Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Conformal non-Abelian Thirring models

High Energy Physics - Theory · Submitted 27 Jul 1993

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim It is shown that the space of non-Abelian Thirring models contains the nonperturbative conformal points which are in one-to-one correspondence with general solutions of the Virasoro master equation.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDhep-th/9307163 (version 3)
Pith IDIFTYEBP7, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationO. A. Soloviev. "Conformal non-Abelian Thirring models." arXiv:hep-th/9307163 (1993). https://pith.science/paper/IFTYEBP7
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 3,544 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.05 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.02 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.04 · compares with prior results 0.59 · mentions code or data availability 0.01.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v3. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

The Lie-Poisson structure of non-Abelian Thirring models is discussed and the Hamiltonian quantization of these theories is carried out. The consistency of the Hamiltonian quantization with the path integral method is established. It is shown that the space of non-Abelian Thirring models contains the nonperturbative conformal points which are in one-to-one correspondence with general solutions of the Virasoro master equation. A BRST nature of the mastert equation is clarified.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 The Lie-Poisson structure of non-Abelian Thirring models is discussed and the Hamiltonian quantization of these theories is carried out. contribution 0.96 0.87 0.09 asserted 0.99
s1 The consistency of the Hamiltonian quantization with the path integral method is established. result 0.87 0.87 0.10 asserted 1.00
s2 It is shown that the space of non-Abelian Thirring models contains the nonperturbative conformal points which are in one-to-one correspondence with general solutions of the Virasoro master equation. result 1.00 0.85 0.69 asserted 1.00
s3 A BRST nature of the mastert equation is clarified. result 0.56 0.85 0.12 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v3
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

The Lie-Poisson structure of non-Abelian Thirring models is discussed and the Hamiltonian quantization of these theories is carried out. The consistency of the Hamiltonian quantization with the path integral method is established. It is shown that the space of non-Abelian Thirring models contains the nonperturbative conformal points which are in one-to-one correspondence with general solutions of the Virasoro master equation. A BRST nature of the mastert equation is clarified.

Human review

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.