Geometry of type II common sector N=2 backgrounds

G. Papadopoulos; P. Lohrmann; U. Gran

REVIEW

Geometry of type II common sector N=2 backgrounds

U. Gran, P. Lohrmann, G. Papadopoulos

High Energy Physics - Theory · Submitted 23 Feb 2006 · 34 references

Pith's verdict: A credible, citable classification paper; the completeness claim rests on asserted linear-system inputs that referees should ask the authors to expose.

T0 · AI review

How this review was made: An AI referee (deepseek-v4-flash) read the paper on August 28, 2026 and answered a fixed list of questions about it. T0 is the starting level every paper gets. The levels describe how deeply Pith has checked the paper, never the authors.

T0 AI review An AI read the paper and answered a fixed list of questions.
T1 Audit Automatic checks that the references and files the paper relies on exist and match.
T2 Compute The paper's code or calculations re-run with the same results.
T3 Formal statement The claims written out in a formal math language a computer can read.
T4 Proof Those claims proved, and the proof checked by computer.

How Pith checks papers →

· 4 major objections · 4 minor · Ask about this paper · The compiled record · Read the full review →

Challenge this review Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗

Cite ▾

arXiv IDhep-th/0602250 (version 1)

Pith ID22URS4VZ, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review

CitationG. Papadopoulos, P. Lohrmann, U. Gran. "Geometry of type II common sector N=2 backgrounds." arXiv:hep-th/0602250 (2006). https://pith.science/paper/22URS4VZ

Cite this reviewBibTeX for Pith's review of this paper

Claim paper

Why Pith says this

Highlight any text to comment on it.

Editor's note

read the letter

Punchline: this is a credible classification paper that completes the N-hat=N-check=1 common-sector story for both IIA and IIB, and the main geometric dichotomy—pp-wave vs null fibre bundle—is well argued. The soft spot is not the math as far as I can tell; it is that the completeness claim rests on two sets of input data that are asserted rather than demonstrated here.

What is new: the full solution of both chirality copies, the IIA cases, the K ↔ K⋊R8 exchange under T-duality, and the light-cone application. The form bilinear computations and the matching of base-space geometries are done carefully, and the paper fits cleanly into the spinorial-geometry programme.

Where I would press: Section 2 and the start of each case read the linear systems off from [1], which was unpublished at submission. Appendix B is the genuinely new input for IIA negative-chirality spinors, and it is stated with 'one finds' and no derivation. If any sign, coefficient, or orbit representative is wrong, Tables 1–2 and the 'all backgrounds' claim fail. That is a real burden, but a standard one for this type of paper; the right fix is to require [1] to be in final published form and to expand the Appendix B computation or cross-check it. The field-equation reductions in Sections 3.1.3 and 3.3.3 are also deferred as 'straightforward'; that is secondary, but worth an appendix or a footnote.

I see no evidence that anything is actually wrong. The internal consistency is good, and the T-duality correspondence is plausible and consonant with known Buscher rules. The heavy self-citation is legitimate—the cited paper is the foundation of the programme, not a fitted parameter.

Bottom line: this deserves a serious referee. I would send it out with a request for fuller derivations of the linear-system inputs and the field-equation reductions. A specialist in supersymmetric backgrounds will get real value from it, and it is a citable result.

Referee report

Significance

If the classification is correct, this is a substantial and useful result: it gives a complete list of geometric structures for all type II common-sector N=2 backgrounds, with concrete metrics, fluxes, and dilaton ansaetze, and it demonstrates a clean T-duality relation between the two families of stability subgroups. The use of spinorial geometry and G-structure techniques is systematic, and the paper makes explicit falsifiable statements: the geometries are either pp-waves over a K-manifold or rank-two fibre bundles over a K-manifold, with specific torsion classes. The strengths include the explicit derivation of geometric conditions from spinor bilinears, the treatment of both IIA and IIB chiralities, the integrability-condition analysis connecting Killing spinor equations to field equations, and the light-cone gauge-fixing construction. The main caveat is that the completeness of the classification is not fully established within this manuscript: it inherits the orbit classification and linear-system data of the companion paper [1] (unpublished at the time of submission), and the IIA negative-chirality linear system is presented in Appendix B without derivation.

