REVIEW 1 cited by
Axions and the Strong CP Problem in M-theory
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
We examine the possibility that the strong CP problem is solved by string-theoretic axions in strong-coupling limit of the E_8 x E_8 heterotic string theory (M-theory). We first discuss some generic features of gauge kinetic functions in compactified M-theory, and examine in detail the axion potential induced by the explicit breakings other than the QCD anomaly of the non-linear U(1)_{PQ} symmetries of string-theoretic axions. It is argued based on supersymmetry and discrete gauge symmetries that if the compactification radius is large enough, there can be a U(1)_{PQ}-symmetry whose breaking other than the QCD anomaly, whatever its microscopic origin is, is suppressed enough for the axion mechanism to work. Phenomenological viability of such a large radius crucially depends upon the quantized coefficients in gauge kinetic functions. We note that the large radius required for the axion mechanism is viable only in a limited class of models. For instance, for compactifications on a smooth Calabi-Yau manifold with a vanishing second E_8 field strength, it is viable only when the quantized flux of the antisymmetric tensor field in M-theory has a minimal nonzero value. It is also stressed that this large compactification radius allows the QCD axion in M-theory to be cosmologically viable in the presence of a late time entropy production.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Preheating Axions in String Cosmology
Preheating of closed-string axions in fibre inflation can overproduce dark matter, yielding new upper bounds on the axion mass and constraints on model parameters.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.