Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Energy-Momentum Conservation and Holographic S-Matrix

PaperPDF from arXiv

data files

Paper breakdownThe authors' claims, conditions and measurements, as JSON Signed receiptProof this review has not been altered
X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit Hacker News
Miao Li

High Energy Physics - Theory · Submitted 26 Apr 1999

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim It is shown that the conservation law is not a natural consequence of conformal invariance in the large N limit.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDhep-th/9904164 (version 1)
Pith IDKMUTKAAY, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationMiao Li. "Energy-Momentum Conservation and Holographic S-Matrix." arXiv:hep-th/9904164 (1999). https://pith.science/paper/KMUTKAAY
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 3,499 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.91 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.03 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.08 · compares with prior results 0.44 · mentions code or data availability 0.01.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We investigate the consequence of the energy-momentum conservation law for the holographic S-matrix from AdS/CFT correspondence. It is shown that the conservation law is not a natural consequence of conformal invariance in the large N limit. We predict a new singularity for the four point correlation function of a marginal operator. Only the two point scattering amplitude is explicitly calculated, and the result agrees with what is expected.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We investigate the consequence of the energy-momentum conservation law for the holographic S-matrix from AdS/CFT correspondence. contribution 0.91 0.87 0.07 unclear 0.63
s1 It is shown that the conservation law is not a natural consequence of conformal invariance in the large N limit. result 0.99 0.81 0.47 asserted 1.00
s2 We predict a new singularity for the four point correlation function of a marginal operator. result 0.95 0.85 0.30 asserted 0.81
s3 Only the two point scattering amplitude is explicitly calculated, and the result agrees with what is expected. limitation 0.87 0.94 0.07 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.97.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We investigate the consequence of the energy-momentum conservation law for the holographic S-matrix from AdS/CFT correspondence. It is shown that the conservation law is not a natural consequence of conformal invariance in the large N limit. We predict a new singularity for the four point correlation function of a marginal operator. Only the two point scattering amplitude is explicitly calculated, and the result agrees with what is expected.

Human review

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

References

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.