Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Dual gluons and monopoles in 2+1 dimensional Yang-Mills theory

High Energy Physics - Theory · Submitted 18 Jun 1998

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim This would give a mass for the dual gluons resulting in confinement.

how it is stated · hedged possibility 0.77 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDhep-th/9806148 (version 1)
Pith IDWODCJ4JK, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationH. S. Sharatchandra, Pushan Majumdar, Ramesh Anishetty. "Dual gluons and monopoles in 2+1 dimensional Yang-Mills theory." arXiv:hep-th/9806148 (1998). https://pith.science/paper/WODCJ4JK
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,096 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.07 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.01 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.03 · compares with prior results 0.04 · mentions code or data availability 0.01.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

2+1-dimensional Yang-Mills theory is reinterpreted in terms of metrics on 3-manifolds. The dual gluons are related to diffeomorphisms of the 3-manifold. Monopoles are identified with points where the Ricci tensor has triply degenerate eigenvalues. The dual gluons have the desired interaction with these monopoles. This would give a mass for the dual gluons resulting in confinement.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 2+1-dimensional Yang-Mills theory is reinterpreted in terms of metrics on 3-manifolds. contribution 0.83 0.75 0.10 asserted 1.00
s1 The dual gluons are related to diffeomorphisms of the 3-manifold. interpretation 0.49 0.67 0.10 asserted 1.00
s2 Monopoles are identified with points where the Ricci tensor has triply degenerate eigenvalues. result 0.42 0.75 0.18 asserted 1.00
s3 The dual gluons have the desired interaction with these monopoles. result 0.88 0.60 0.15 asserted 0.98
s4 This would give a mass for the dual gluons resulting in confinement. interpretation 0.94 0.38 0.63 hedged possibility 0.77

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.98 · evidence from argument 0.70.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

2+1-dimensional Yang-Mills theory is reinterpreted in terms of metrics on 3-manifolds. The dual gluons are related to diffeomorphisms of the 3-manifold. Monopoles are identified with points where the Ricci tensor has triply degenerate eigenvalues. The dual gluons have the desired interaction with these monopoles. This would give a mass for the dual gluons resulting in confinement.

Human review
How the literature uses it

3 arXiv papers cite this in 7 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 6 sentences without a confident label

Cites it as background 1 paper

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.