Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Decay of correlations in nearest-neighbor self-avoiding walk, percolation, lattice trees and animals

Mathematical Physics · Submitted 6 Apr 2005

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Using the lace expansion, we prove that the two-point function at the critical point is asymptotic to $\mathit{const.}|x|^{2-d}$ as $|x|\to\infty$, for $d\geq 5$ for self-avoiding walk, for $d\geq19$ for percolation, and for sufficiently large $d$ for lattice trees and animals.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDmath-ph/0504021 (version 3)
Pith IDOQZUAXVF, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationTakashi Hara. "Decay of correlations in nearest-neighbor self-avoiding walk, percolation, lattice trees and animals." arXiv:math-ph/0504021 (2005). https://pith.science/paper/OQZUAXVF
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 5,285 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.05 · states limitation 0.50 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.03 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.93 · compares with prior results 0.96 · mentions code or data availability 0.01.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v3. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We consider nearest-neighbor self-avoiding walk, bond percolation, lattice trees, and bond lattice animals on ${\mathbb{Z}}^d$. The two-point functions of these models are respectively the generating function for self-avoiding walks from the origin to $x\in{\mathbb{Z}}^d$, the probability of a connection from the origin to $x$, and the generating functions for lattice trees or lattice animals containing the origin and $x$. Using the lace expansion, we prove that the two-point function at the critical point is asymptotic to $\mathit{const.}|x|^{2-d}$ as $|x|\to\infty$, for $d\geq 5$ for self-avoiding walk, for $d\geq19$ for percolation, and for sufficiently large $d$ for lattice trees and animals. These results are complementary to those of [Ann. Probab. 31 (2003) 349--408], where spread-out models were considered. In the course of the proof, we also provide a sufficient (and rather sharp if $d>4$) condition under which the two-point function of a random walk on ${{\mathbb{Z}}^d}$ is asymptotic to $\mathit{const.}|x|^{2-d}$ as $|x|\to\infty$.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We consider nearest-neighbor self-avoiding walk, bond percolation, lattice trees, and bond lattice animals on ${\mathbb{Z}}^d$. background 0.79 0.26 0.02 asserted 0.63
s1 The two-point functions of these models are respectively the generating function for self-avoiding walks from the origin to $x\in{\mathbb{Z}}^d$, the probability of a connection from the origin to $x$, and the generating functions for lattice trees or lattice animals containing the origin and $x$. background 0.99 0.12 0.03 asserted 1.00
s2 Using the lace expansion, we prove that the two-point function at the critical point is asymptotic to $\mathit{const.}|x|^{2-d}$ as $|x|\to\infty$, for $d\geq 5$ for self-avoiding walk, for $d\geq19$ for percolation, and for sufficiently large $d$ for lattice trees and animals. result 0.99 0.96 0.92 asserted 1.00
s3 These results are complementary to those of [Ann. background 0.73 0.08 0.02 unclear 0.71
s4 Probab. 31 (2003) 349--408], where spread-out models were considered. background 0.90 0.06 0.02 unclear 0.74
s5 In the course of the proof, we also provide a sufficient (and rather sharp if $d>4$) condition under which the two-point function of a random walk on ${{\mathbb{Z}}^d}$ is asymptotic to $\mathit{const.}|x|^{2-d}$ as $|x|\to\infty$. result 0.83 0.94 0.05 asserted 0.99

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v3
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We consider nearest-neighbor self-avoiding walk, bond percolation, lattice trees, and bond lattice animals on ${\mathbb{Z}}^d$. The two-point functions of these models are respectively the generating function for self-avoiding walks from the origin to $x\in{\mathbb{Z}}^d$, the probability of a connection from the origin to $x$, and the generating functions for lattice trees or lattice animals containing the origin and $x$. Using the lace expansion, we prove that the two-point function at the critical point is asymptotic to $\mathit{const.}|x|^{2-d}$ as $|x|\to\infty$, for $d\geq 5$ for self-avoiding walk, for $d\geq19$ for percolation, and for sufficiently large $d$ for lattice trees and animals. These results are complementary to those of [Ann. Probab. 31 (2003) 349--408], where spread-out models were considered. In the course of the proof, we also provide a sufficient (and rather sharp if $d>4$) condition under which the two-point function of a random walk on ${{\mathbb{Z}}^d}$ is asymptotic to $\mathit{const.}|x|^{2-d}$ as $|x|\to\infty$.

Human review

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.