Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Critical O(N) - vector nonlinear sigma - models: A resume of their field structure

High Energy Physics - Theory · Submitted 8 Nov 1993

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim It is proved that the only conserved quasi - primary currents are the energy - momentum tensor and the O(N) - Noether currents.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDhep-th/9311046 (version 1)
Pith IDFHA52MVB, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationKlaus Lang, Werner Ruehl. "Critical O(N) - vector nonlinear sigma - models: A resume of their field structure." arXiv:hep-th/9311046 (1993). https://pith.science/paper/FHA52MVB
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,079 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.36 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.01 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.21 · compares with prior results 0.08 · mentions code or data availability 0.01.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

The classification of quasi - primary fields is outlined. It is proved that the only conserved quasi - primary currents are the energy - momentum tensor and the O(N) - Noether currents. Derivation of all quasi - primary fields and the resolution of degeneracy is sketched. Finally the limits d=2 and d=4 of the space dimension are discussed. Whereas the latter is trivial the former is only almost so.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 The classification of quasi - primary fields is outlined. contribution 0.96 0.73 0.07 asserted 0.95
s1 It is proved that the only conserved quasi - primary currents are the energy - momentum tensor and the O(N) - Noether currents. result 0.99 0.85 0.63 asserted 1.00
s2 Derivation of all quasi - primary fields and the resolution of degeneracy is sketched. contribution 0.86 0.82 0.09 asserted 0.81
s3 Finally the limits d=2 and d=4 of the space dimension are discussed. contribution 0.96 0.81 0.04 asserted 0.92
s4 Whereas the latter is trivial the former is only almost so. interpretation 0.72 0.43 0.05 asserted 0.98

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.74 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

The classification of quasi - primary fields is outlined. It is proved that the only conserved quasi - primary currents are the energy - momentum tensor and the O(N) - Noether currents. Derivation of all quasi - primary fields and the resolution of degeneracy is sketched. Finally the limits d=2 and d=4 of the space dimension are discussed. Whereas the latter is trivial the former is only almost so.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

3 arXiv papers cite this in 5 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it

Compares with it 2 papers
Cites it as background 2 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.