Chiral Dynamics of Baryons from String Theory

Deog Ki Hong; Ho-Ung Yee; Mannque Rho; Piljin Yi

REVIEW

Chiral Dynamics of Baryons from String Theory

Deog Ki Hong, Mannque Rho, Ho-Ung Yee, Piljin Yi

High Energy Physics - Theory · Submitted 30 Jan 2007 · 15 references

Pith's verdict: The structural claim — g_A and the magnetic moment both scale as N_c with no λ or MKK dependence — is the part worth citing; the numerical agreement with experiment rests on a shift the authors themselves call an assumption.

T0 · AI review

How this review was made: An AI referee (selfhosted/deepseek-v4.1-flash) read the paper on November 11, 2026 and answered a fixed list of questions about it. T0 is the starting level every paper gets. The levels describe how deeply Pith has checked the paper, never the authors.

T0 AI review An AI read the paper and answered a fixed list of questions.
T1 Audit Automatic checks that the references and files the paper relies on exist and match.
T2 Compute The paper's code or calculations re-run with the same results.
T3 Formal statement The claims written out in a formal math language a computer can read.
T4 Proof Those claims proved, and the proof checked by computer.

How Pith checks papers →

· 3 major objections · 8 minor · Ask about this paper · The compiled record · Read the full review →

Challenge this review Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗

Cite ▾

arXiv IDhep-th/0701276 (version 2)

Pith IDFJCVI2HF, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review

CitationDeog Ki Hong, Ho-Ung Yee, Mannque Rho, Piljin Yi. "Chiral Dynamics of Baryons from String Theory." arXiv:hep-th/0701276 (2007). https://pith.science/paper/FJCVI2HF

Cite this reviewBibTeX for Pith's review of this paper

Claim paper

Why Pith says this

Highlight any text to comment on it.

Editor's note

read the letter

The real content here is one idea and one number. The idea: in Sakai-Sugimoto the baryon is a small instanton with string hairs, and that identification forces a specific 5D magnetic coupling between the baryon bilinear and F_mn (their Eq. 10). Fixing its coefficient by matching the bilinear to the instanton's own long-range tail gives g5(0) = 2π²/3, and dimensional reduction then yields g_A and Δμ_an both proportional to N_c, with no λ or MKK dependence. That λ-independence is the part I would bet on. It is a clean structural statement and it is why people cite this paper. Credit where due: the setup is economical, the KK mode expansion is done properly, and the authors are upfront that the N_c → N_c+2 substitution is imported from Skyrme and constituent-quark work [13], not derived. They also flag the overlap with Hata et al. in the note added. Soft spots, in order of how much they matter. First, the small-instanton expansion is not small at the parameters they use. Eq. 7 assumes ρMKK ≪ 1; with their own quoted λN_c ≈ 26 and N_c = 3 you get ρMKK ≈ 3.3. So the 4/π overlap estimate in Eq. 24 is being used well outside its stated regime, and the claim that the baryon is 'significantly smaller than the relevant scale' only holds for λ in the hundreds. Second, g5(0) and the collective-coordinate average in Eq. 16 are sketched in a single paragraph and deferred to [9], listed as in preparation. That is the load-bearing normalization for both headline numbers and it is not checkable from this letter. Third, the numerical agreement (1.32 vs 1.26, 3.6 vs 3.7) is pleasant but it is two numbers with one adjustable shift; I would not weight it heavily in either direction. On the reader's circularity worry, I think it is overstated. Matching a soliton's long-range field to its source is how you fix the coupling, not a fit to data; the Skyrme model does the same thing. Who should read it: anyone in holographic QCD or working on baryons from gauge/gravity. It is a four-page letter with the details in a longer paper, which is the usual arrangement and not a fault. Send it to referees.

