Dyonic Giant Magnons

Heng-Yu Chen; Keisuke Okamura; Nick Dorey

REVIEW

Dyonic Giant Magnons

Heng-Yu Chen, Nick Dorey, Keisuke Okamura

High Energy Physics - Theory · Submitted 16 May 2006 · 25 references

Pith's verdict: A clean, checkable classical derivation of the two-charge giant magnon and its exact BPS dispersion relation; the soft spots are presentational, not load-bearing.

T0 · AI review

How this review was made: An AI referee (selfhosted/deepseek-v4.1-flash) read the paper on November 11, 2026 and answered a fixed list of questions about it. T0 is the starting level every paper gets. The levels describe how deeply Pith has checked the paper, never the authors.

T0 AI review An AI read the paper and answered a fixed list of questions.
T1 Audit Automatic checks that the references and files the paper relies on exist and match.
T2 Compute The paper's code or calculations re-run with the same results.
T3 Formal statement The claims written out in a formal math language a computer can read.
T4 Proof Those claims proved, and the proof checked by computer.

How Pith checks papers →

· 8 minor · Ask about this paper · The compiled record · Read the full review →

Challenge this review Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗

Cite ▾

arXiv IDhep-th/0605155 (version 2)

Pith IDVOUZUBGT, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review

CitationHeng-Yu Chen, Keisuke Okamura, Nick Dorey. "Dyonic Giant Magnons." arXiv:hep-th/0605155 (2006). https://pith.science/paper/VOUZUBGT

Cite this reviewBibTeX for Pith's review of this paper

Claim paper

Why Pith says this

Highlight any text to comment on it.

Editor's note

read the letter

This is the paper that fills in the two-charge case of the Hofman-Maldacena story, and it does so cleanly. If you work on the AdS/CFT integrability program, you already know it or should. The new object is the general giant magnon on R x S^3 carrying both J1 and J2, constructed explicitly (Eq 39) by lifting the complex sine-Gordon one-soliton through Pohlmeyer reduction. The single-charge case is HM; the p = pi two-charge case is a limit of the folded string in Dorey's earlier note. What is genuinely new here is the general solution for arbitrary p and J2, and the resulting dispersion relation (41), which reproduces the conjectured BPS formula (2) from a purely classical calculation. That match is a check against a target, not an input, so the logic is not circular. I went through the algebra: normalization, the charge integrals (40), and the elimination of k and alpha all hold. The stress-test note is right that there is no load-bearing objection here, and I agree with the reader's high confidence and the ACCEPT verdict. The one thing I would flag to a referee: the Virasoro constraint is asserted with 'one may easily check' rather than shown, and the uniqueness argument for the CsG one-soliton as the seed is heuristic. Neither is fatal, because the solution is verified explicitly afterward, but a short appendix would have cost the authors little and saved every reader the same twenty minutes. The HM-limit charge subtlety after Eq 8 is real but the authors flag it themselves, and it is the standard HM framework, so I would not treat it as a hidden assumption. The semiclassical quantization section (Bohr-Sommerfeld, dI = dJ2) is brief and reads as a sketch; it is a nice consistency observation rather than a derivation, and the paper does not oversell it. Citation pattern is appropriate: HM, Dorey, Frolov-Tseytlin, Pohlmeyer, and the CsG soliton literature are all correctly credited. This is a foundational contribution to the program, and it deserves a serious referee. I would cite it, and I would bring it to a reading group on the worldsheet S-matrix.

Referee report

Minor objections (8)