Major objections (4)

[§3.1.3 and §3.3.3] The claim that the Killing spinor equations imply all field equations once dH=0 and either E_{--}=0 or L H_{-+}=0 are imposed is stated as 'a straightforward calculation reveals' and 'after some computation', but no details are given. This implication is a central result of the paper, and the integrability conditions in Appendix A are not obviously sufficient to derive the full set of field equations for all the geometric classes. The authors should either reproduce the calculation in an appendix or point to a published derivation; otherwise the statement is unverifiable from the manuscript.
[Appendix B in conjunction with §4] The linear system for the IIA negative-chirality Killing spinor equations, stated in (B.1)–(B.10), is presented with the phrase 'one finds' and no derivation. The entire IIA classification in Section 4—including the supersymmetry conditions (4.2), (4.7), (4.14) and the resulting geometries (4.5), (4.12), (4.18)—depends directly on these formulas. A single sign error or missing term in this linear system would invalidate the IIA completeness claim. The authors should provide the derivation or at least a verifiable intermediate step, rather than leaving the formulas as assertions.
[Section 2 and Section 3.1.1, Tables 1–2] The completeness of the classification rests on the orbit classification and linear-system results of the companion paper [1] (arXiv:hep-th/0510176), which at submission was an unpublished preprint. The IIB cases in Section 3 use those results directly, with H→−H for the second copy, and the IIA case also borrows the positive-chirality linear system from [1]. If [1] is not available to the reader (or contains an error), the claim that Tables 1–2 list 'all' N=2 common-sector backgrounds is unsupported. The authors should either include the necessary orbit classification data in the present paper or make the dependence on [1] explicit and ensure that [1] is published or otherwise accessible.
[Section 2.2, Eq. (2.8)] The commutator formulas [X-hat, X-check]=0 for a hat-nabla-parallel and a check-nabla-parallel vector field are stated without derivation. Since these relations are used later to conclude that the two null vector fields commute and that the spacetime is a fibre bundle, the derivation (or a reference to a derivation) should be provided, particularly because the analogous commutators for two parallel vector fields of the same connection are not zero in general.

Minor objections (4)

[Section 4.2] In the sentence 'setting g1 + g2 = g2 eiλ', the left-hand side appears to be a typo for g1 + i g2; as written, the condition cannot produce the complex phase eiλ that is used in the subsequent equations.
[Section 3.3.2 and Section 4.3.2] The definitions of the G2-structure forms ϕ, χ-hat, and ω-hat are given in Section 3.3.1 but then used in Section 4.3 without restatement; a cross-reference to the defining equations would improve readability.
[Appendix B] The index-range description 'the range of the Greek indices determined by the number of Greek indices on the left hand side' is ambiguous; a concrete statement of which indices run from 1 to 4 and which are holomorphic or anti-holomorphic would clarify the formulas.
[Section 4.1.1] In eq. (4.5) the dilaton is written as eΦ = f^2, but earlier in eq. (4.3) the conditions ∂+Φ = ∂−Φ = 0 are imposed; the consistency of these two statements is not discussed (the former implies Φ depends only on the base coordinates, which is fine, but the relation to f should be stated explicitly).

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

The paper

The paper claims

The geometry of every type II N=2 common-sector background is now classified.

The reading

This paper determines the spacetime geometry of all type II common-sector supergravity backgrounds with exactly two supersymmetries, one from each copy of the Killing spinor equations. The central finding is that each such background is one of two types fixed by the common stability subgroup $K$ (Spin(7), SU(4), or G2) of the two Killing spinors: if the stability subgroup is $K\ltimes\mathbb{R}^8$, the spacetime is a pp-wave propagating in an eight-manifold with a $K$-structure; if it is $K$, the spacetime is a rank-two fibre bundle over an eight-manifold with a $K$-structure, with the fibre spanned by two commuting null Killing fields. The IIA and IIB classes are exchanged by the semidirect product: for example, IIA Spin(7) corresponds to IIB Spin(7)$\ltimes\mathbb{R}^8$. The paper further shows that all field equations follow from supersymmetry once $dH=0$ and one additional condition ($E_{--}=0$ or $L H_{-+}=0$) are imposed, and that the light-cone gauge can always be fixed for string world-sheet actions in these backgrounds.