Referee report

Significance

If the structural result holds, it is a genuinely useful contribution: it identifies, within a specific and well-motivated holographic model, a single five-dimensional magnetic operator that controls both the axial coupling and the magnetic moments, and it makes the parameter-free prediction that both scale as N_c with no λ or M_KK dependence at leading order. That is a falsifiable statement about the N_c scaling of baryon chiral observables, and it connects the instanton picture of the baryon to the hidden-local-symmetry treatment of vector mesons in a way that had not been made explicit. The paper is also commendably transparent about the crudeness of the numerical comparison and includes a Note Added disclosing partial overlap with a contemporaneous paper. The strengths are the structural prediction and the explicit confrontation with experiment; the weakness is that the numerical agreement, which is the paper's rhetorical centrepiece, rests on inputs that are either estimated or outside the regime in which they were derived.

Major objections (3)

[Five-dimensional effective action of baryons, Eqs. (15)–(17)] The normalization g5(0) = 2π²/3 is the single quantity that sets the scale of both headline numbers, since g_A and Δμ_an are both proportional to g5(0)ρ²_baryon/e²(0) (Eq. 23). The derivation given here is one paragraph: the collective-coordinate average in Eq. (16) is asserted to follow from reasoning 'mathematically identical' to Adkins–Nappi–Witten, and the reader is referred to Ref. [9], listed as 'in preparation', for the implementation. Because the 1/3 factor and the source normalization in Eq. (13) propagate linearly into g_A and Δμ_an, the paper should either present the matching explicitly — the collective-coordinate measure, the regularization of the source, and the step from Eq. (15) to Eq. (16) — or state clearly in the text that the coefficient is contingent on Ref. [9]. As it stands a reader cannot check the central normalization from the letter alone.
[Baryons as small and hairy instantons, Eqs. (7)–(8); Discussions] The estimate of the five-dimensional Coulomb energy in Eq. (7) is explicitly conditioned on ρM_KK ≪ 1, and the localization argument that reduces Eq. (22) to the closed form of Eq. (24) likewise assumes f_L,R is sharply peaked at w = 0. But Eq. (8) gives ρ_baryon M_KK ≈ 9.6/√λ, which at the phenomenological value λN_c ≈ 26 quoted in the Discussions (λ ≈ 8.7) is ≈ 3.3, not small. The paper does not acknowledge this tension. Since the 4/π factor in Eq. (24) is an estimate of the overlap integral ∫dw |f_L|² ∂_w ψ_0 M_KK under exactly the localization assumption that fails at these parameters, the reader needs a statement of how the numbers in the Discussions shift when the expansion parameter is not small, or at minimum an explicit caveat that the numerical comparison is being made outside the regime of validity of Eqs. (7) and (24).
[Discussions, paragraph beginning 'So far, all the computations...'] The numerical agreement with experiment is presented as the paper's closing evidence, but it depends entirely on the replacement N_c → N_c+2, which the authors themselves describe as unverified ('we are ill-equipped to verify the above shift directly, let us assume...'). Without the shift, Eq. (24) plus the quoted g_A^min ≈ 0.15 gives g_A ≈ 0.85 rather than 1.32, and Eq. (27) gives Δμ_an/μ_B ≈ 2.2 rather than 3.6, against experimental values of 1.26 and 3.7. The authors are to be credited for flagging the assumption, but the sentence 'the chiral lagrangian ... is found to describe baryons remarkably well' should be qualified by quoting the unshifted values alongside the shifted ones, so that the reader can see how much of the agreement is carried by the N_c+2 prescription rather than by the holographic dynamics.

Minor objections (8)