[Eqs. (24), (25), (27)] The potential term is printed as 1 − 2 cos²(α) cosh²(cos(α)X), but consistency with the Rosen-Morse potential V(ξ) = −2/cosh²(ξ) in Eq. (31) and with the bound-state wavefunction (32) requires sech², i.e. 1 − 2 cos²(α)/cosh²(cos(α)X). As printed the expression is unbounded and cannot reproduce (24); please correct the three occurrences.
[After Eq. (39)] The statement that the solution obeys the Virasoro constraints is asserted rather than demonstrated. Since |∂±X|² = 1 is a key consistency condition, a short explicit verification (or a line in an appendix) would improve reproducibility; I have checked it and it holds.
[After Eq. (12) and after Eq. (22)] The uniqueness claims (the unique solution with the required properties; the unique candidate for the dyonic giant magnon) are heuristic. The explicit verification makes them non-load-bearing, but the wording could be softened or a brief argument supplied.
[Paragraph after Eq. (8)] The authors correctly acknowledge that the HM-limit integrals (7,8) need not equal (4,5) because of contributions near σ = ±π. This is handled correctly, but a sentence making the identification with the second magnon at x = ∞ explicit, as is done for the momentum, would help the reader.
[Eq. (43) and following] The Bohr-Sommerfeld relation gives dI = dJ2, hence I = J2 + const; the additive constant is fixed implicitly by the requirement that the elementary magnon carry J2 = 1. A brief remark would clarify this.
[References] Reference [22] (Witten-Olive) appears in the bibliography but I could not locate a citation in the body; please check.
[Footnote 4] Footnote 4 refers to the footnote below Eq. (11); the cross-reference could be made explicit (footnote 2).
[Abstract and Eq. (41)] The word exact is used for the classical result; it would be worth stating explicitly that the classical computation reproduces the exact BPS formula (2) as a function of J2, and that the exactness of (2) at finite λ is a quantum BPS property rather than something established by the classical calculation.

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

The paper

The paper claims

A classical string spinning in two directions on a five-sphere reproduces, exactly, the dispersion relation that the spin-chain picture predicts for bound states of many magnons.

The reading

The paper asks whether a purely classical string calculation can reproduce the exact formula that the gauge-theory spin chain predicts for bound states of magnons. In the Hofman-Maldacena limit, where one R-charge $J_1$ and the energy $��$ both go to infinity with $�� - J_1$ fixed, the authors construct an explicit string solution on $R �� S^3$ that carries a second angular momentum $J_2$ as well. The construction runs through Pohlmeyer's reduction, which turns the string equations into the complex sine-Gordon equation; the single-soliton solution of that equation is then lifted back to an explicit string trajectory. Evaluating the conserved charges of that trajectory gives $�� - J_1 = ��(J_2^2 + (��/��)^2 ��^2(p/2))$, which is exactly the conjectured BPS dispersion relation for magnon bound states, with no approximation in $J_2$. If correct, this says that a relation believed to hold for all values of the coupling can be read off a weak-coupling-gravity classical computation, in the same way that the classical mass formula for BPS dyons turns out to be exact.

What carries the argument

Pohlmeyer's reduction is the load-bearing device. It packages the $SO(4)$-invariant data of the $R �� S^3$ string into a real field $��$ and a phase $��$, combined into $�� = ��(��/2) e^{i��/2}$, which obeys the complex sine-Gordon equation; the charges of that equation's solitons correspond to the string's second angular momentum. The one-soliton solution, $�� = e^{i��} ��(��) e^{i ��(��) T} / ��(��(��)X)$, with $X = ��(��)x - ��(��)t$, reduces the reconstruction problem to a linear Klein-Gordon equation in a $��2/��^2(��)$ potential. That potential is the Rosen-Morse well, whose single normalisable bound state supplies $Z_2$ and whose scattering states supply $Z_1$; the boundary conditions $Z_1 �� e^{it �� ip/2}$, $Z_2 �� 0$ at $x �� $ fix the momentum through $k = ��(��)/��(��)$.

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the exact dispersion relation for magnon bound states, $�� - J_1 = ��(J_2^2 + (��/��)^2 ��^2(p/2))$, follows from a classical string solution rather than from a weak-coupling approximation. The authors write down a two-parameter family of string motions on $R �� S^3$ labelled by a rapidity $��$ and a rotation parameter $��$, obtain it by reconstructing the worldsheet fields from the one-soliton solution of the complex sine-Gordon equation, and check it against the string equation of motion, the Virasoro constraints, and the consistency condition fixing $��X �� X$. Computing the two conserved charges in the rescaled Hofman-Maldacena coordinates yields $�� - J_1 = (��/��) (1+k^2)^{-1} ��(1+k^2 ��^2 ��)/��$ and $J_2 = (��/��) (1+k^2)^{-1} ��$, with magnon momentum $p = 2��^{-1}(1/k)$; eliminating $k$ and $��$ gives the BPS formula. The original single-charge Giant Magnon appears as the $�� = 0$ special case, and the $p = ��$ configuration reproduces half of the folded two-spin string already known.