What carries the argument

The machinery is spinorial geometry together with the Killing-spinor bilinears the spinors produce. Spinors are organized by their orbits under Spin(9,1); for two spinors the common stability subgroup is computed by conjugating the stabilizers of the two copies. The heterotic-string linear systems (with $H$ and $-H$) provide the supersymmetry conditions for the positive-chirality copy in both IIA and IIB, and a new negative-chirality linear system, evaluated in Appendix B, does the same for the IIA second copy. Solving these linear systems determines the Levi-Civita connection components, the flux $H$, and the dilaton. The geometric output is read from the parallel bilinears: a parallel null one-form gives a pp-wave, viewed as a Lorentzian deformation family of an eight-manifold, and two commuting null parallel vector fields give a rank-two fibre bundle over the eight-manifold. The torsion is largely determined by the geometry, with the remaining components lying in the Lie algebra $k$ of $K$.

Extended reading notes

Core claim

For type IIB, the paper proves that the N=2 common-sector backgrounds with one Killing spinor per copy fall into exactly three classes, with common stability subgroup $G=$Spin(7)$\ltimes\mathbb{R}^8$, SU(4)$\ltimes\mathbb{R}^8$, or G2; for type IIA the classes have $G=$Spin(7), SU(4), or G2$\ltimes\mathbb{R}^8$. In the $K\ltimes\mathbb{R}^8$ cases the metric and three-form can be put in the pp-wave form (1.2), $ds^2=2dv(du+Vdv+n)+\delta_{ij}e^ie^j$, with $H$ taking values in the appropriate subalgebra of $\mathfrak{so}(8)$ apart from a free $k$-valued component, and the transverse space is an eight-manifold $B$ with a $K$-structure. In the $K$ cases the metric and three-form take the fibre-bundle form (1.3), $ds^2=2f^4(dv+m)(du+n)+\delta_{ij}e^ie^j$, with $H=d(e^-\wedge e^+)+\frac{1}{3!}H_{ijk}e^i\wedge e^j\wedge e^k$, and the base space $B$ is an eight-manifold with the same $K$-structure. The paper also shows that the base geometry in the fibre-bundle case is exactly the same as the deformed transverse geometry in the corresponding pp-wave case, and that T-duality along one null isometry interchanges the two classes, i.e. $K\leftrightarrow K\ltimes\mathbb{R}^8$.

Load-bearing premise

The claim to classify 'all' N=2 backgrounds rests on the completeness of the Spin(9,1) orbit classification and of the heterotic linear-system conditions taken from the companion heterotic-string paper, together with the correctness of their transfer to the negative-chirality IIA copy in Appendix B; if any orbit representative or linear-system condition is missing, the tables and the classification would be incomplete.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

For the $K\ltimes\mathbb{R}^8$ class, each solution is a pp-wave of the form (1.2) determined by an eight-manifold with a $K$-structure plus free functions: $V$, $n$, the dilaton, and a $k$-valued $H_{-ij}$ component.
For the $K$ class, each solution is a rank-two fibre bundle of the form (1.3) over an eight-manifold with the same $K$-structure, with $H=d(e^-\wedge e^+)$ plus a transverse component fixed by the geometry; in the Spin(7) case the transverse component $H_{ijk}$ vanishes.
In every case, imposing $dH=0$ together with either $E_{--}=0$ (pp-wave class) or $L H_{-+}=0$ (fibre-bundle class) makes all remaining type II common-sector field equations follow from the Killing spinor equations.
T-duality along a null isometry maps IIA backgrounds with $K$-invariant spinors to IIB backgrounds with $K\ltimes\mathbb{R}^8$-invariant spinors, and conversely, with the same eight-dimensional base geometry.
String world-sheet actions in any background with at least one Killing spinor in each copy can be gauge-fixed to the light-cone; the resulting actions are given explicitly, and in the fibre-bundle case they possess two chiral U(1) currents.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the classification is complete, constructing every local N=2 common-sector solution reduces to choosing an eight-manifold with a Spin(7), SU(4), or G2 structure and solving the explicit differential conditions given in the paper; a natural test is to build new examples from known holonomy manifolds and verify the flux formulas.
The same spinorial-geometry method should extend to N>2 backgrounds, where the paper notes that more than a hundred geometries may appear because of different embeddings of stabilizers; working out that classification would be a direct continuation of this paper's programme.
The observation that mixed-chirality bilinears are not conserved world-sheet currents suggests that the SU(4) cases do not yield enhanced (2,1) or (1,2) world-sheet supersymmetry; a direct sigma-model computation of the current algebra would test this.
The claimed T-duality correspondence could be verified explicitly by taking the fundamental-string-like Spin(7) IIA solution, T-dualizing along one null direction, and checking that the result is an IIB pp-wave of the form (1.2) with the same transverse Spin(7) manifold.