[Abstract, sentence 2] The abstract states that dimensional reduction 'reproduces the usual chiral effective action'. What the letter actually demonstrates is the reduction of the baryon sector to a four-dimensional Lagrangian with the correct coupling structure and two estimated observables; the full matching to the chiral effective action, including the mesonic sector and its low-energy constants, is not shown here. Consider softening to 'reproduces the expected structure of the chiral effective action for baryons'.
[Abstract, sentence 2, and Eq. (24)] The abstract says g_A and the magnetic moments are 'proportional to N_c', but the numbers quoted in the Discussions use N_c+2. It would help to say in the abstract that the leading-order scaling is N_c and that the finite-N_c comparison uses a shifted counting.
[Eq. (24)] The factor 4/π is described as an approximation to the overlap integral for 'sufficiently localized' f_L,R. Please state what profile for f_L was used to obtain 4/π and how the result varies for a more realistic profile; even a one-line indication of the sensitivity would let the reader judge the quoted 0.7.
[Eqs. (6)–(7)] The coefficients in the electric coupling and in the Coulomb energy estimate, including the 1/20π² in Eq. (7) and the 1/6 in the mass correction, are quoted without intermediate steps and attributed to Ref. [9]. Since these enter the size estimate of Eq. (8), a short appendix or a few lines of derivation in the letter would make the paper self-contained.
[Eqs. (11)–(12)] The sign conventions in the on-shell spinor of Eq. (11) and in the decomposition of Eq. (12) are not fully specified; in particular the meaning of the two signs in Eq. (11) relative to the ± in Eq. (12) and to the choice U_{αA} = (i/2)ε_{αA} deserves one clarifying sentence.
[Discussions, 'independent of the 't Hooft coupling λ and the KK mass M_KK'] This λ-independence is an asymptotic statement, valid only when f_L,R is sharply localized, which is precisely what the large-λ limit is meant to guarantee. Please add the qualifier 'at leading order in 1/λ' so the claim is not read as exact.
[References [9] and [11]] Both Ref. [9] ('in preparation') and Ref. [11] ('to appear') are unpublished, and Ref. [9] carries the derivations on which the central normalization and the size estimate rest. Where possible, replace these with published versions or arXiv identifiers at the revision stage.
[Note Added] The disclosure of partial overlap with Ref. [14] is good practice and is appreciated. It would strengthen the letter to state explicitly which result overlaps (the instanton size estimate) and whether the two estimates agree numerically.

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

The paper

The paper claims

Treating baryons as instantons in the Sakai-Sugimoto holographic QCD model yields a five-dimensional magnetic coupling that reproduces the axial coupling g_A and magnetic moments as quantities proportional to Nc.

The reading

The Sakai-Sugimoto model is a string-theory construction that mimics some features of QCD, the theory of quarks and gluons. In it, quarks live on the ends of strings attached to a stack of D-branes, and the pion and the tower of vector mesons appear as vibrations of a separate set of D-branes (the D8 branes) that extend into a fifth dimension. A baryon, in this picture, is a small instanton: a localized lump of gauge field on the D8 branes, carrying a number of fundamental strings that give it electric charge. This paper asks what happens when you treat that instanton as a quantum particle. The authors write down a five-dimensional effective action for a baryon field, including a magnetic coupling whose strength is fixed by requiring that the baryon's own field reproduces the long-range tail of the instanton. They then reduce to four dimensions, where the baryon becomes an ordinary Dirac field coupled to pions and the infinite tower of vector mesons. The axial coupling g_A and the anomalous magnetic moment come out proportional to the number of colors Nc, with coefficients that do not depend on the string coupling or the Kaluza-Klein scale. To compare with real protons and neutrons, the authors replace Nc by Nc+2, a substitution borrowed from Skyrme-model and constituent-quark work, and plug in parameters fitted to the meson sector. They get g_A around 1.32 and a magnetic moment around 3.6 Bohr magnetons, close to the measured 1.26 and 3.7. The agreement is striking, but it depends on the hand-added Nc+2 shift and on approximations that are not fully quantified.

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The instanton interpretation of the baryon in the Sakai-Sugimoto model implies a specific five-dimensional magnetic coupling (Eq. 10) with g5(0) = 2 pi^2 / 3, fixed by matching the baryon bilinear to the instanton's long-range field. Dimensional reduction then gives g_A approximately 0.7 (Nc/3) and the anomalous magnetic moment approximately 0.36 Nc / MKK, both proportional to Nc and independent of the 't Hooft coupling lambda and the Kaluza-Klein scale MKK.

Load-bearing premise

The coefficient g5(0) = 2 pi^2 / 3 is fixed by a matching argument that the paper says is 'mathematically identical' to the Adkins-Nappi-Witten treatment of the Skyrme model, but the step from the collective-coordinate expectation value to the numerical coefficient is sketched in one paragraph (Five-dimensional effective action of baryons). If this normalization is off, every coupling estimate in the paper scales with it.