Load-bearing premise

The derivation assumes that the charge integrals computed in the rescaled Hofman-Maldacena coordinates, with the string treated as open and the boundary pushed to $x = ��$, equal the physical charges of the magnon bound state, even though the paper itself notes just below Eq. (8) that these need not agree with the original closed-string charges because of contributions near $�� = ��$.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Every integer value of $J_2$ corresponds to a classical string configuration, so the tower of magnon bound states has a direct geometric realisation as strings with two angular momenta on $S^3$.
The $p = ��$ member of the family reproduces the known half of the folded two-spin string, so the earlier folded-string result and the single-charge Giant Magnon become two ends of one continuous family.
Semiclassical quantisation of the periodic motion, with period $T = 2�� (��)/��(��)$, gives the Bohr-Sommerfeld action variable $I = J_2$, so the quantum theory restricts $J_2$ to integers automatically.
Because the dispersion relation is derived without expanding in $J_2$, it holds for $J_2 \sim \sqrt{��}$, the regime where a classical string description of the second charge makes sense.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The resemblance the authors draw to BPS dyons suggests a sharper question than the paper poses: is there a protected-charge argument that explains why the classical formula receives no string-loop corrections, or is the agreement at this order a coincidence of the large-$J_1$ limit?
The multi-soliton solutions of the complex sine-Gordon equation are already known and scatter with a computable time delay, so the same machinery should give the semiclassical two-magnon S-matrix and its phase, which would be a direct check against the exact spin-chain S-matrix.
If the Hofman-Maldacena charge integrals differ from the true closed-string charges by boundary terms, the discrepancy should scale with how the second magnon is placed at $x = \pm��$; comparing the two normalisations on a finite closed string would test whether the match survives.
The same reduction applied to strings on $R �� S^5$ rather than $R �� S^3$ would probe whether three or more independent angular momenta admit an equally exact dispersion relation, or whether exactness is special to two charges.

Original abstract

We study the classical spectrum of string theory on AdS_5 X S^5 in the Hofman-Maldacena limit. We find a family of classical solutions corresponding to Giant Magnons with two independent angular momenta on S^5. These solutions are related via Pohlmeyer's reduction procedure to the charged solitons of the Complex sine-Gordon equation. The corresponding string states are dual to BPS boundstates of many magnons in the spin-chain description of planar N=4 SUSY Yang-Mills. The exact dispersion relation for these states is obtained from a purely classical calculation in string theory.

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged, kept beside the review and separate from it. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,182 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.08 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.01 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.17 · compares with prior results 0.13 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; show every role.

We study the classical spectrum of string theory on AdS_5 X S^5 in the Hofman-Maldacena limit. We find a family of classical solutions corresponding to Giant Magnons with two independent angular momenta on S^5. These solutions are related via Pohlmeyer's reduction procedure to the charged solitons of the Complex sine-Gordon equation. The corresponding string states are dual to BPS boundstates of many magnons in the spin-chain description of planar N=4 SUSY Yang-Mills. The exact dispersion relation for these states is obtained from a purely classical calculation in string theory.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#	sentence	role	the authors' own work	states the main conclusion	strength
s0	We study the classical spectrum of string theory on AdS_5 X S^5 in the Hofman-Maldacena limit.	contribution 0.68	0.85	0.04	asserted 0.82
s1	We find a family of classical solutions corresponding to Giant Magnons with two independent angular momenta on S^5.	result 0.89	0.96	0.28	asserted 1.00
s2	These solutions are related via Pohlmeyer's reduction procedure to the charged solitons of the Complex sine-Gordon equation.	result 0.51	0.61	0.11	asserted 1.00
s3	The corresponding string states are dual to BPS boundstates of many magnons in the spin-chain description of planar N=4 SUSY Yang-Mills.	interpretation 0.89	0.47	0.27	asserted 1.00
s4	The exact dispersion relation for these states is obtained from a purely classical calculation in string theory.	result 0.99	0.94	0.52	asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read

arXiv listing abstract v2

not examined

full text
figures and tables
references and citing sentences
relations to other papers

levels run

P abstract

not run

S sections
T body sentences
C citations
R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

Figures

**Figure 1.** A Giant Magnon solution. The endpoints of the string move on the equator θ = π/2 at the speed of light. The magnon momentum is given by p = ∆ϕ, where ∆ϕ is the angular distance between two endpoints of the string. string2 with both endpoints moving on the equator θ = π/2 at the speed of light. The string theory quantity corresponding to the magnon momentum p is exactly given by the angular separation ∆ϕ between these two endpoints of the string (see

Figures reproduced from arXiv:hep-th/0605155 by the authors.

