35, 231 (1996) [arXiv:hep-th/9505175]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1996

[53] [52]

H. Grosse and P. Preˇ snajder, The Construction on non-c ommutative manifolds using coher- ent states, Lett. Math. Phys. 28, 239 (1993)

View on Pith 1993

[54] [53]

A. P. Balachandran and G. Immirzi, Fuzzy Nambu-Goldsto ne physics, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 18 (2003) 5981,arXiv:hep-th/0212133

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2003

[55] [54]

M. V. Berry, Quantal Phase Factors Accompanying Adiaba tic Changes, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 392, 45 (1984)

View on Pith 1984

[56] [55]

N.E. Wegge Olsen, K-theory and C∗-Algebras-a Friendly Approach, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1993

View on Pith 1993

[57] [56]

U. Carow-Watamura and S. Watamura, Chirality and Dirac operator on noncommutative sphere,, Commun. Math. Phys. 183, 365 (1997) [arXiv:hep-th/9605003]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1997

[58] [57]

R. Jackiw and C. Rebbi, Spin From Isospin In A Gauge Theor y, Phys. Rev. Lett. 36, 1116 (1976)

View on Pith 1976

[59] [58]

P. Hasenfratz and G. ’t Hooft, A Fermion - Boson Puzzle In A Gauge Theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 36, 1119 (1976)

View on Pith 1976

[60] [59]

A. P. Balachandran, A. Stern and C. G. Trahern, Nonlinea r Models As Gauge Theories, Phys. Rev. D 19, 2416 (1979)

View on Pith 1979

[61] [60]

T. R. Govindarajan and E. Harikumar, O(3) sigma model wi th Hopf term on fuzzy sphere, Nucl. Phys. B 655, 300 (2003) [arXiv:hep-th/0211258]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2003

[62] [61]

Chuan-Tsung Chan, Chiang-Mei Chen, Feng-Li Lin, Hyun S eok Yang, ‘CPn Model on Fuzzy Sphere’, Nucl.Phys. B625 (2002) 327 and hep-th/0105087; Chuan-Tsung Chan, Chiang-Mei Chen, Hyun Seok Yang, “Topolo gical ZN +1 Charges on Fuzzy Sphere”, hep-th/0106269. BIBLIOGRAPHY 131

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2002

[63] [62]

Ludwik Dabrowski, Thomas Krajewski, Giovanni Landi, ‘ Some Properties of Non-linear σ-Models in Noncommutative Geometry’, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B14 (2000) 2367 and hep-th/0003099

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2000

[64] [63]

W.J. Zakrzewski, ‘Low dimensional sigma models’, Adam Hilger, Bristol 1997

View on Pith 1997

[65] [64]

J. A. Mignaco, C. Sigaud, A. R. da Silva and F. J. Vanhecke , ‘The Connes-Lott program on the sphere’, Rev. Math. Phys. 9 (1997) 689 and hep-th/9611058; J. A. Mignaco, C. Sigaud, A. R. da Silva and F. J. Vanhecke, ‘Co nnes-Lott model building on the two-sphere’, Rev. Math. Phys. 13 (2001) 1 and hep-th/9904171

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1997

[66] [65]

G. Landi, Projective Modules of Finite Type over the Sup ersphereS2,2, Diﬀer. Geom. Appl. 14 (2001) 95-111 and math-ph/9907020

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2001

[67] [66]

A. M. Polyakov, Interaction Of Goldstone Particles In T wo-Dimensions. Applications To Ferromagnets And Massive Yang-Mills Fields, Phys. Lett. B 59, 79 (1975); A. M. Polyakov and A. A. Belavin, Metastable States Of Two-Di mensional Isotropic Ferro- magnets, JETP Lett. 22, 245 (1975) [Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 22, 503 (1975)]

View on Pith 1975

[68] [67]

H. Grosse, C. Klimcik and P. Preˇ ssnajder, Topological ly nontrivial ﬁeld conﬁgurations in non-commutative geometry, Commun. Math. Phys. 178, 507 (1996) [arXiv:hep-th/9510083]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1996

[69] [68]

S. Baez, A. P. Balachandran, B. Ydri and S. Vaidya, Monop oles and solitons in fuzzy physics, Commun. Math. Phys. 208, 787 (2000) [arXiv:hep-th/9811169]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2000

[70] [69]

A. P. Balachandran and S. Vaidya, Instantons and chiral anomaly in fuzzy physics, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 16, 17 (2001) [arXiv:hep-th/9910129]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2001

[71] [70]

H. Grosse and J. Madore, A Non-commutative version of th e Schwinger model, Phys. Lett. B 283, 218 (1992). H. Grosse and P. Preˇ snajder, A non-commutative regulariza tion of the Schwinger model, Lett. Math. Phys. 46, 61 (1998)

View on Pith 1992

[72] [71]

M. Chaichian, P. Presnajder, M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari and A . Tureanu, Noncommutative stan- dard model: Model building,Eur. Phys. J. C 29, 413 (2003) [arXiv:hep-th/0107055]; M. Chaichian, P. Presnajder, M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari and A. Tur eanu, Noncommutative gauge ﬁeld theories: A no-go theorem, Phys. Lett. B 526, 132 (2002) [arXiv:hep-th/0107037]. M. Chaichian,...

