Pith. Sign in

RECORD

A One Loop Problem of the Matrix Big Bang Model

PaperPDF from arXiv

data files

Paper breakdownThe authors' claims, conditions and measurements, as JSON Signed receiptProof this review has not been altered
X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit Hacker News
Miao Li, Wei Song

High Energy Physics - Theory · Submitted 30 Dec 2005

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim This term is complex and signals an instability of the two D0-brane system, it may also indicate that the matrix model is incorrect.

how it is stated · hedged possibility 0.72 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDhep-th/0512335 (version 4)
Pith ID4XWU7WVU, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationMiao Li, Wei Song. "A One Loop Problem of the Matrix Big Bang Model." arXiv:hep-th/0512335 (2005). https://pith.science/paper/4XWU7WVU
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,911 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.85 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.12 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.18 · compares with prior results 0.94 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v4. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We compute the one-loop effective action of two D0-branes in the matrix model for a cosmological background, and find vanishing static potential. However, there is a non-vanishing $v^2$ term not predicted in a supergravity calculation. This term is complex and signals an instability of the two D0-brane system, it may also indicate that the matrix model is incorrect.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We compute the one-loop effective action of two D0-branes in the matrix model for a cosmological background, and find vanishing static potential. result 0.76 0.97 0.31 asserted 1.00
s1 However, there is a non-vanishing $v^2$ term not predicted in a supergravity calculation. result 1.00 0.85 0.19 asserted 1.00
s2 This term is complex and signals an instability of the two D0-brane system, it may also indicate that the matrix model is incorrect. interpretation 1.00 0.72 0.55 hedged possibility 0.72

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.67.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v4
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We compute the one-loop effective action of two D0-branes in the matrix model for a cosmological background, and find vanishing static potential. However, there is a non-vanishing $v^2$ term not predicted in a supergravity calculation. This term is complex and signals an instability of the two D0-brane system, it may also indicate that the matrix model is incorrect.

Human review

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

References
How the literature uses it

1 arXiv paper cite this in 2 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.