References

Works cited (25)

[14]

N. Dorey, “Magnon bound states and the AdS/CFT correspon dence,” arXiv:hep- th/0604175

View on Pith
[1]

J. A. Minahan and K. Zarembo, “The Bethe-ansatz for N = 4 supe r Yang-Mills,” JHEP 0303 (2003) 013 [arXiv:hep-th/0212208]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2003
[2]

N. Beisert and M. Staudacher, “The N = 4 SYM integrable super sp in chain,” Nucl. Phys. B 670 (2003) 439 [arXiv:hep-th/0307042]. N. Beisert, C. Kristjansen and M. Staudacher, “The dilatation ope rator of N = 4 super Yang-Mills theory,” Nucl. Phys. B 664 (2003) 131 [arXiv:hep-th/0303060]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2003
[3]

G. Mandal, N. V. Suryanarayana and S. R. Wadia, “Aspects of se miclassical strings in AdS(5),” Phys. Lett. B 543, 81 (2002) [arXiv:hep-th/0206103]. I. Bena, J. Polchinski and R. Roiban, “Hidden symmetries of the AdS (5) x S**5 superstring,” Phys. Rev. D 69, 046002 (2004) [arXiv:hep-th/0305116]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2002
[4]

N. Beisert, V. Dippel and M. Staudacher, “A novel long range sp in chain and planar N = 4 super Yang-Mills,” JHEP 0407 (2004) 075 [arXiv:hep-th/0405001]. 12

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2004
[5]

G. Arutyunov, S. Frolov and M. Staudacher, “Bethe ansatz fo r quantum strings,” JHEP 0410 (2004) 016 [arXiv:hep-th/0406256]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2004
[6]

M. Staudacher, “The factorized S-matrix of CFT/AdS,” JHEP 0505, 054 (2005) [arXiv:hep-th/0412188]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2005
[7]

N. Beisert and M. Staudacher, “Long-range PSU(2,2 |4) Bethe ansaetze for gauge theory and strings,” Nucl. Phys. B 727 (2005) 1 [arXiv:hep-th/0504190]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2005
[8]

N. Beisert, “The su(2 |2) dynamic S-matrix,” arXiv:hep-th/0511082

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[9]

D. M. Hofman and J. M. Maldacena, “Giant magnons,” arXiv:hep-th /0604135

View on Pith
[10]

N. Mann and J. Polchinski, “Bethe ansatz for a quantum superc oset sigma model,” Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005) 086002 [arXiv:hep-th/0508232]. J. Ambjorn, R. A. Janik and C. Kristjansen, “Wrapping interaction s and a new source of corrections to the spin-chain / string duality,” Nucl. Phys . B 736, 288 (2006) [arXiv:hep-th/0510171]. R. A. Janik, “The AdS(5) x S**...

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2005
[11]

A. Santambrogio and D. Zanon, “Exact anomalous dimensions of N = 4 Yang- Mills operators with large R charge,” Phys. Lett. B 545 (2002) 425 [arXiv:hep- th/0206079]. D. Berenstein, D. H. Correa and S. E. Vazquez, “All loop BMN state energies from matrices,” JHEP 0602 (2006) 048 [arXiv:hep-th/0509015]. 13

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2002
[12]

K. Pohlmeyer, “Integrable Hamiltonian Systems And Interactio ns Through Quadratic Constraints,” Commun. Math. Phys. 46 (1976) 207

View on Pith 1976
[13]

A. Mikhailov, “An action variable of the sine-Gordon model,” arXiv:h ep- th/0504035. A. Mikhailov, “A nonlocal Poisson bracket of the sine-Gordon model,” arXiv:hep- th/0511069

View on Pith
[15]

S. Frolov and A. A. Tseytlin, “Rotating string solutions: AdS/CF T dual- ity in non-supersymmetric sectors,” Phys. Lett. B 570 (2003) 96 [arXiv:hep- th/0306143]