Original abstract

We study baryons in an AdS/CFT model of QCD by Sakai and Sugimoto, realized as small instantons with fundamental string hairs. We introduce an effective field theory of the baryons in the five-dimensional setting, and show that the instanton interpretation implies a particular magnetic coupling. Dimensional reduction to four dimensions reproduces the usual chiral effective action, and in particular we estimate the axial coupling $g_A$ between baryons and pions and the magnetic dipole moments, both of which are proportional to $N_c$. We extrapolate to finite $N_c$ and discuss subleading corrections.

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged, kept beside the review and separate from it. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 3,622 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.43 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.02 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.15 · compares with prior results 0.19 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; show every role.

We study baryons in an AdS/CFT model of QCD by Sakai and Sugimoto, realized as small instantons with fundamental string hairs. We introduce an effective field theory of the baryons in the five-dimensional setting, and show that the instanton interpretation implies a particular magnetic coupling. Dimensional reduction to four dimensions reproduces the usual chiral effective action, and in particular we estimate the axial coupling $g_A$ between baryons and pions and the magnetic dipole moments, both of which are proportional to $N_c$. We extrapolate to finite $N_c$ and discuss subleading corrections.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#	sentence	role	the authors' own work	states the main conclusion	strength
s0	We study baryons in an AdS/CFT model of QCD by Sakai and Sugimoto, realized as small instantons with fundamental string hairs.	contribution 0.71	0.69	0.07	asserted 0.98
s1	We introduce an effective field theory of the baryons in the five-dimensional setting, and show that the instanton interpretation implies a particular magnetic coupling.	contribution 0.78	0.95	0.22	asserted 1.00
s2	Dimensional reduction to four dimensions reproduces the usual chiral effective action, and in particular we estimate the axial coupling $g_A$ between baryons and pions and the magnetic dipole moments, both of which are proportional to $N_c$.	result 0.96	0.92	0.44	asserted 0.99
s3	We extrapolate to finite $N_c$ and discuss subleading corrections.	contribution 0.77	0.87	0.07	unclear 0.54

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.99.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read

arXiv listing abstract v2

not examined

full text
figures and tables
references and citing sentences
relations to other papers

levels run

P abstract

not run

S sections
T body sentences
C citations
R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

References

Works cited (15)

[13]

See, e.g., R.F. Dashen, E. Jenkins and A.V. Manohar, Phys. Rev. D51, 3697 (1995)

View on Pith 1995
[9]

D. T. Son and M. A. Stephanov, Phys. Rev. D 69, 065020 (2004)

View on Pith 2004
[1]

We mode-expand BL,R(xµ,w ) = BL,R(xµ)fL,R(w), whereγ5BL,R = ±BL,R are four-dimensional chiral com- ponents, with the proﬁle functions fL,R(w) satisfying ∂wfL(w) +mb(w)fL(w) = mBfR(w), −∂wfR(w) +mb(w)fR(w) = mBfL(w). (18) The four-dimensional Dirac ﬁeld for the baryon is then reconstructed as B = (BL,B R)T . See Ref.[11] for a sim- ilar model. We will use ...

View on Pith 2006
[2]

J. M. Maldacena, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2, 231 (1998) [Int. J. Theor. Phys. 38, 1113 (1999)]

View on Pith 1998
[3]

T. Sakai and S. Sugimoto, Prog. Theor. Phys. 113, 843 (2005)

View on Pith 2005
[4]

M. Bando, T. Kugo and K. Yamawaki, Phys. Rept. 164, 217 (1988); M. Harada and K. Yamawaki, Phys. Rept. 381, 1 (2003)

View on Pith 1988
[5]

Y. Brihaye, C.T. Hill and C.K. Zachos, Phys. Rev. D70, 111502 (2004)

View on Pith 2004
[6]

M. Rho, in Nagoya 2004: Dynamical Symmetry Breaking p. 197, [arXiv:hep-ph/0502049]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2004
[7]

K. Nawa, H. Suganuma and T. Kojo, [arXiv:hep-th/0612187]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[8]

E. Witten, J. High Energy Phys. 07, 006 (1998)

View on Pith 1998
[10]

D.K. Hong, M. Rho, H.-U. Yee, and P. Yi, in preparation

View on Pith
[11]