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2003

[73] [72]

A. P. Balachandran, G. Marmo, N. Mukunda, J. S. Nilsson, E. C. G. Sudarshan and F. Za- ccaria, Monopole Topology And The Problem Of Color, Phys. Re v. Lett. 50, 1553 (1983); A. P. Balachandran, G. Marmo, N. Mukunda, J. S. Nilsson, E. C. G. Sudarshan and F. Za- ccaria, Nonabelian Monopoles Break Color. 1. Classical Mec hanics, Phys. Rev. D 29, 2919 (1984);...

View on Pith 1983

[74] [73]

S. Vaidya, Scalar multi-solitons on the fuzzy sphere, J HEP 0201, 011 (2002) [arXiv:hep-th/0109102]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2002

[75] [74]

D. Karabali, V. P. Nair and A. P. Polychronakos, Spectru m of Schroedinger ﬁeld in a non- commutative magnetic monopole, Nucl. Phys. B 627, 565 (2002) [arXiv:hep-th/0111249]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2002

[76] [75]

P. H. Ginsparg and K. G. Wilson, A Remnant Of Chiral Symme try On The Lattice, Phys. Rev. D 25, 2649 (1982)

View on Pith 1982

[77] [77]

K. Fujikawa, Path Integral Measure For Gauge Invariant Fermion Theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 1195 (1979); K. Fujikawa, Path Integral For Gauge Theories With Fermions, Phys. Rev. D 21, 2848 (1980) [Erratum-ibid. D 22, 1499 (1980)]

View on Pith 1979

[78] [78]

A. P. Balachandran, G. Marmo, V. P. Nair and C. G. Trahern , A Nonperturbative Proof Of The Nonabelian Anomalies, Phys. Rev. D 25, 2713 (1982)

View on Pith 1982

[79] [79]

S. Randjbar-Daemi and J. A. Strathdee, On the overlap fo rmulation of chiral gauge theory, Phys. Lett. B 348, 543 (1995) [arXiv:hep-th/9412165]; S. Randjbar-Daemi and J. A. Strathdee, Gravitational Loren tz anomaly from the overlap formula in two-dimensions, Phys. Rev. D 51, 6617 (1995) [arXiv:hep-th/9501012]; S. Randjbar-Daemi and J. A. Strathdee, Chiral...

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1995

[80] [80]

A. P. Balachandran, T. R. Govindarajan and B. Ydri, The f ermion doubling problem and noncommutative geometry, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 15, 1279 (2000) [arXiv:hep-th/9911087]. A. P. Balachandran, T. R. Govindarajan and B. Ydri, The fermi on doubling problem and noncommutative geometry. II, arXiv:hep-th/000621. BIBLIOGRAPHY 133

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2000

[81] [81]

A. Bassetto and L. Griguolo, Journ. of Math. Phys. 32 (1991) 3195

View on Pith 1991

[82] [82]

H. Aoki, S. Iso and K. Nagao, Chiral anomaly on fuzzy 2-sp here, Phys. Rev. D 67, 065018 (2003) [arXiv:hep-th/0209137]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2003

[83] [83]

J. Madore, S. Schraml, P. Schupp and J. Wess, Gauge theor y on noncommutative spaces, Eur. Phys. J. C 16, 161 (2000) [arXiv:hep-th/0001203]; X. Calmet, B. Jurco, P. Schupp, J. Wess and M. Wohlgenannt, Th e standard model on non-commutative space-time, Eur. Phys. J. C 23, 363 (2002) [arXiv:hep-ph/0111115]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2000

[84] [84]

N. Seiberg and E. Witten, String theory and noncommutat ive geometry, JHEP 9909, 032 (1999) [arXiv:hep-th/9908142]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1999

[85] [85]

B. Ydri, Ph.D. Thesis, Syracuse University, NY,2001, a rXiv:hep-th/0110006; B. Ydri, Noncommutative chiral anomaly and the Dirac-Ginsp arg-Wilson operator, JHEP 0308, 046 (2003) [arXiv:hep-th/0211209]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2003