View on Pith 2003
[16]

G. Arutyunov, S. Frolov, J. Russo and A. A. Tseytlin, “Spinning strings in AdS(5) x S**5 and integrable systems,” Nucl. Phys. B 671 (2003) 3 [arXiv:hep- th/0307191]

View on Pith 2003
[17]

F. Lund and T. Regge, “Uniﬁed Approach To Strings And Vortice s With Soliton Solutions,” Phys. Rev. D 14 (1976) 1524. F. Lund, “Example Of A Relativistic, Completely Integrable, Hamiltonia n Sys- tem,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 38 (1977) 1175. B. S. Getmanov, “Integrable Model For The Nonlinear Complex Scala r Field With The Nontrivial Asymptotics Of N - Soliton S...

View on Pith 1976
[18]

N. Dorey and T. J. Hollowood, “Quantum scattering of charged solitons in the complex sine-Gordon model,” Nucl. Phys. B 440 (1995) 215 [arXiv:hep- th/9410140]

View on Pith 1995
[19]

P. Bowcock and G. Tzamtzis, “The complex sine-Gordon model o n a half line,” arXiv:hep-th/0203139

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[20]

B. Julia and A. Zee, “Poles With Both Magnetic And Electric Charge s In Non- abelian Gauge Theory,” Phys. Rev. D 11, 2227 (1975)

View on Pith 1975
[21]

E. Tomboulis and G. Woo, “Semiclassical Quantization For Gauge T heories,” MIT-CTP-540

View on Pith
[22]

E. Witten and D. I. Olive, “Supersymmetry Algebras That Includ e Topological Charges,” Phys. Lett. B 78 (1978) 97

View on Pith 1978
[23]

N. Rosen and P. Morse, Phys. Rev. 42 (1932) 210

View on Pith 1932
[24]

L. D. Landau, E. M. Lifshitz, “Quantum Mechanics (Non-Relativ istic Theory)” (Pergamon), p.73 Problem 5 and p.80 Problem 4

View on Pith
[25]

N. Dorey and B. Vicedo, “On the dynamics of ﬁnite-gap solutions in classical string theory,” arXiv:hep-th/0601194. 15

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

Forward citations

Cited by 14 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Pohlmeyer reduction of AdS_5 x S^5 superstring sigma model
hep-th 2007-11 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

The authors derive a 2d Lorentz-invariant reduced Lagrangian for the AdS5 x S5 superstring and prove that in the AdS2 x S2 case it equals the N=2 supersymmetric sine-Gordon model.
Finite-gap equations for strings on AdS_3 x S^3 x T^4 with mixed 3-form flux
hep-th 2014-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

The authors construct finite-gap equations for strings on AdS3 x S3 x T4 with mixed RR/NSNS flux and show they match the thermodynamic limit of a conjectured all-loop Bethe ansatz.
Giant magnon solution and dispersion relation in string theory in AdS_3 x S^3 x T^4 with mixed flux
hep-th 2013-11 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

The exact dispersion relation for light-cone string excitations in AdS3 x S3 x T4 with mixed flux has a central charge linear in worldsheet momentum, fixed by an explicit dyonic giant magnon solution.
Dressing phases of AdS3/CFT2
hep-th 2013-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

The two all-loop dressing phases of the AdS3 x S3 x T4 integrable S-matrix are determined by solving the crossing relations, yielding a BES-like phase plus a new term absent in the higher-dimensional cases.
Notes on supersymmetric Wilson loops on a two-sphere
hep-th 2009-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

The regularized area of pseudo-holomorphic string surfaces dual to 1/8-BPS Wilson loops on S2 is invariant under area-preserving deformations of the boundary loop, and the connected two-loop correlator matches a Gauss...