G.S. Adkins, C.R. Nappi and E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B228, 552 (1983)

View on Pith 1983
[12]

D. K. Hong, T. Inami and H. U. Yee, Phys. Lett. B, to appear, [arXiv:hep-ph/0609270]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[14]

A. Jackson, A.D. Jackson and V. Pasquier, Nucl. Phys. A432, 567 (1985); R.D. Amado, R. Bijker and M. Oka, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 654 (1987); M. Luty, Phys. Rev. D 51, 2322 (1995)

View on Pith 1985
[15]

H. Hata, T. Sakai, S. Sugimoto and S. Yamato, [arXiv:hep-th/0701280]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

Forward citations

Cited by 26 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Holographic QCD with Dynamical Flavors
hep-th 2014-10 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

Analytic backreacted gravity solutions for the Witten-Sakai-Sugimoto model at first order in Nf/Nc yield flavor corrections to QCD-like observables and a covariant holographic renormalization scheme.
Rho meson condensation at finite isospin chemical potential in a holographic model for QCD
hep-th 2007-09 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

In the Sakai-Sugimoto holographic model, the rho meson becomes massless and condenses at an isospin chemical potential of about 1.7 times its zero-density mass, producing a new state that breaks rotational and residua...
Cool baryon and quark matter in holographic QCD
hep-ph 2019-03 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

Adding baryons to the V-QCD holographic model through a homogeneous non-Abelian bulk gauge field yields a three-phase cold dense matter diagram whose baryonic equation of state is stiffer than conformal.
From holography towards real-world nuclear matter
hep-ph 2015-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

In the Sakai-Sugimoto model, an instanton gas gives chiral restoration at high density but a second-order baryon onset, while a homogeneous gauge ansatz gives a first-order onset at finite coupling but no chiral restoration.
On Holographic Insulators and Supersolids
hep-th 2015-03 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

Adding momentum dissipation to holographic Einstein-Maxwell-scalar ground states keeps the AC conductivity gapped and discrete while removing the zero-frequency delta function, yielding insulator-like and supersolid-l...

Show 21 more citing papers

The Sakai-Sugimoto soliton
hep-th 2013-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

The Sakai-Sugimoto soliton's tail crosses from exponential to algebraic decay at a new scale of order the logarithm of the 't Hooft coupling, resolving contradictory form-factor results in the literature.
Nucleon electromagnetic and gravitational form factors from holography
hep-ph 2009-03 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

A five-dimensional holographic model of the nucleon reproduces the electromagnetic form factors and predicts a gravitational (momentum) radius near 0.58 fm, smaller than the charge radius.
Quark Mass Deformation of Holographic Massless QCD
hep-th 2008-03 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

Adding extra D-branes to the Sakai-Sugimoto model produces quark and pion masses through worldsheet instantons, yielding a GOR relation and a chiral condensate near (299 MeV)^3.
Dynamics of Baryons from String Theory and Vector Dominance
hep-th 2007-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

In the Sakai-Sugimoto holographic QCD model, a baryon is a small five-dimensional instanton whose two allowed couplings to the gauge field reproduce all nucleon-meson interactions and make nucleon electromagnetic form...
Baryon Number-Induced Chern-Simons Couplings of Vector and Axial-Vector Mesons in Holographic QCD
hep-ph 2007-04 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

At finite baryon density the five-dimensional Chern-Simons term of holographic QCD generates a rho-a1 mixing coupling proportional to baryon number, which becomes unstable above a critical density close to nuclear density.
Baryons from instantons in holographic QCD
hep-th 2007-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

In the D4/D8 holographic QCD model, a unit-baryon-number soliton is a BPST instanton whose size is stabilized by the Chern-Simons term, and quantizing its collective coordinates yields a baryon mass formula with the o...
Unified weak/strong coupling framework for nuclear matter and neutron stars
hep-ph 2020-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

Hybrid equations of state that switch from weak-coupling nuclear models to holographic V-QCD above roughly twice saturation density satisfy current neutron-star mass and tidal-deformability constraints, and predict th...
Kinematical and Dynamical Aspects of Higher-Spin Bound-State Equations in Holographic QCD
hep-ph 2013-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