[86] [86]

M. Scheunert, W. Nahm and V. Rittenberg, Graded Lie Alge bras: Generalization Of Her- mitian Representations, J. Math. Phys. 18, 146 (1977)

View on Pith 1977

[87] [87]

M. Scheunert, W. Nahm and V. Rittenberg, Irreducible Re presentations Of The Osp(2,1) And Spl(2,1) Graded Lie Algebras, J. Math. Phys. 18, 155 (1977)

View on Pith 1977

[88] [88]

A. Pais and V. Rittenberg, Semisimple Graded Lie Algebr as, J. Math. Phys. 16, 2062 (1975) [Erratum-ibid. 17, 598 (1976)]

View on Pith 1975

[89] [89]

B. Dewitt, Supermanifolds, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1985); M. Scheunert, The Theory of Lie Superalgebras , Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1979)

View on Pith 1985

[90] [90]

J. F. Cornwell, Group Theory in Physics Vol. III , Academic Press, San Diego (1989)

View on Pith 1989

[91] [91]

L. Frappat, A. Sciarrino, P. Sorba, Dictionary on Lie Su peralgebras, hep-th/9607161

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[92] [92]

M. Chaichian, D. Ellinas and P. Preˇ snajder, Path Integ rals And Supercoherent States, J. Math. Phys. 32, 3381 (1991)

View on Pith 1991

[93] [93]

A. El Gradechi and L. M. Nieto, Supercoherent states, su perKahler geometry and geometric quantization, Commun. Math. Phys., 175 (1996) 521, and hep-th/9403109; A. M. El Gradechi, On the supersymplectic homogeneous super space underlying the OSp(1/2) coherent states,” J. Math. Phys. 34, 5951 (1993)

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1996

[94] [94]

M. Bordemann, M. Brischle, C. Emmrich and S. Waldmann, s ubalgebras with convering star products in deformation quantization: An algebraic constr uction for CPn, J. Math. Phys., 37 (1996) 6311; q-alg/9512019; M. Bordemann, M. Brischle, C. Emmrich and S. Waldmann, Lett. Math. Phys., 36 (1996) 357; S. Waldmann, Lett. Math. Phys., 44 (1998) 331. 134 BIBLIOGRAPHY

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1996

[95] [95]

F. A. Berezin and V. N. Tolstoi, The Group With Grassmann Structure Uosp(1,2), Commun. Math. Phys. 78, 409 (1981). F. A. Berezin, Introduction to Superanalysis, D.Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Hol- land (1987)

View on Pith 1981

[96] [96]

A. P. Balachandran, G.Marmo, B. S. Skagerstam and A. Ste rn, Supersymmetric Point Par- ticles And Monopoles With No Strings, Nucl. Phys. B164 (1980) 427; G. Landi and G. Marmo, Phy. Lett. B193 (1987) 61-66. Extensions Of Lie Superalgebras And Supersymmetric Abelian Gauge Fields,

View on Pith 1980

[97] [97]

C. Fronsdal Essays on Supersymmetry . Mathematical Physics Studies Volume 8, Editor: Fronsdal, C. , Dordrecht, Reidel Pub.Co. 1986

View on Pith 1986

[98] [98]

J. Wess, J. Bagger Princeton series in physics: supersymmetry and supergravi ty, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1983

View on Pith 1983

[99] [99]

A. P. Balachandran, A. Pinzul and B. Qureshi, SUSY anoma lies break N = 2 to N = 1: The supersphere and the fuzzy supersphere, arXiv:hep-th/0506 037

View on Pith

[100] [100]

C. Klimcik, A nonperturbative regularization of the s upersymmetric Schwinger model, Commun. Math. Phys. 206, 567 (1999) [arXiv:hep-th/9903112]; C. Klimcik, An extended fuzzy supersphere and twisted chira l superﬁelds, Commun. Math. Phys. 206, 587 (1999) [arXiv:hep-th/9903202]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1999

[101] [101]

S. Kurkcuoglu, Non-linear sigma models on the fuzzy su persphere, JHEP 0403, 062 (2004) [arXiv:hep-th/0311031]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2004

[102] [102]

E. Witten, A Supersymmetric Form Of The Nonlinear Sigm a Model In Two-Dimensions, Phys. Rev. D 16, 2991 (1977)

View on Pith 1977

[103] [103]

P. Di Vecchia and S. Ferrara, Classical Solutions In Tw o-Dimensional Supersymmetric Field Theories, Nucl. Phys. B 130, 93 (1977)

View on Pith 1977

[104] [104]