Show 9 more citing papers

Pohlmeyer reduction revisited
hep-th 2008-08 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

Pohlmeyer reduction of sigma models on symmetric spaces F/G is reformulated group-theoretically, and the gauged-WZW Lagrangian formulation is extended to cases where the two centraliser subgroups are isomorphic but distinct.
On the Singularities of the Magnon S-matrix
hep-th 2007-03 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

The double poles in the magnon S-matrix are pair-exchange singularities of BPS magnons, located where the BES conjecture puts them, and the non-BPS breather is just two BPS magnons.
Spiky strings and giant magnons on S5
hep-th 2006-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

A generalized Neumann-Rosochatius ansatz in conformal gauge accommodates spiky strings and giant magnons on S5, yielding a three-spin giant magnon interpreted as two equal-velocity magnons and matched to a two-bound-s...
Dressing the Giant Magnon
hep-th 2006-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

The dressing method yields explicit classical string solutions for scattering and bound states of one-, two-, and three-charge giant magnons on R x S^5, together with their dispersion relations.
Generating AdS String Solutions
hep-th 2007-12 accept novelty 5.0 of 10

A Pohlmeyer reduction plus inverse scattering turns sinh-Gordon solitons, antisolitons, and breathers into explicit classical string solutions in AdS3.
Single spike solutions for strings on S2 and S3
hep-th 2007-05 accept novelty 5.0 of 10

A new classical string solution on S² and S³, the single spike, has energy and angular momentum related by Δ = (√λ/π)(θ̄ - sin θ̄), generalizing to J₁ = √(J₂² + (λ/π²) sin² θ̄) when a second angular momentum is added.
Non-relativistic Strings: Classical solutions and exactly solvable models
hep-th 2025-04 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

Non-relativistic strings on R x S2 admit spinning and pulsating solutions whose leading and next-to-leading order dynamics are cast as Neumann-Rosochatius-like solvable models with Bohr-Sommerfeld energy spectra.
Towards integrability for AdS3/CFT2
hep-th 2014-06 accept novelty 3.0 of 10

A self-contained review that assembles, from previously published work, the symmetry-fixed all-loop S matrix and Bethe ansatz for massive AdS3 x S3 x T4 string excitations, including a crossing-symmetric proposal for ...
Review of AdS/CFT Integrability, Chapter IV.3: N=6 Chern-Simons and Strings on AdS4xCP3
hep-th 2010-12 accept novelty 1.0 of 10

The chapter consolidates how planar ABJM theory and IIA strings on AdS4xCP3 both reduce to an alternating OSp(6|4) spin chain, and catalogues where the Bethe equations, S-matrix and algebraic curve differ from the AdS5 case.

How later papers used it

61 later papers cite it

Evidence: substantial. 56 of the citing papers share no author with it, and 12 of those carry a confident label from Pith's citation classifier.

Pith read 21 of the 109 citing sentences, choosing only those whose citation markers point at this paper alone, and wrote the paraphrases from them. The summary, the counts, the evidence level, the links and the quotes come from code; the summary counts the papers listed below. A later paper is listed under a label when Pith's citation classifier gives one of its sentences that label at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), Pith's reading finds that the citing paper itself did it, and a second check confirms the paraphrase against the sentence. This section lists uses only. It does not list criticism or disagreement, so their absence here says nothing about how the paper has been received. Papers that share an author with this one are listed apart, under "By the same authors". A quote is the citing authors' own sentence, shown when their paper's licence is CC BY, CC BY-SA or CC0. JSON

1 later paper by other authors is listed below: 1 built on it.

Builds on it 1 of 5 papers with this label

Generalised the relation between the complex sine-Gordon soliton and the q=0 dyonic giant magnon used in this paper.

Giant magnon solution and dispersion relation in string theory in AdS_3 x S^3 x T^4 with mixed flux (2013) · 0.99 · paraphrased: the licence does not allow quoting

How the literature uses it

58 arXiv papers cite this in 103 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 71 sentences without a confident label

Builds on it 4 papers

In section [ref] we will construct the dyonic giant magnon solution generalising the solution of [ref] to the $q≠0$ case.

Giant magnon solution and dispersion relation in string theory in AdS_3 x S^3 x T^4 with mixed flux · Introduction · 1.00
It is equally easy to place Dorey's $S^3$ dyonic giant magnon [ref] into $RP^3$, giving a two-spin generalisation of the $RP^2$ magnon [ref] .

Dyonic Giant Magnons in CP^3: Strings and Curves at Finite J · Introduction · 0.80
This correspondence is generalized to the one between magnon boundstates and dyonic giant magnons in $ℝ_t ×S^3$ [ref] .