Original abstract

We describe the geometry of all type II common sector backgrounds with two supersymmetries. In particular, we determine the spacetime geometry of those supersymmetric backgrounds for which each copy of the Killing spinor equations admits a Killing spinor. The stability subgroups of both Killing spinors are $Spin(7)\ltimes \bR^8$, $SU(4)\ltimes \bR^8$ and $G_2$ for IIB backgrounds, and $Spin(7)$, SU(4) and $G_2\ltimes \bR^8$ for IIA backgrounds. We show that the spacetime of backgrounds with spinors that have stability subgroup $K\ltimes \bR^8$ is a pp-wave propagating in an eight-dimensional manifold with a $K$-structure. The spacetime of backgrounds with $K$-invariant Killing spinors is a fibre bundle with fibre spanned by the orbits of two commuting null Killing vector fields and base space an eight-dimensional manifold which admits a $K$-structure. Type II T-duality interchanges the backgrounds with $K$- and $K\ltimes\bR^8$-invariant Killing spinors. We show that the geometries of the base space of the fibre bundle and the corresponding space in which the pp-wave propagates are the same. The conformal symmetry of the world-sheet action of type II strings propagating in these N=2 backgrounds can always be fixed in the light-cone gauge.

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged, kept beside the review and separate from it. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 6,496 input tokens, $0.0003 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.14 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.01 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.15 · compares with prior results 0.07 · mentions code or data availability 0.01.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; show every role.

We describe the geometry of all type II common sector backgrounds with two supersymmetries. In particular, we determine the spacetime geometry of those supersymmetric backgrounds for which each copy of the Killing spinor equations admits a Killing spinor. The stability subgroups of both Killing spinors are $Spin(7)\ltimes \bR^8$, $SU(4)\ltimes \bR^8$ and $G_2$ for IIB backgrounds, and $Spin(7)$, SU(4) and $G_2\ltimes \bR^8$ for IIA backgrounds. We show that the spacetime of backgrounds with spinors that have stability subgroup $K\ltimes \bR^8$ is a pp-wave propagating in an eight-dimensional manifold with a $K$-structure. The spacetime of backgrounds with $K$-invariant Killing spinors is a fibre bundle with fibre spanned by the orbits of two commuting null Killing vector fields and base space an eight-dimensional manifold which admits a $K$-structure. Type II T-duality interchanges the backgrounds with $K$- and $K\ltimes\bR^8$-invariant Killing spinors. We show that the geometries of the base space of the fibre bundle and the corresponding space in which the pp-wave propagates are the same. The conformal symmetry of the world-sheet action of type II strings propagating in these N=2 backgrounds can always be fixed in the light-cone gauge.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#	sentence	role	the authors' own work	states the main conclusion	strength
s0	We describe the geometry of all type II common sector backgrounds with two supersymmetries.	contribution 0.99	0.93	0.17	asserted 1.00
s1	In particular, we determine the spacetime geometry of those supersymmetric backgrounds for which each copy of the Killing spinor equations admits a Killing spinor.	contribution 0.91	0.93	0.12	asserted 1.00
s2	The stability subgroups of both Killing spinors are $Spin(7)\ltimes \bR^8$, $SU(4)\ltimes \bR^8$ and $G_2$ for IIB backgrounds, and $Spin(7)$, SU(4) and $G_2\ltimes \bR^8$ for IIA backgrounds.	result 0.99	0.84	0.19	asserted 1.00
s3	We show that the spacetime of backgrounds with spinors that have stability subgroup $K\ltimes \bR^8$ is a pp-wave propagating in an eight-dimensional manifold with a $K$-structure.	result 1.00	0.91	0.20	asserted 1.00
s4	The spacetime of backgrounds with $K$-invariant Killing spinors is a fibre bundle with fibre spanned by the orbits of two commuting null Killing vector fields and base space an eight-dimensional manifold which admits a $K$-structure.	result 1.00	0.88	0.18	asserted 1.00
s5	Type II T-duality interchanges the backgrounds with $K$- and $K\ltimes\bR^8$-invariant Killing spinors.	result 0.97	0.64	0.14	asserted 1.00
s6	We show that the geometries of the base space of the fibre bundle and the corresponding space in which the pp-wave propagates are the same.	result 0.99	0.93	0.18	asserted 1.00
s7	The conformal symmetry of the world-sheet action of type II strings propagating in these N=2 backgrounds can always be fixed in the light-cone gauge.	result 0.94	0.78	0.07	asserted 0.97