A single effective action in a space asymptotic to anti-de Sitter yields bound-state wave equations for hadrons of arbitrary spin, with the geometry supplying light-front kinematics and its deformation supplying confinement.
Hadronic Form Factor Models and Spectroscopy Within the Gauge/Gravity Correspondence
hep-ph 2012-03 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

A light-front mapping to warped AdS space reproduces the light-hadron spectrum and elastic and transition form factors with one gap scale, though the baryon mass rules are fitted rather than derived.
Dense QCD: a Holographic Dyonic Salt
hep-th 2009-10 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

The holographic dual of dense large-N_c QCD is argued to be a body-centered salt of half-instanton dyons, reached from an fcc instanton crystal at roughly three times nuclear matter density.
Holographic Baryons : Static Properties and Form Factors from Gauge/String Duality
hep-th 2008-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

A gauge-invariant definition of chiral currents in the Sakai-Sugimoto holographic QCD model yields baryon charge radii, magnetic moments, axial couplings, and form factors that agree with experiment at the 20-30% leve...
Sakai-Sugimoto model, Tachyon Condensation and Chiral symmetry Breaking
hep-th 2007-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

Including the D8-anti-D8 tachyon in the Sakai-Sugimoto model admits asymptotic solutions in which tachyon condensation and chiral symmetry breaking happen at the same bulk point.
Light-Front Dynamics and AdS/QCD Correspondence: The Pion Form Factor in the Space- and Time-Like Regions
hep-ph 2007-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

The authors identify the fifth dimension of anti-de Sitter space with a light-front separation variable, yielding analytic pion wavefunctions and form factors that match space-like data with one fitted parameter.
Advances in the holographic description of hot and dense QCD matter
hep-ph 2026-08 accept novelty 4.0 of 10

A review of the QCD-like phase diagram from the Witten-Sakai-Sugimoto holographic model, including new metastable phases and improved descriptions of baryonic matter.
The Witten-Sakai-Sugimoto model: A brief review and some recent results
hep-th 2014-10 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

The Witten-Sakai-Sugimoto model reproduces many low-energy QCD quantities within about 15 to 20 percent and predicts a narrow scalar glueball near 1.5 GeV plus a magnetic-field-dependent chiral phase diagram.
Holographic modeling of nuclear matter and neutron stars
hep-ph 2021-10 accept novelty 3.0 of 10

Hybrid equations of state combining effective field theory at low density with the holographic V-QCD model at high density are feasible and yield neutron star radii of roughly 11 to 13 km, consistent with current mass...
Light-Front Holographic QCD and Emerging Confinement
hep-ph 2014-07 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

A harmonic light-front confinement potential, fixed by a conformal-algebra construction and mapped to a soft-wall AdS dilaton, yields a massless pion and linear Regge trajectories with one fitted scale.
Mesons in Gauge/Gravity Duals - A Review
hep-th 2007-11 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

Probe flavour branes in deformed, non-supersymmetric gravity duals reproduce confinement, a quark condensate, a Goldstone pion-like mode, and meson masses that track quenched lattice data at the ten-percent level.
Holographic approach to compact stars and their binary mergers
hep-th 2021-12 conditional novelty 2.0 of 10

Holographic models of dense QCD matter can be fitted to lattice and perturbative QCD constraints and yield neutron stars compatible with current mass, radius, and tidal-deformability data, but they generically predict...
Holographic Approaches to Hadron Structure
hep-ph 2026-10 unverdicted novelty 1.0 of 10

A review of holographic QCD that compiles top-down and bottom-up model predictions for hadron spectra, interactions, form factors, and gluonic states, with no new primary result.
Holographic QCD: Past, Present, and Future
hep-ph 2012-05 accept novelty 1.0 of 10

The paper reviews holographic QCD, connecting string theory and AdS/CFT to selected top-down D-brane models of strong-interaction physics.

How the literature uses it

67 arXiv papers cite this in 160 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 101 sentences without a confident label

Builds on it 3 papers

In this paper, we generalize the derivation of the interactions between mesons and nucleons carried out in Ref. [ref] to the interactions between mesons and baryons of arbitrary half-integer spins for the two-flavor case ($N_F=2$).

