Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Statistics of intersecting D-brane models on T^6/Z_6

High Energy Physics - Theory · Submitted 1 Mar 2007

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim In particular we search for models with a standard model gauge group and discuss their statistical suppression.

how it is stated · asserted 0.66 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDhep-th/0703011 (version 3)
Pith IDLVRAEWGH, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationDieter Lust, Florian Gmeiner, Maren Stein. "Statistics of intersecting D-brane models on T^6/Z_6." arXiv:hep-th/0703011 (2007). https://pith.science/paper/LVRAEWGH
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,840 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.22 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.27 · randomized assignment 0.33 · states quantitative result 0.97 · compares with prior results 0.97 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v3. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We perform a statistical analysis of supersymmetric intersecting D-brane models on the type II orientifold T^6/Z_6. After providing an analytic proof of the finiteness of the number of possible solutions in this setup we study the frequency distributions of properties of the gauge group and the chiral matter content. In particular we search for models with a standard model gauge group and discuss their statistical suppression. The results are compared with the recent studies on T^6/Z_2xZ_2. The analysis is conducted using a statistical method, based on the choice of random subsets of the full ensemble of solutions. This method allows to calculate the total number of models with high precision to 3x10^28.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We perform a statistical analysis of supersymmetric intersecting D-brane models on the type II orientifold T^6/Z_6. contribution 1.00 0.96 0.06 asserted 0.98
s1 After providing an analytic proof of the finiteness of the number of possible solutions in this setup we study the frequency distributions of properties of the gauge group and the chiral matter content. contribution 0.98 0.95 0.11 asserted 1.00
s2 In particular we search for models with a standard model gauge group and discuss their statistical suppression. contribution 0.92 0.91 0.17 asserted 0.66
s3 The results are compared with the recent studies on T^6/Z_2xZ_2. contribution 0.41 0.49 0.04 asserted 0.94
s4 The analysis is conducted using a statistical method, based on the choice of random subsets of the full ensemble of solutions. method 1.00 0.91 0.03 asserted 1.00
s5 This method allows to calculate the total number of models with high precision to 3x10^28. result 0.69 0.92 0.13 asserted 0.99

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: simulation study 0.51 · evidence from simulation or computation 0.91.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v3
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We perform a statistical analysis of supersymmetric intersecting D-brane models on the type II orientifold T^6/Z_6. After providing an analytic proof of the finiteness of the number of possible solutions in this setup we study the frequency distributions of properties of the gauge group and the chiral matter content. In particular we search for models with a standard model gauge group and discuss their statistical suppression. The results are compared with the recent studies on T^6/Z_2xZ_2. The analysis is conducted using a statistical method, based on the choice of random subsets of the full ensemble of solutions. This method allows to calculate the total number of models with high precision to 3x10^28.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

6 arXiv papers cite this in 13 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 5 sentences without a confident label

Builds on it 2 papers
Compares with it 1 paper
  • On $T^6/_2 ×_2$ [ref] , the Pati-Salam relation [ref] on gauge couplings was fulfilled in 88% of the models, but less than 3% were compatible with the $SU(5)$ GUT relation [ref] on the non-Abelian gauge groups.[The analysis included only one and two generation models, since no explicit three generation model was found due to the cut-off method used for the statistical treatment.] In the $T^6/_6$ background with three generations [ref] , the situation was the reverse: since all D6-branes were wrapping the same bulk cycle, $α_s = α_w$ was fulfilled but the hyper charge as defined in table [ref] was not compatible with [ref].

    Millions of Standard Models on Z6-prime? · Gauge couplings · 0.99

Cites it as support 1 paper
Cites it as background 3 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.