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read

arXiv listing abstract v1

not examined

full text
figures and tables
references and citing sentences
relations to other papers

levels run

P abstract

not run

S sections
T body sentences
C citations
R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

References

Works cited (34)

[1]

U. Gran, P. Lohrmann and G. Papadopoulos, “The spinorial geometry of supersymmetric heterotic string backgrounds,” arXiv:hep-th/0510176

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[2]

J. Gillard, U. Gran and G. Papadopoulos, “The spinorial g eometry of supersymmetric backgrounds,” Class. Quant. Grav. 22 (2005) 1033 [arXiv:hep-th/0410155]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2005
[3]

A. Strominger, “Superstrings with torsion,” Nucl. Phys . B 274, 253 (1986)

View on Pith 1986
[4]

C. M. Hull, “Compactiﬁcations of the heterotic superstr ing,” Phys. Lett. B 178 (1986) 357

View on Pith 1986
[5]

G. Papadopoulos and A. A. Tseytlin, “Complex geometry of conifolds and 5-brane wrapped on 2-sphere,” Class. Quant. Grav. 18 (2001) 1333 [arXiv:hep-th/0012034]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2001
[6]

C. G. . Callan, J. A. Harvey and A. Strominger, “Supersymm etric string solitons,” arXiv:hep-th/9112030

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[7]

J. Gillard, G. Papadopoulos and D. Tsimpis, “Anomaly, ﬂu xes and (2,0) heterotic-string compactiﬁcations,” JHEP 0306 (2003) 035 [arXiv:hep-th/0304126]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2003
[8]

G. L. Cardoso, G. Curio, G. Dall’Agata and D. Lust, “BPS ac tion and superpotential for heterotic string compactiﬁcations with ﬂuxes,” JHEP 0310 (2003) 004 [arXiv:hep- th/0306088]

View on Pith arXiv 2003
[9]

P. S. Howe and G. Papadopoulos, “Twistor spaces for HKT ma nifolds,” Phys. Lett. B 379 (1996) 80 [arXiv:hep-th/9602108]. P. S. Howe, A. Opfermann and G. Papadopoulos, “Twistor space s for QKT manifolds,” Commun. Math. Phys. 197 (1998) 713 [arXiv:hep-th/9710072]. 27

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1996
[10]

G. Grantcharov and Y. S. Poon, “Geometry of hyper-K¨ ahl er connections with torsion”, Commun.Math.Phys. 213 (2000) 19-37, [math.DG/9908015]

View on Pith arXiv 2000
[11]

S. Ivanov and G. Papadopoulos, “A no-go theorem for stri ng warped compactiﬁcations,” Phys. Lett. B 497 (2001) 309 [arXiv:hep-th/0008232]. “Vanishing theorems and string backgrounds,” Class. Quant . Grav. 18 (2001) 1089 [arXiv:math.dg/0010038]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2001
[12]

J. Gutowski, S. Ivanov and G. Papadopoulos, “Deformati ons of generalized calibrations and compact non-Kahler manifolds with vanishing ﬁrst Chern class,” Asian J. Math. 7 (2003), 39-80 [arXiv:math.dg/0205012]

View on Pith arXiv 2003
[13]

A. Fino, M. Parton, S. Salamon, “Families of strong KT st ructures in six dimensions”, [math.DG/0209259]

View on Pith arXiv
[14]

E. Goldstein and S. Prokushkin, “Geometric model for co mplex non-Kaehler manifolds with SU(3) structure,” Commun. Math. Phys. 251 (2004), 65 [arXiv:hep-th/0212307]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2004
[15]

D. Grantcharov, G. Grantcharov, Y. S. Poon, “Calabi-Ya u connections with torsion on toric bundles” [math.DG/0306207]

View on Pith arXiv
[16]

T. Friedrich, S. Ivanov, “Parallel spinors and connect ions with skew-symmetric torsion in string theory” Asian Journal of Mathematics 6 (2002), 303-336 [math.DG/0102142]. “Killing spinor equations in dimension 7 and geometry of int egrable G2-manifolds” J. Geom. Phys. 48 (2003), 1-11 [math.DG/0112201]

View on Pith arXiv 2002
[17]

S. Ivanov, “Connection with torsion, parallel spinors and geometry of Spin(7) manifolds” Math. Res. Lett. 11 (2004), no. 2-3, 171–186 [math.DG/0111216]

View on Pith arXiv 2004
[18]