A Holographic QCD and Excited Baryons from String Theory · Summary · 1.00
Our solution is an extension of the $N_f=2$ solution of [ref] to a generic $N_f$,[ The baryon solution in the $N_f=2$ case is also analyzed in [ref] .

Baryons and the Chern-Simons term in holographic QCD with three flavors · Classical solution representing a baryon · 1.00
This analysis was later extended to other holographic models obtained from string theory, such as the Witten-Sakai-Sugimoto (WSS) model [ref] , with similar conclusions [ref] .

Holography in Quark-Gluon Plasma and Neutron Stars · Holography · 0.86

Uses its method or tool 3 papers

As shown in [ref] , one can replace the form factors by an infinite sum of vector-meson exchanges [ref] , if we expand the nonnormalizable photon field in terms of the normalizable vector meson $ψ_(2k+1)$ of mass $m_2k+1$ as [equation] where the decay constant of the $k$-th vector mesons is given as $g_v^(k)=m_2k+1^2ζ_k$ with [equation] where $U_KK$ is a parameter of the SS model and [equation] The resulting EM form factors then take the form

Integrating Holographic Vector Dominance to Hidden Local Symmetry for the Nucleon Form Factor · Holographic Form Factors · 0.81
The computation of the spectrum, as well as the quantization procedure, closely follow the soliton approach of [ref] , although the derivation of the Hamiltonian is different.

A Matrix Model for Baryons and Nuclear Forces · Single baryon · 0.97
In next section, we will derive the proposed effective action by generalizing a method originally due to Adkins, Nappi, and Witten [ref] and also adapted for holographic Nucleons in Refs. [ref] .

A Holographic QCD and Excited Baryons from String Theory · Effective Field Theory of the Instanton Soliton · 0.87

Uses its data or values 7 papers

Now turning to hVD, we will use the results of [ref] given in Table [ref] reproduced from [ref] .

Integrating Holographic Vector Dominance to Hidden Local Symmetry for the Nucleon Form Factor · sVD and hVD predictions · 0.99
Remember that the holographic size of the solitonic baryon is $≃9.6/(M_KK√(λ))$, where $λ$ is the 't Hooft coupling and $M_KK∼1$ GeV is the mass scale of the vector mesons [ref] .

A Matrix Model for Baryons and Nuclear Forces · Introduction · 0.95
For illustration purpose, we will take $λN_c=50$ as in [ref] .

Four-nucleon contact interactions from holographic QCD · Numerical results · 0.94

Compares with it 3 papers

Our prediction for $g_A$, whose experimental value is about 1.27, is [ref] [equation] With a subleading correction added, the extrapolated value is 0.84 which is about 30% better than Adkins-Nappi-Witten estimate [ref] based on the vanilla Skyrmion but worse than an improved Skyrmion dressed by the lowest lying $ρ$ meson with phenomenologically determined couplings [ref] .

Precision Holographic Baryons · Numbers and Comments · 0.99
To order $ħ^0$ the current is entirely vector meson dominated in overall agreement with the effective analysis in [ref] .

Electromagnetic Baryon Form Factors from Holographic QCD · Introduction · 0.90
The Hamiltonian [ref] for the instanton size modulus $ρ$ and the instanton location $Z$ along the $x^4$ direction is [equation] again without the rest mass term $λN_c M_KK/27π$.

A Matrix Model for Baryons and Nuclear Forces · Two flavors · 0.99

Cites it as support 4 papers

For the case of $s=1/2$, it was shown in [ref] that a direct coupling to the field strength $F=dA+iA^2$ to a bilinear of the spinor emulates this long range behavior of the quantized soliton.

A Holographic QCD and Excited Baryons from String Theory · Nonrelativistic Lagrangian · 0.96
As shown in [ref] , the Pauli term therefore should not contain the $U(1)$ gauge fields to reproduce the correct behavior of non-abelian instanton solitons at long distances, which leads to important sum rules for both the electric dipole moments and the anomalous magnetic moments of nucleons, which are model-independent and not subject to any $1/N_c$ corrections, [equation]

The Electric Dipole Moment of the Nucleons in Holographic QCD · Discussion and Conclusion · 0.98
Although we do not elaborate on the derivation here, we emphasize that not only the structure of the operator $B̅γ·FB$ (which happens to be also unique at dimension six level) but also the coefficient function have been derived rigorously [ref] .

