Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Realizability of point processes

Mathematical Physics · Submitted 23 Dec 2006

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Here we describe some necessary and sufficient conditions on the $\rho_j$'s for this to be true.

how it is stated · asserted 0.98 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDmath-ph/0612075 (version 2)
Pith IDVZ47U26J, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationE. R. Speer, J. L. Lebowitz, T. Kuna. "Realizability of point processes." arXiv:math-ph/0612075 (2006). https://pith.science/paper/VZ47U26J
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 5,219 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.05 · states limitation 0.90 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.02 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.38 · compares with prior results 0.88 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

There are various situations in which it is natural to ask whether a given collection of $k$ functions, $\rho_j(\r_1,...,\r_j)$, $j=1,...,k$, defined on a set $X$, are the first $k$ correlation functions of a point process on $X$. Here we describe some necessary and sufficient conditions on the $\rho_j$'s for this to be true. Our primary examples are $X=\mathbb{R}^d$, $X=\matbb{Z}^d$, and $X$ an arbitrary finite set. In particular, we extend a result by Ambartzumian and Sukiasian showing realizability at sufficiently small densities $\rho_1(\mathbf{r})$. Typically if any realizing process exists there will be many (even an uncountable number); in this case we prove, when $X$ is a finite set, the existence of a realizing Gibbs measure with $k$ body potentials which maximizes the entropy among all realizing measures. We also investigate in detail a simple example in which a uniform density $\rho$ and translation invariant $\rho_2$ are specified on $\mathbb{Z}$; there is a gap between our best upper bound on possible values of $\rho$ and the largest $\rho$ for which realizability can be established.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 There are various situations in which it is natural to ask whether a given collection of $k$ functions, $\rho_j(\r_1,...,\r_j)$, $j=1,...,k$, defined on a set $X$, are the first $k$ correlation functions of a point process on $X$. background 1.00 0.08 0.04 asserted 0.70
s1 Here we describe some necessary and sufficient conditions on the $\rho_j$'s for this to be true. contribution 0.91 0.92 0.43 asserted 0.98
s2 Our primary examples are $X=\mathbb{R}^d$, $X=\matbb{Z}^d$, and $X$ an arbitrary finite set. contribution 0.54 0.59 0.04 asserted 0.96
s3 In particular, we extend a result by Ambartzumian and Sukiasian showing realizability at sufficiently small densities $\rho_1(\mathbf{r})$. contribution 0.69 0.77 0.09 asserted 1.00
s4 Typically if any realizing process exists there will be many (even an uncountable number); in this case we prove, when $X$ is a finite set, the existence of a realizing Gibbs measure with $k$ body potentials which maximizes the entropy among all realizing measures. result 0.91 0.94 0.17 asserted 0.96
s5 We also investigate in detail a simple example in which a uniform density $\rho$ and translation invariant $\rho_2$ are specified on $\mathbb{Z}$; there is a gap between our best upper bound on possible values of $\rho$ and the largest $\rho$ for which realizability can be established. limitation 0.43 0.94 0.06 asserted 0.99

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

There are various situations in which it is natural to ask whether a given collection of $k$ functions, $\rho_j(\r_1,...,\r_j)$, $j=1,...,k$, defined on a set $X$, are the first $k$ correlation functions of a point process on $X$. Here we describe some necessary and sufficient conditions on the $\rho_j$'s for this to be true. Our primary examples are $X=\mathbb{R}^d$, $X=\matbb{Z}^d$, and $X$ an arbitrary finite set. In particular, we extend a result by Ambartzumian and Sukiasian showing realizability at sufficiently small densities $\rho_1(\mathbf{r})$. Typically if any realizing process exists there will be many (even an uncountable number); in this case we prove, when $X$ is a finite set, the existence of a realizing Gibbs measure with $k$ body potentials which maximizes the entropy among all realizing measures. We also investigate in detail a simple example in which a uniform density $\rho$ and translation invariant $\rho_2$ are specified on $\mathbb{Z}$; there is a gap between our best upper bound on possible values of $\rho$ and the largest $\rho$ for which realizability can be established.

Human review

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.