J. P. Gauntlett, D. Martelli, S. Pakis and D. Waldram, “G -structures and wrapped NS5- branes,” Commun. Math. Phys. 247 (2004) 421 [arXiv:hep-th/0205050]. J. P. Gauntlett, D. Martelli and D. Waldram, “Superstrings w ith intrinsic torsion,” Phys. Rev. D 69 (2004) 086002 [arXiv:hep-th/0302158]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2004
[19]

G. L. Cardoso, G. Curio, G. Dall’Agata, D. Lust, P. Manou sselis and G. Zoupanos, “Non- Kaehler string backgrounds and their ﬁve torsion classes,” Nucl. Phys. B 652 (2003) 5 [arXiv:hep-th/0211118]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2003
[20]

J. M. Figueroa-O’Farrill, “Breaking the M-waves,” Cla ss. Quant. Grav. 17 (2000) 2925 [arXiv:hep-th/9904124]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2000
[21]

U. Gran, G. Papadopoulos and D. Roest, “Systematics of M -theory spinorial geometry,” Class. Quant. Grav. 22 (2005) 2701 [arXiv:hep-th/0503046]. U. Gran, J. Gutowski, G. Papadopoulos and D. Roest, “Systema tics of IIB spinorial geometry,” Class. Quant. Grav. 23 (2006) 1617 [arXiv:hep-th/0507087]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2005
[22]

A. Dabholkar, G. W. Gibbons, J. A. Harvey and F. Ruiz Ruiz , “Superstrings and solitons,” Nucl. Phys. B 340 (1990) 33

View on Pith 1990
[23]

M. B. Green, J. H. Schwarz and E. Witten, “Superstring Th eory. Vol. 1: Introduction,” Cambridge Monographs On Mathematical Physics (1987)

View on Pith 1987
[24]

P. S. Howe and G. Papadopoulos, “Holonomy groups and W sy mmetries,” Commun. Math. Phys. 151 (1993) 467 [arXiv:hep-th/9202036]. 28

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1993
[25]

B. de Wit and P. van Nieuwenhuizen, “Rigidly and locally supersymmetric two- dimensional nonlinear sigma models with torsion,” Nucl. Ph ys. B 312 (1989) 58. G. W. Delius, M. Rocek, A. Sevrin and P. van Nieuwenhuizen, “S upersymmetric sigma models with nonvanishing Nijenhuis tensor and their operat or product expansion,” Nucl. Phys. B 324 (1989) 523

View on Pith 1989
[26]

C. M. Hull, G. Papadopoulos and P. K. Townsend, “Potenti als for (p,0) and (1,1) su- persymmetric sigma models with torsion,” Phys. Lett. B 316 (1993) 291 [arXiv:hep- th/9307013]

View on Pith arXiv 1993
[27]

T. H. Buscher, “A symmetry of the string background ﬁeld equations,” Phys. Lett. B 194 (1987) 59

View on Pith 1987
[28]

J. Dai, R. G. Leigh and J. Polchinski, “New connections b etween string theories,” Mod. Phys. Lett. A 4 (1989) 2073

View on Pith 1989
[29]

M. Dine, P. Y. Huet and N. Seiberg, “Large and small radiu s in string theory,” Nucl. Phys. B 322 (1989) 301

View on Pith 1989
[30]

E. Bergshoeﬀ, C. M. Hull and T. Ortin, “Duality in the type II superstring eﬀective action,” Nucl. Phys. B 451 (1995) 547 [arXiv:hep-th/9504081]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1995
[31]

B. de Wit, D. J. Smit and N. D. Hari Dass, “Residual supers ymmetry of compactiﬁed D = 10 supergravity,” Nucl. Phys. B 283 (1987) 165

View on Pith 1987
[32]

S. Chiossi and S. Salamon, “The intrinsic torsion of SU (3) and G2-structures”, Diﬀ. Geom., Valencia 2001, World Sci. 2002, 115 [arXiv:math.DG/ 0202282]

View on Pith 2001
[33]

F. M. Cabrera, “Special almost Hermitian geometry,” ma th.DG/0409167

View on Pith arXiv
[34]

A. Gray and L.M. Hervella, “The sixteen classes of almos t Hermitian manifolds and their linear invariants”, Ann. Mat. Pura e Appl. 282 (1980) 1. 29

View on Pith 1980

How the literature uses it

4 arXiv papers cite this in 6 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 5 sentences without a confident label

Builds on it 1 paper

This would extend the work of [ref] .

