REVIEW 3 cited by
Non-perturbative Effects in AdS5 * S5 String Theory and d=4 SUSY Yang-Mills
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
We show that five-dimensional anti de-Sitter space remains a solution to low-energy type IIB supergravity when the leading higher-derivative corrections to the classical supergravity (which are non-perturbative in the string coupling) are included. Furthermore, at this order in the low energy expansion of the IIB theory the graviton two-point and three-point functions in $AdS_5 \times S^5$ are shown not to be renormalized and a precise expression is obtained for the four-graviton and related S-matrix elements. By invoking Maldacena's conjectured connection between IIB superstring theory and supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory corresponding statements are obtained concerning correlation functions of the energy-momentum tensor and related operators in the large-N Yang-Mills theory. This leads to interesting non-perturbative statements and insights into the r\^ole of instantons in the gauge theory.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
$\alpha'$-Bootstrap
An infinite-dimensional algebraic structure on a megaspace yields recursive, T-duality-covariant NS-NS α' and α'^{2} corrections matching known bosonic and heterotic results up to field redefinitions.
-
Heavy holographic correlators in defect conformal field theories
Holographic probe-brane calculations produce defect one- and two-point functions of heavy scalars that match OPE and BOE limits.
-
A Central Charge for sub-AdS Holography
Sub-AdS scales are mapped to sub-stacks of M < N D-branes, yielding a scale-dependent central charge c(R0) = (R0/L)^{d+q-1} c(L), with consistency checks from small black holes and Dp-brane theories.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.