Scattering of Giant Magnons in CP^3 · Introduction · 0.85

Uses its method or tool 1 paper

The dressing method [ref] (or the Bäcklund transformation [ref] ) can be used to construct classical solutions [ref] describing arbitrary scattering and bound states (both BPS [ref] and non-BPS [ref] ) of magnons.

Semiclassical Quantization of the Giant Magnon · Introduction · 0.85

Compares with it 7 papers

The energy-spin relation for our solution is shown to precisely agree with the dispersion relation for the SYM magnon boundstates [ref] .

Aspects of Integrability in AdS/CFT Duality · Outline of the thesis · 0.99
For the bulk scattering, the two results were in complete agreement [ref] .

Reflecting Magnon Bound States · Strong Coupling Limit · 0.93
From [ref]), one finds $f_2=0$ and f_1=arctan[α/β√(1-β^2/α^2) tanh(ω_1σ+τβ/α/√(1-β^2/α^2))].For $R^2=M^2=ω_1^2=1$, $β/α=-sinθ_0$, this string solution coincides with the Hofman-Maldacena solution [ref] , and is equivalent to the solution in [ref] for $R_t×S^2$ after the identification $W_1=Z_1exp(iπ/2)$, $W_2=Z_2$.

Finite-size Effects for Single Spike · The Giant Magnon · 0.96

Cites it as support 1 paper

Indeed, as discussed in [ref] , the representatives of the boundstate multiplets lying in a given $SU(2)$ sector are directly visible both in one-loop gauge theory and in semiclassical string theory which correspond to small and large $λ$ respectively.

Aspects of Integrability in AdS/CFT Duality · The asymptotic spectrum · 0.97

Cites it as background 15 papers

The sigma model has soliton solutions which, in their most general form, are known as dyonic giant magnons [ref] .

The Semi-Classical Spectrum of Solitons and Giant Magnons · Introduction · 0.81
Here we sketch how the original works [ref] are distributed along the thesis.

Aspects of Integrability in AdS/CFT Duality · Outline of the thesis · 0.90
As discussed in the previous section, the Dyonic Giant Magnon (DGM) is a soliton on the string worldsheet [ref] .

Quantum Scattering of Giant Magnons · Phase Shifts from the Dressing Method · 0.81

Discussion

Disagree with the review, or know something it missed? Leave a comment, highlight any passage above to comment on it, or challenge this review formally.

[1] [14]

N. Dorey, “Magnon bound states and the AdS/CFT correspon dence,” arXiv:hep- th/0604175

View on Pith

[2] [1]

J. A. Minahan and K. Zarembo, “The Bethe-ansatz for N = 4 supe r Yang-Mills,” JHEP 0303 (2003) 013 [arXiv:hep-th/0212208]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2003

[3] [2]

N. Beisert and M. Staudacher, “The N = 4 SYM integrable super sp in chain,” Nucl. Phys. B 670 (2003) 439 [arXiv:hep-th/0307042]. N. Beisert, C. Kristjansen and M. Staudacher, “The dilatation ope rator of N = 4 super Yang-Mills theory,” Nucl. Phys. B 664 (2003) 131 [arXiv:hep-th/0303060]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2003

[4] [3]

G. Mandal, N. V. Suryanarayana and S. R. Wadia, “Aspects of se miclassical strings in AdS(5),” Phys. Lett. B 543, 81 (2002) [arXiv:hep-th/0206103]. I. Bena, J. Polchinski and R. Roiban, “Hidden symmetries of the AdS (5) x S**5 superstring,” Phys. Rev. D 69, 046002 (2004) [arXiv:hep-th/0305116]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2002

[5] [4]

N. Beisert, V. Dippel and M. Staudacher, “A novel long range sp in chain and planar N = 4 super Yang-Mills,” JHEP 0407 (2004) 075 [arXiv:hep-th/0405001]. 12

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2004

[6] [5]

G. Arutyunov, S. Frolov and M. Staudacher, “Bethe ansatz fo r quantum strings,” JHEP 0410 (2004) 016 [arXiv:hep-th/0406256]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2004

[7] [6]

M. Staudacher, “The factorized S-matrix of CFT/AdS,” JHEP 0505, 054 (2005) [arXiv:hep-th/0412188]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2005

[8] [7]