Supersymmetric heterotic string backgrounds · Introduction · 0.93

Discussion

Disagree with the review, or know something it missed? Leave a comment, highlight any passage above to comment on it, or challenge this review formally.

[1] [1]

U. Gran, P. Lohrmann and G. Papadopoulos, “The spinorial geometry of supersymmetric heterotic string backgrounds,” arXiv:hep-th/0510176

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[2] [2]

J. Gillard, U. Gran and G. Papadopoulos, “The spinorial g eometry of supersymmetric backgrounds,” Class. Quant. Grav. 22 (2005) 1033 [arXiv:hep-th/0410155]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2005

[3] [3]

A. Strominger, “Superstrings with torsion,” Nucl. Phys . B 274, 253 (1986)

View on Pith 1986

[4] [4]

C. M. Hull, “Compactiﬁcations of the heterotic superstr ing,” Phys. Lett. B 178 (1986) 357

View on Pith 1986

[5] [5]

G. Papadopoulos and A. A. Tseytlin, “Complex geometry of conifolds and 5-brane wrapped on 2-sphere,” Class. Quant. Grav. 18 (2001) 1333 [arXiv:hep-th/0012034]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2001

[6] [6]

C. G. . Callan, J. A. Harvey and A. Strominger, “Supersymm etric string solitons,” arXiv:hep-th/9112030

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[7] [7]

J. Gillard, G. Papadopoulos and D. Tsimpis, “Anomaly, ﬂu xes and (2,0) heterotic-string compactiﬁcations,” JHEP 0306 (2003) 035 [arXiv:hep-th/0304126]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2003

[8] [8]

G. L. Cardoso, G. Curio, G. Dall’Agata and D. Lust, “BPS ac tion and superpotential for heterotic string compactiﬁcations with ﬂuxes,” JHEP 0310 (2003) 004 [arXiv:hep- th/0306088]

View on Pith arXiv 2003

[9] [9]

P. S. Howe and G. Papadopoulos, “Twistor spaces for HKT ma nifolds,” Phys. Lett. B 379 (1996) 80 [arXiv:hep-th/9602108]. P. S. Howe, A. Opfermann and G. Papadopoulos, “Twistor space s for QKT manifolds,” Commun. Math. Phys. 197 (1998) 713 [arXiv:hep-th/9710072]. 27

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1996

[10] [10]

G. Grantcharov and Y. S. Poon, “Geometry of hyper-K¨ ahl er connections with torsion”, Commun.Math.Phys. 213 (2000) 19-37, [math.DG/9908015]

View on Pith arXiv 2000

[11] [11]

S. Ivanov and G. Papadopoulos, “A no-go theorem for stri ng warped compactiﬁcations,” Phys. Lett. B 497 (2001) 309 [arXiv:hep-th/0008232]. “Vanishing theorems and string backgrounds,” Class. Quant . Grav. 18 (2001) 1089 [arXiv:math.dg/0010038]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2001

[12] [12]

J. Gutowski, S. Ivanov and G. Papadopoulos, “Deformati ons of generalized calibrations and compact non-Kahler manifolds with vanishing ﬁrst Chern class,” Asian J. Math. 7 (2003), 39-80 [arXiv:math.dg/0205012]

View on Pith arXiv 2003

[13] [13]

A. Fino, M. Parton, S. Salamon, “Families of strong KT st ructures in six dimensions”, [math.DG/0209259]

View on Pith arXiv

[14] [14]

E. Goldstein and S. Prokushkin, “Geometric model for co mplex non-Kaehler manifolds with SU(3) structure,” Commun. Math. Phys. 251 (2004), 65 [arXiv:hep-th/0212307]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2004

[15] [15]

D. Grantcharov, G. Grantcharov, Y. S. Poon, “Calabi-Ya u connections with torsion on toric bundles” [math.DG/0306207]

View on Pith arXiv

[16] [16]

T. Friedrich, S. Ivanov, “Parallel spinors and connect ions with skew-symmetric torsion in string theory” Asian Journal of Mathematics 6 (2002), 303-336 [math.DG/0102142]. “Killing spinor equations in dimension 7 and geometry of int egrable G2-manifolds” J. Geom. Phys. 48 (2003), 1-11 [math.DG/0112201]

View on Pith arXiv 2002

[17] [17]

S. Ivanov, “Connection with torsion, parallel spinors and geometry of Spin(7) manifolds” Math. Res. Lett. 11 (2004), no. 2-3, 171–186 [math.DG/0111216]

View on Pith arXiv 2004

[18] [18]

