Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Canonical Formulation of the Light-Front Gluodynamics and Quantization of the Non-Abelian Plane Waves

High Energy Physics - Theory · Submitted 20 Oct 1999

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We obtain, therefore, a quantized form of the classical solutions previously known as non-Abelian plane waves.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDhep-th/9910157 (version 3)
CitationAmes), Grigorii B. Pivovarov (INR, James P. Vary (IITAP & Iowa State, Moscow), Moscow & IITAP, St.Petersburg & IITAP, Victor A. Matveev (INR, Victor T. Kim (PNPI. "Canonical Formulation of the Light-Front Gluodynamics and Quantization of the Non-Abelian Plane Waves." arXiv:hep-th/9910157 (1999). https://pith.science/paper/hep-th/9910157
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 6,179 input tokens, $0.0003 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.78 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.04 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.08 · compares with prior results 0.88 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v3. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Without a gauge fixing, canonical variables for the light-front SU(2) gluodynamics are determined. The Gauss law is written in terms of the canonical variables. The system is qualified as a generalized dynamical system with first class constraints. Abeliazation is a specific feature of the formulation (most of the canonical variables transform nontrivially only under the action of an Abelian subgroup of the gauge transformations). At finite volume, a discrete spectrum of the light-front Hamiltonian $P_+$ is obtained in the sector of vanishing $P_-$. We obtain, therefore, a quantized form of the classical solutions previously known as non-Abelian plane waves. Then, considering the infinite volume limit, we find that the presence of the mass gap depends on the way the infinite volume limit is taken, which may suggest the presence of different ``phases'' of the infinite volume theory. We also check that the formulation obtained is in accord with the standard perturbation theory if the latter is taken in the covariant gauges.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Without a gauge fixing, canonical variables for the light-front SU(2) gluodynamics are determined. contribution 0.68 0.88 0.11 asserted 1.00
s1 The Gauss law is written in terms of the canonical variables. contribution 0.61 0.87 0.04 asserted 1.00
s2 The system is qualified as a generalized dynamical system with first class constraints. result 0.71 0.82 0.08 asserted 1.00
s3 Abeliazation is a specific feature of the formulation (most of the canonical variables transform nontrivially only under the action of an Abelian subgroup of the gauge transformations). result 0.85 0.77 0.08 asserted 1.00
s4 At finite volume, a discrete spectrum of the light-front Hamiltonian $P_+$ is obtained in the sector of vanishing $P_-$. result 1.00 0.92 0.12 asserted 1.00
s5 We obtain, therefore, a quantized form of the classical solutions previously known as non-Abelian plane waves. result 0.90 0.94 0.49 asserted 1.00
s6 Then, considering the infinite volume limit, we find that the presence of the mass gap depends on the way the infinite volume limit is taken, which may suggest the presence of different ``phases'' of the infinite volume theory. interpretation 0.61 0.95 0.20 hedged possibility 0.86
s7 We also check that the formulation obtained is in accord with the standard perturbation theory if the latter is taken in the covariant gauges. result 0.91 0.89 0.07 asserted 0.88

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.98 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v3
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Without a gauge fixing, canonical variables for the light-front SU(2) gluodynamics are determined. The Gauss law is written in terms of the canonical variables. The system is qualified as a generalized dynamical system with first class constraints. Abeliazation is a specific feature of the formulation (most of the canonical variables transform nontrivially only under the action of an Abelian subgroup of the gauge transformations). At finite volume, a discrete spectrum of the light-front Hamiltonian $P_+$ is obtained in the sector of vanishing $P_-$. We obtain, therefore, a quantized form of the classical solutions previously known as non-Abelian plane waves. Then, considering the infinite volume limit, we find that the presence of the mass gap depends on the way the infinite volume limit is taken, which may suggest the presence of different ``phases'' of the infinite volume theory. We also check that the formulation obtained is in accord with the standard perturbation theory if the latter is taken in the covariant gauges.

Human review

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.