Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Construction of topological field theories using BV

High Energy Physics - Theory · Submitted 26 Oct 1993

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Finally, it is shown that the full energy momentum tensor is classically BRST exact in the antibracket sense.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDhep-th/9310166 (version 1)
Pith ID3AZ5CVQB, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationF. De Jonghe, S. Vandoren. "Construction of topological field theories using BV." arXiv:hep-th/9310166 (1993). https://pith.science/paper/3AZ5CVQB
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 7,374 input tokens, $0.0003 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.42 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.01 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.04 · compares with prior results 0.09 · mentions code or data availability 0.01.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We discuss in detail the construction of topological field theories using the Batalin--Vilkovisky (BV) quantisation scheme. By carefully examining the dependence of the antibracket on an external metric, we show that differentiating with respect to the metric and the BRST charge do not commute in general. We introduce the energy momentum tensor in this scheme and show that it is BRST invariant, both for the classical and quantum BRST operators. It is antifield dependent, guaranteeing gauge independence. For topological field theories, this energy momentum has to be quantum BRST exact. This leads to conditions at each order in $\hbar$. As an example of this procedure, we consider topological Yang--Mills theory. We show how the reducible set of symmetries used in topological Yang--Mills can be recovered by means of trivial systems and canonical transformations. Self duality of the antighosts is properly treated by introducing an infinite tower of auxiliary fields. Finally, it is shown that the full energy momentum tensor is classically BRST exact in the antibracket sense.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We discuss in detail the construction of topological field theories using the Batalin--Vilkovisky (BV) quantisation scheme. contribution 0.92 0.79 0.08 asserted 0.82
s1 By carefully examining the dependence of the antibracket on an external metric, we show that differentiating with respect to the metric and the BRST charge do not commute in general. result 0.90 0.94 0.19 asserted 1.00
s2 We introduce the energy momentum tensor in this scheme and show that it is BRST invariant, both for the classical and quantum BRST operators. result 0.61 0.94 0.14 asserted 1.00
s3 It is antifield dependent, guaranteeing gauge independence. result 0.82 0.69 0.07 asserted 1.00
s4 For topological field theories, this energy momentum has to be quantum BRST exact. result 0.68 0.61 0.18 asserted 1.00
s5 This leads to conditions at each order in $\hbar$. result 0.63 0.68 0.08 asserted 0.96
s6 As an example of this procedure, we consider topological Yang--Mills theory. contribution 0.54 0.81 0.03 asserted 0.80
s7 We show how the reducible set of symmetries used in topological Yang--Mills can be recovered by means of trivial systems and canonical transformations. contribution 0.43 0.92 0.06 asserted 1.00
s8 Self duality of the antighosts is properly treated by introducing an infinite tower of auxiliary fields. method 0.88 0.88 0.04 asserted 1.00
s9 Finally, it is shown that the full energy momentum tensor is classically BRST exact in the antibracket sense. result 1.00 0.93 0.23 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.74 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We discuss in detail the construction of topological field theories using the Batalin--Vilkovisky (BV) quantisation scheme. By carefully examining the dependence of the antibracket on an external metric, we show that differentiating with respect to the metric and the BRST charge do not commute in general. We introduce the energy momentum tensor in this scheme and show that it is BRST invariant, both for the classical and quantum BRST operators. It is antifield dependent, guaranteeing gauge independence. For topological field theories, this energy momentum has to be quantum BRST exact. This leads to conditions at each order in $\hbar$. As an example of this procedure, we consider topological Yang--Mills theory. We show how the reducible set of symmetries used in topological Yang--Mills can be recovered by means of trivial systems and canonical transformations. Self duality of the antighosts is properly treated by introducing an infinite tower of auxiliary fields. Finally, it is shown that the full energy momentum tensor is classically BRST exact in the antibracket sense.

Human review

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.