M. E. Sweedler Hopf Algebras, W. A. Benjamin, New York, 1969. A. A. Kirillov, Elements of the Theory of Representations , Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1976

View on Pith 1969

[105] [105]

G. Mack and V. Schomerus, QuasiHopf quantum symmetry i n quantum theory, Nucl. Phys. B 370, 185 (1992); G. Mack and V. Schomerus in New symmetry principles in Quantum Field Theory , Edited by J.Frohlich et al., Plenum Press, New York, 1992; G. Mack and V. Schomerus, Quantum symmetry for pedestrians, preprint, DESY-92-053

View on Pith 1992

[106] [106]

A. P. Balachandran and S. Kurkcuoglu, Topology change for fuzzy physics: Fuzzy spaces as Hopf algebras, arXiv:hep-th/0310026

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[107] [107]

R. Figari, R. H¨ oegh-Krohn and C. R. Nappi, Interactin g relativistic boson ﬁelds in the de Sitter universe with two space-time dimensions, Commun. Ma th. Phys. 44, 265 (1975). BIBLIOGRAPHY 135

View on Pith 1975

[108] [108]

J. Pawelczyk and H. Steinacker, A quantum algebraic de scription of D-branes on group manifolds, Nucl. Phys. B 638, 433 (2002) [arXiv:hep-th/0203110]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2002

[109] [109]

A. P. Balachandran and C. G. Trahern Lectures on Group Theory for Physicists , Mono- graphs and Textbooks in Physical Science, Bibliopolis, Nap oli, 1984

View on Pith 1984

[110] [110]

A. P. Balachandran, E. Batista, I. P. Costa e Silva and P . Teotonio-Sobrinho, Quantum topology change in (2+1)d, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 15, 1629 (2000) [arXiv:hep-th/9905136]; A. P. Balachandran, E. Batista, I. P. Costa e Silva and P. Teot onio-Sobrinho, The spin-statistics connection in quantum gravity, Nucl. P hys. B 566, 441 (2000) [arXiv:hep-th/9906174...

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2000

[111] [111]

S. Dascalescu, C. Nastasescu, S. Raianu Hopf algebras : an introduction , New York, Marcel Dekker, 2001 . Relation of Fuzzy Physics to Brane physics have been investi gated. Some articles on this subject are:

View on Pith 2001

[112] [112]

A. Y. Alekseev, A. Recknagel and V. Schomerus, Non-com mutative world-volume geome- tries: Branes on SU(2) and fuzzy spheres, JHEP 9909, 023 (1999) [arXiv:hep-th/9908040]. A. Y. Alekseev, A. Recknagel and V. Schomerus, Open strings a nd non-commutative geome- try of branes on group manifolds, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 16, 325 (2001) [arXiv:hep-th/0104054]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1999

[113] [113]

C. Klimcik and P. Severa, Open strings and D-branes in W ZNW models, Nucl. Phys. B 488, 653 (1997) [arXiv:hep-th/9609112]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1997

[114] [114]

A. Y. Alekseev and V. Schomerus, D-branes in the WZW mod el, Phys. Rev. D 60, 061901 (1999) [arXiv:hep-th/9812193]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1999

[115] [115]

K. Gawedzki, Conformal ﬁeld theory: A case study, arXi v:hep-th/9904145

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[116] [116]

H. Garcia-Compean and J. F. Plebanski, D-branes on gro up manifolds and deformation quantization, Nucl. Phys. B 618, 81 (2001) [arXiv:hep-th/9907183]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2001

[117] [117]

R. C. Myers, Dielectric-branes, JHEP 9912, 022 (1999) [arXiv:hep-th/9910053]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1999

[118] [118]

S. P. Trivedi and S. Vaidya, Fuzzy cosets and their grav ity duals, JHEP 0009, 041 (2000) [arXiv:hep-th/0007011]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2000

[119] [119]

S. R. Das, S. P. Trivedi and S. Vaidya, Magnetic moments of branes and giant gravitons, JHEP 0010, 037 (2000) [arXiv:hep-th/0008203]. Quantum ﬁeld theories on fuzzy spaces are also studied via nu merical methods. Some articles on this subject are:

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2000

[120] [120]

X. Martin, A matrix phase for the phi**4 scalar ﬁeld on t he fuzzy sphere, JHEP 0404, 077 (2004) [arXiv:hep-th/0402230]. 136 BIBLIOGRAPHY

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2004

[121] [121]

T. Azuma, S. Bal, K. Nagao and J. Nishimura, Nonperturb ative studies of fuzzy spheres in a matrix model with the Chern-Simons term,” JHEP 0405, 005 (2004) [arXiv:hep-th/0401038]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2004