Pith. Sign in

RECORD

A Gauge Field Model On $SU(2)_L\times SU(2)_R\times U(1)_Y \times \pi_4(G_{YM})$

High Energy Physics - Theory · Submitted 24 Oct 1994

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We reconstruct the Lagrangian of a left-right symmetric model with the gauge group $SU(2)_L\times SU(2)_R\times U(1)_Y \times \pi_4(SU(2)_L\times SU(2)_R\times U(1)_Y) $.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDhep-th/9410172 (version 1)
Pith IDFQCSJWK4, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationBin Chen, Han-Ying Guo, Hong-Bo Teng, Ke Wu. "A Gauge Field Model On $SU(2)_L\times SU(2)_R\times U(1)_Y \times \pi_4(G_{YM})$." arXiv:hep-th/9410172 (1994). https://pith.science/paper/FQCSJWK4
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,559 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.06 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.01 · randomized assignment 0.02 · states quantitative result 0.03 · compares with prior results 0.05 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We reconstruct the Lagrangian of a left-right symmetric model with the gauge group $SU(2)_L\times SU(2)_R\times U(1)_Y \times \pi_4(SU(2)_L\times SU(2)_R\times U(1)_Y) $. The Higgs fields appear as gauge fields on discrete gauge group $\pi_4(SU(2)_L\times SU(2)_R\times U(1)_Y) $ and are assigned in a way complying with the principle that both the original gauge group $G_{YM}$ and the discrete group $\pi_4(G_{YM})$ should be taken as gauge groups in sense of non-commutative geometry.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We reconstruct the Lagrangian of a left-right symmetric model with the gauge group $SU(2)_L\times SU(2)_R\times U(1)_Y \times \pi_4(SU(2)_L\times SU(2)_R\times U(1)_Y) $. contribution 0.99 0.92 0.36 asserted 1.00
s1 The Higgs fields appear as gauge fields on discrete gauge group $\pi_4(SU(2)_L\times SU(2)_R\times U(1)_Y) $ and are assigned in a way complying with the principle that both the original gauge group $G_{YM}$ and the discrete group $\pi_4(G_{YM})$ should be taken as gauge groups in sense of non-commutative geometry. method 0.56 0.83 0.32 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.99.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We reconstruct the Lagrangian of a left-right symmetric model with the gauge group $SU(2)_L\times SU(2)_R\times U(1)_Y \times \pi_4(SU(2)_L\times SU(2)_R\times U(1)_Y) $. The Higgs fields appear as gauge fields on discrete gauge group $\pi_4(SU(2)_L\times SU(2)_R\times U(1)_Y) $ and are assigned in a way complying with the principle that both the original gauge group $G_{YM}$ and the discrete group $\pi_4(G_{YM})$ should be taken as gauge groups in sense of non-commutative geometry.

Human review

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.