Precision Holographic Baryons · An Effective Theory of Holographic Baryons · 0.97

Cites it as background 29 papers

As discussed extensively in [ref] and [ref] , the SU$(2)$ YM instanton in a curved space will generally collapse to zero size, in contrast to the situation in the flat space.

Skyrmion properties from holographic instantons of large size · Skyrmion properties from holographic instanton · 0.90
Baryons were introduced in the model in [ref] , while in the context of AdS/CFT correspondence description of baryons in terms of D-branes has a much longer history [ref] .

Holographic Nuclei · Gauge theory on nucleus · 0.93
To be specific, we are considering the popular top-down holographic QCD model, namely that of Witten-Sakai-Sugimoto (WSS) [ref] [ See also Refs. [ref] for a derivation of the chiral effective action from the WSS model, as well as an estimate of the axial coupling, magnetic dipole moments, electromagnetic form factors and vector dominance. ].

Boundary terms in the Witten-Sakai-Sugimoto model at finite density · Introduction · 0.89

Discussion

Disagree with the review, or know something it missed? Leave a comment, highlight any passage above to comment on it, or challenge this review formally.

[1] [13]

See, e.g., R.F. Dashen, E. Jenkins and A.V. Manohar, Phys. Rev. D51, 3697 (1995)

View on Pith 1995

[2] [9]

D. T. Son and M. A. Stephanov, Phys. Rev. D 69, 065020 (2004)

View on Pith 2004

[3] [1]

We mode-expand BL,R(xµ,w ) = BL,R(xµ)fL,R(w), whereγ5BL,R = ±BL,R are four-dimensional chiral com- ponents, with the proﬁle functions fL,R(w) satisfying ∂wfL(w) +mb(w)fL(w) = mBfR(w), −∂wfR(w) +mb(w)fR(w) = mBfL(w). (18) The four-dimensional Dirac ﬁeld for the baryon is then reconstructed as B = (BL,B R)T . See Ref.[11] for a sim- ilar model. We will use ...

View on Pith 2006

[4] [2]

J. M. Maldacena, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2, 231 (1998) [Int. J. Theor. Phys. 38, 1113 (1999)]

View on Pith 1998

[5] [3]

T. Sakai and S. Sugimoto, Prog. Theor. Phys. 113, 843 (2005)

View on Pith 2005

[6] [4]

M. Bando, T. Kugo and K. Yamawaki, Phys. Rept. 164, 217 (1988); M. Harada and K. Yamawaki, Phys. Rept. 381, 1 (2003)

View on Pith 1988

[7] [5]

Y. Brihaye, C.T. Hill and C.K. Zachos, Phys. Rev. D70, 111502 (2004)

View on Pith 2004

[8] [6]

M. Rho, in Nagoya 2004: Dynamical Symmetry Breaking p. 197, [arXiv:hep-ph/0502049]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2004

[9] [7]

K. Nawa, H. Suganuma and T. Kojo, [arXiv:hep-th/0612187]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[10] [8]

E. Witten, J. High Energy Phys. 07, 006 (1998)

View on Pith 1998

[11] [10]

D.K. Hong, M. Rho, H.-U. Yee, and P. Yi, in preparation

View on Pith

[12] [11]

G.S. Adkins, C.R. Nappi and E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B228, 552 (1983)

View on Pith 1983

[13] [12]

D. K. Hong, T. Inami and H. U. Yee, Phys. Lett. B, to appear, [arXiv:hep-ph/0609270]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[14] [14]

A. Jackson, A.D. Jackson and V. Pasquier, Nucl. Phys. A432, 567 (1985); R.D. Amado, R. Bijker and M. Oka, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 654 (1987); M. Luty, Phys. Rev. D 51, 2322 (1995)

View on Pith 1985

[15] [15]

H. Hata, T. Sakai, S. Sugimoto and S. Yamato, [arXiv:hep-th/0701280]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv