Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Duality in SU(N) x SU(N') Product Group from M theory

High Energy Physics - Theory · Submitted 19 Jun 1998

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We show that the type IIA brane configurations for dual gauge theories are in fact two special limits of the same M-theory 5-brane, just as in the case of the simple SU(N) group.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDhep-th/9806170 (version 2)
Pith ID5YMO7F57, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationJulian Lee, Sang-Jin Sin. "Duality in SU(N) x SU(N') Product Group from M theory." arXiv:hep-th/9806170 (1998). https://pith.science/paper/5YMO7F57
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,311 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.07 · states limitation 0.06 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.04 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.03 · compares with prior results 0.87 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We generalize the M-theoretic duality of Schmaltz and Sundrum to the product group SU(N) x SU(N') case. We show that the type IIA brane configurations for dual gauge theories are in fact two special limits of the same M-theory 5-brane, just as in the case of the simple SU(N) group.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We generalize the M-theoretic duality of Schmaltz and Sundrum to the product group SU(N) x SU(N') case. contribution 1.00 0.92 0.17 asserted 0.97
s1 We show that the type IIA brane configurations for dual gauge theories are in fact two special limits of the same M-theory 5-brane, just as in the case of the simple SU(N) group. result 0.98 0.92 0.71 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.87.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We generalize the M-theoretic duality of Schmaltz and Sundrum to the product group SU(N) x SU(N') case. We show that the type IIA brane configurations for dual gauge theories are in fact two special limits of the same M-theory 5-brane, just as in the case of the simple SU(N) group.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

1 arXiv paper cite this in 1 sentence

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it

Cites it as background 1 paper
  • It was soon extended to $SO$ and $USp$ gauge theories with vector matter [ref] , to theories with adjoint or rank-two tensor matter [ref] , and to theories with product gauge groups [ref] .

    Seiberg dualities for quiver gauge theories · Background and motivation · 0.83

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.