N. Beisert and M. Staudacher, “Long-range PSU(2,2 |4) Bethe ansaetze for gauge theory and strings,” Nucl. Phys. B 727 (2005) 1 [arXiv:hep-th/0504190]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2005

[9] [8]

N. Beisert, “The su(2 |2) dynamic S-matrix,” arXiv:hep-th/0511082

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[10] [9]

D. M. Hofman and J. M. Maldacena, “Giant magnons,” arXiv:hep-th /0604135

View on Pith

[11] [10]

N. Mann and J. Polchinski, “Bethe ansatz for a quantum superc oset sigma model,” Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005) 086002 [arXiv:hep-th/0508232]. J. Ambjorn, R. A. Janik and C. Kristjansen, “Wrapping interaction s and a new source of corrections to the spin-chain / string duality,” Nucl. Phys . B 736, 288 (2006) [arXiv:hep-th/0510171]. R. A. Janik, “The AdS(5) x S**...

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2005

[12] [11]

A. Santambrogio and D. Zanon, “Exact anomalous dimensions of N = 4 Yang- Mills operators with large R charge,” Phys. Lett. B 545 (2002) 425 [arXiv:hep- th/0206079]. D. Berenstein, D. H. Correa and S. E. Vazquez, “All loop BMN state energies from matrices,” JHEP 0602 (2006) 048 [arXiv:hep-th/0509015]. 13

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2002

[13] [12]

K. Pohlmeyer, “Integrable Hamiltonian Systems And Interactio ns Through Quadratic Constraints,” Commun. Math. Phys. 46 (1976) 207

View on Pith 1976

[14] [13]

A. Mikhailov, “An action variable of the sine-Gordon model,” arXiv:h ep- th/0504035. A. Mikhailov, “A nonlocal Poisson bracket of the sine-Gordon model,” arXiv:hep- th/0511069

View on Pith

[15] [15]

S. Frolov and A. A. Tseytlin, “Rotating string solutions: AdS/CF T dual- ity in non-supersymmetric sectors,” Phys. Lett. B 570 (2003) 96 [arXiv:hep- th/0306143]

View on Pith 2003

[16] [16]

G. Arutyunov, S. Frolov, J. Russo and A. A. Tseytlin, “Spinning strings in AdS(5) x S**5 and integrable systems,” Nucl. Phys. B 671 (2003) 3 [arXiv:hep- th/0307191]

View on Pith 2003

[17] [17]

F. Lund and T. Regge, “Uniﬁed Approach To Strings And Vortice s With Soliton Solutions,” Phys. Rev. D 14 (1976) 1524. F. Lund, “Example Of A Relativistic, Completely Integrable, Hamiltonia n Sys- tem,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 38 (1977) 1175. B. S. Getmanov, “Integrable Model For The Nonlinear Complex Scala r Field With The Nontrivial Asymptotics Of N - Soliton S...

View on Pith 1976

[18] [18]

N. Dorey and T. J. Hollowood, “Quantum scattering of charged solitons in the complex sine-Gordon model,” Nucl. Phys. B 440 (1995) 215 [arXiv:hep- th/9410140]

View on Pith 1995

[19] [19]

P. Bowcock and G. Tzamtzis, “The complex sine-Gordon model o n a half line,” arXiv:hep-th/0203139

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[20] [20]

B. Julia and A. Zee, “Poles With Both Magnetic And Electric Charge s In Non- abelian Gauge Theory,” Phys. Rev. D 11, 2227 (1975)

View on Pith 1975

[21] [21]

E. Tomboulis and G. Woo, “Semiclassical Quantization For Gauge T heories,” MIT-CTP-540

View on Pith

[22] [22]

E. Witten and D. I. Olive, “Supersymmetry Algebras That Includ e Topological Charges,” Phys. Lett. B 78 (1978) 97

View on Pith 1978

[23] [23]

N. Rosen and P. Morse, Phys. Rev. 42 (1932) 210

View on Pith 1932

[24] [24]

L. D. Landau, E. M. Lifshitz, “Quantum Mechanics (Non-Relativ istic Theory)” (Pergamon), p.73 Problem 5 and p.80 Problem 4

View on Pith

[25] [25]

N. Dorey and B. Vicedo, “On the dynamics of ﬁnite-gap solutions in classical string theory,” arXiv:hep-th/0601194. 15

View on Pith Pith review arXiv