RECORD
Perturbative Calculations in the Effective Lagrangian and $2D$ Closed String Field Theory
High Energy Physics - Theory · Submitted 5 Dec 1994
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim We show that the quadratic action and the pole structures of tree-level scattering amplitudes agree.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
This paper is devoted to the study of closed string field theory in two dimensions. We compare two different approaches: BRST closed string field theory and the string effective Lagrangian. We show that the quadratic action and the pole structures of tree-level scattering amplitudes agree. We study merits and drawbacks of various gauge fixing procedures. In particular, we discuss conformal gauge in the context of the effective Lagrangian, and Siegel and Lorentz-like gauge in the general BRST approach. We discuss the ways in which discrete states survive a particular gauge fixing both by directly solving the equations of motion, and by analyzing pole structure of the scattering amplitudes.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | This paper is devoted to the study of closed string field theory in two dimensions. | contribution 0.64 | 0.56 | 0.03 | asserted 0.92 |
| s1 | We compare two different approaches: BRST closed string field theory and the string effective Lagrangian. | contribution 0.62 | 0.73 | 0.04 | asserted 0.84 |
| s2 | We show that the quadratic action and the pole structures of tree-level scattering amplitudes agree. | result 1.00 | 0.93 | 0.57 | asserted 1.00 |
| s3 | We study merits and drawbacks of various gauge fixing procedures. | contribution 0.91 | 0.89 | 0.03 | asserted 0.62 |
| s4 | In particular, we discuss conformal gauge in the context of the effective Lagrangian, and Siegel and Lorentz-like gauge in the general BRST approach. | method 0.56 | 0.78 | 0.03 | asserted 0.83 |
| s5 | We discuss the ways in which discrete states survive a particular gauge fixing both by directly solving the equations of motion, and by analyzing pole structure of the scattering amplitudes. | method 0.51 | 0.90 | 0.09 | asserted 0.87 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v1
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
This paper is devoted to the study of closed string field theory in two dimensions. We compare two different approaches: BRST closed string field theory and the string effective Lagrangian. We show that the quadratic action and the pole structures of tree-level scattering amplitudes agree. We study merits and drawbacks of various gauge fixing procedures. In particular, we discuss conformal gauge in the context of the effective Lagrangian, and Siegel and Lorentz-like gauge in the general BRST approach. We discuss the ways in which discrete states survive a particular gauge fixing both by directly solving the equations of motion, and by analyzing pole structure of the scattering amplitudes.
Human review
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.