RECORD
Glueball Spin
High Energy Physics - Theory · Submitted 15 Dec 1999
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim In light of the difficulties in accounting for the spin of the proton from its constituent quarks, the spin of glueballs is reexamined.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
The spin of a glueball is usually taken as coming from the spin (and possibly the orbital angular momentum) of its constituent gluons. In light of the difficulties in accounting for the spin of the proton from its constituent quarks, the spin of glueballs is reexamined. The starting point is the fundamental QCD field angular momentum operator written in terms of the chromoelectric and chromomagnetic fields. First, we look at the restrictions placed on the structure of glueballs from the requirement that the QCD field angular momentum operator should satisfy the standard commutation relationships. This can be compared to the electromagnetic charge/monopole system, where the quantization of the field angular momentum places restrictions (i.e. the Dirac condition) on the system. Second, we look at the expectation value of this operator under some simplifying assumptions.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | The spin of a glueball is usually taken as coming from the spin (and possibly the orbital angular momentum) of its constituent gluons. | background 1.00 | 0.04 | 0.03 | asserted 0.63 |
| s1 | In light of the difficulties in accounting for the spin of the proton from its constituent quarks, the spin of glueballs is reexamined. | background 0.70 | 0.31 | 0.04 | asserted 0.81 |
| s2 | The starting point is the fundamental QCD field angular momentum operator written in terms of the chromoelectric and chromomagnetic fields. | method 0.94 | 0.57 | 0.03 | asserted 0.94 |
| s3 | First, we look at the restrictions placed on the structure of glueballs from the requirement that the QCD field angular momentum operator should satisfy the standard commutation relationships. | method 0.76 | 0.68 | 0.04 | asserted 0.82 |
| s4 | This can be compared to the electromagnetic charge/monopole system, where the quantization of the field angular momentum places restrictions (i.e. the Dirac condition) on the system. | method 0.44 | 0.10 | 0.04 | asserted 0.95 |
| s5 | Second, we look at the expectation value of this operator under some simplifying assumptions. | method 0.93 | 0.85 | 0.03 | asserted 0.51 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v3
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
The spin of a glueball is usually taken as coming from the spin (and possibly the orbital angular momentum) of its constituent gluons. In light of the difficulties in accounting for the spin of the proton from its constituent quarks, the spin of glueballs is reexamined. The starting point is the fundamental QCD field angular momentum operator written in terms of the chromoelectric and chromomagnetic fields. First, we look at the restrictions placed on the structure of glueballs from the requirement that the QCD field angular momentum operator should satisfy the standard commutation relationships. This can be compared to the electromagnetic charge/monopole system, where the quantization of the field angular momentum places restrictions (i.e. the Dirac condition) on the system. Second, we look at the expectation value of this operator under some simplifying assumptions.
Human review
How the literature uses it
1 arXiv paper cite this in 1 sentence
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.