Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Perturbative analysis on infrared aspects of noncommutative QED on R^4

High Energy Physics - Theory · Submitted 12 Dec 1999

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim The explicit calculation of the finite part of the photon vacuum polarization shows the singularity ln({q C^TC q}) (C^{\mu\nu} is a noncommutative parameter.) in the infrared side which also exists in noncommutative Yang-Mills theory.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDhep-th/9912094 (version 3)
Pith IDUNRF4D7X, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationM.Hayakawa. "Perturbative analysis on infrared aspects of noncommutative QED on R^4." arXiv:hep-th/9912094 (1999). https://pith.science/paper/UNRF4D7X
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 6,816 input tokens, $0.0003 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.76 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.02 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.17 · compares with prior results 0.56 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v3. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Here we examine the noncommutative counterpart of QED, which is called as noncommutative QED. The theory is obtained by examining the consistent minimal coupling to noncommutative U(1) gauge field. The *-product admits the coupling of the matter with only three varieties of charges, i.e., 0, +1 and -1. Ultraviolet divergence can be absorbed into the rescaling of the fields and the parameters at least at one loop level. To examine the infrared aspect of the theory the anomalous magnetic dipole moment is calculated. The dependence on the direction of photon momentum reflects the Lorentz symmetry violation of the system. The explicit calculation of the finite part of the photon vacuum polarization shows the singularity ln({q C^TC q}) (C^{\mu\nu} is a noncommutative parameter.) in the infrared side which also exists in noncommutative Yang-Mills theory. It is associated with the ultraviolet behavior of the theory. We also consider the extension to chiral gauge theory in the present context, but the requirement of anomaly cancellation allows only noncommutative QED.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Here we examine the noncommutative counterpart of QED, which is called as noncommutative QED. contribution 0.62 0.54 0.03 asserted 0.98
s1 The theory is obtained by examining the consistent minimal coupling to noncommutative U(1) gauge field. method 0.59 0.58 0.03 asserted 1.00
s2 The *-product admits the coupling of the matter with only three varieties of charges, i.e., 0, +1 and -1. result 0.64 0.50 0.05 asserted 1.00
s3 Ultraviolet divergence can be absorbed into the rescaling of the fields and the parameters at least at one loop level. result 0.99 0.69 0.10 asserted 0.61
s4 To examine the infrared aspect of the theory the anomalous magnetic dipole moment is calculated. method 0.71 0.91 0.06 asserted 0.95
s5 The dependence on the direction of photon momentum reflects the Lorentz symmetry violation of the system. interpretation 0.91 0.69 0.09 asserted 1.00
s6 The explicit calculation of the finite part of the photon vacuum polarization shows the singularity ln({q C^TC q}) (C^{\mu\nu} is a noncommutative parameter.) in the infrared side which also exists in noncommutative Yang-Mills theory. result 1.00 0.89 0.37 asserted 1.00
s7 It is associated with the ultraviolet behavior of the theory. interpretation 0.99 0.48 0.10 asserted 1.00
s8 We also consider the extension to chiral gauge theory in the present context, but the requirement of anomaly cancellation allows only noncommutative QED. result 0.47 0.78 0.16 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.99.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v3
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Here we examine the noncommutative counterpart of QED, which is called as noncommutative QED. The theory is obtained by examining the consistent minimal coupling to noncommutative U(1) gauge field. The *-product admits the coupling of the matter with only three varieties of charges, i.e., 0, +1 and -1. Ultraviolet divergence can be absorbed into the rescaling of the fields and the parameters at least at one loop level. To examine the infrared aspect of the theory the anomalous magnetic dipole moment is calculated. The dependence on the direction of photon momentum reflects the Lorentz symmetry violation of the system. The explicit calculation of the finite part of the photon vacuum polarization shows the singularity ln({q C^TC q}) (C^{\mu\nu} is a noncommutative parameter.) in the infrared side which also exists in noncommutative Yang-Mills theory. It is associated with the ultraviolet behavior of the theory. We also consider the extension to chiral gauge theory in the present context, but the requirement of anomaly cancellation allows only noncommutative QED.

Human review
References
How later papers used it

56 later papers cite it

Evidence: substantial. 56 of the citing papers share no author with it, and 11 of those carry a confident label from Pith's citation classifier.

Pith read 17 of the 80 citing sentences, choosing only those whose citation markers point at this paper alone, and wrote the paraphrases from them. The summary, the counts, the evidence level, the links and the quotes come from code; the summary counts the papers listed below. A later paper is listed under a label when Pith's citation classifier gives one of its sentences that label at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), Pith's reading finds that the citing paper itself did it, and a second check confirms the paraphrase against the sentence. This section lists uses only. It does not list criticism or disagreement, so their absence here says nothing about how the paper has been received. Papers that share an author with this one are listed apart, under "By the same authors". A quote is the citing authors' own sentence, shown when their paper's licence is CC BY, CC BY-SA or CC0. JSON

Compares with it 1 of 9 papers with this label
How the literature uses it

52 arXiv papers cite this in 76 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 45 sentences without a confident label

Uses its method or tool 1 paper
Compares with it 9 papers
Cites it as support 3 papers
Cites it as background 14 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.