RECORD
On the relation of Matrix theory and Maldacena conjecture
High Energy Physics - Theory · Submitted 23 Jun 1998
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim We report a sign that M(atrix) theory conjecture and the Maldacena conjecture for the case of D0-branes are compatible.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
We report a sign that M(atrix) theory conjecture and the Maldacena conjecture for the case of D0-branes are compatible. Furthermore Maldacena point of view implies a restriction of range of validity in the DLCQ version of M(atrix) theory. The analysis is based on the uplift of type IIA supersymetric solution in the Maldacena approach to eleven dimensions, using a boost as a main tool. The relation is explored on both, IMF and DLCF versions of M(atrix) theory
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | We report a sign that M(atrix) theory conjecture and the Maldacena conjecture for the case of D0-branes are compatible. | result 0.99 | 0.88 | 0.88 | hedged possibility 0.96 |
| s1 | Furthermore Maldacena point of view implies a restriction of range of validity in the DLCQ version of M(atrix) theory. | interpretation 0.73 | 0.58 | 0.15 | asserted 0.95 |
| s2 | The analysis is based on the uplift of type IIA supersymetric solution in the Maldacena approach to eleven dimensions, using a boost as a main tool. | method 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.04 | asserted 0.98 |
| s3 | The relation is explored on both, IMF and DLCF versions of M(atrix) theory | contribution 0.52 | 0.81 | 0.05 | asserted 0.89 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v1
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
We report a sign that M(atrix) theory conjecture and the Maldacena conjecture for the case of D0-branes are compatible. Furthermore Maldacena point of view implies a restriction of range of validity in the DLCQ version of M(atrix) theory. The analysis is based on the uplift of type IIA supersymetric solution in the Maldacena approach to eleven dimensions, using a boost as a main tool. The relation is explored on both, IMF and DLCF versions of M(atrix) theory
Human review
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.