J. P. Gauntlett, D. Martelli, S. Pakis and D. Waldram, “G -structures and wrapped NS5- branes,” Commun. Math. Phys. 247 (2004) 421 [arXiv:hep-th/0205050]. J. P. Gauntlett, D. Martelli and D. Waldram, “Superstrings w ith intrinsic torsion,” Phys. Rev. D 69 (2004) 086002 [arXiv:hep-th/0302158]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2004

[19] [19]

G. L. Cardoso, G. Curio, G. Dall’Agata, D. Lust, P. Manou sselis and G. Zoupanos, “Non- Kaehler string backgrounds and their ﬁve torsion classes,” Nucl. Phys. B 652 (2003) 5 [arXiv:hep-th/0211118]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2003

[20] [20]

J. M. Figueroa-O’Farrill, “Breaking the M-waves,” Cla ss. Quant. Grav. 17 (2000) 2925 [arXiv:hep-th/9904124]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2000

[21] [21]

U. Gran, G. Papadopoulos and D. Roest, “Systematics of M -theory spinorial geometry,” Class. Quant. Grav. 22 (2005) 2701 [arXiv:hep-th/0503046]. U. Gran, J. Gutowski, G. Papadopoulos and D. Roest, “Systema tics of IIB spinorial geometry,” Class. Quant. Grav. 23 (2006) 1617 [arXiv:hep-th/0507087]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2005

[22] [22]

A. Dabholkar, G. W. Gibbons, J. A. Harvey and F. Ruiz Ruiz , “Superstrings and solitons,” Nucl. Phys. B 340 (1990) 33

View on Pith 1990

[23] [23]

M. B. Green, J. H. Schwarz and E. Witten, “Superstring Th eory. Vol. 1: Introduction,” Cambridge Monographs On Mathematical Physics (1987)

View on Pith 1987

[24] [24]

P. S. Howe and G. Papadopoulos, “Holonomy groups and W sy mmetries,” Commun. Math. Phys. 151 (1993) 467 [arXiv:hep-th/9202036]. 28

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1993

[25] [25]

B. de Wit and P. van Nieuwenhuizen, “Rigidly and locally supersymmetric two- dimensional nonlinear sigma models with torsion,” Nucl. Ph ys. B 312 (1989) 58. G. W. Delius, M. Rocek, A. Sevrin and P. van Nieuwenhuizen, “S upersymmetric sigma models with nonvanishing Nijenhuis tensor and their operat or product expansion,” Nucl. Phys. B 324 (1989) 523

View on Pith 1989

[26] [26]

C. M. Hull, G. Papadopoulos and P. K. Townsend, “Potenti als for (p,0) and (1,1) su- persymmetric sigma models with torsion,” Phys. Lett. B 316 (1993) 291 [arXiv:hep- th/9307013]

View on Pith arXiv 1993

[27] [27]

T. H. Buscher, “A symmetry of the string background ﬁeld equations,” Phys. Lett. B 194 (1987) 59

View on Pith 1987

[28] [28]

J. Dai, R. G. Leigh and J. Polchinski, “New connections b etween string theories,” Mod. Phys. Lett. A 4 (1989) 2073

View on Pith 1989

[29] [29]

M. Dine, P. Y. Huet and N. Seiberg, “Large and small radiu s in string theory,” Nucl. Phys. B 322 (1989) 301

View on Pith 1989

[30] [30]

E. Bergshoeﬀ, C. M. Hull and T. Ortin, “Duality in the type II superstring eﬀective action,” Nucl. Phys. B 451 (1995) 547 [arXiv:hep-th/9504081]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1995

[31] [31]

B. de Wit, D. J. Smit and N. D. Hari Dass, “Residual supers ymmetry of compactiﬁed D = 10 supergravity,” Nucl. Phys. B 283 (1987) 165

View on Pith 1987

[32] [32]

S. Chiossi and S. Salamon, “The intrinsic torsion of SU (3) and G2-structures”, Diﬀ. Geom., Valencia 2001, World Sci. 2002, 115 [arXiv:math.DG/ 0202282]

View on Pith 2001

[33] [33]

F. M. Cabrera, “Special almost Hermitian geometry,” ma th.DG/0409167

View on Pith arXiv

[34] [34]

A. Gray and L.M. Hervella, “The sixteen classes of almos t Hermitian manifolds and their linear invariants”, Ann. Mat. Pura e Appl. 282 (1980) 1. 29

View on Pith 1980