Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Ecuaciones Del Segundo Orden En la Representacion (1/2,0)+(0,1/2) Del Grupo De Lorentz Derivadas De Los Postulados De Ryder

Mathematical Physics · Submitted 3 Jun 1999

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We derive the second-order equations in the (1/2,0)+(0,1/2) representation on using the Ryder postulates.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDmath-ph/9906002 (version 1)
Pith IDCBCJAWIE, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationValeri V. Dvoeglazov (EF-UAZ). "Ecuaciones Del Segundo Orden En la Representacion (1/2,0)+(0,1/2) Del Grupo De Lorentz Derivadas De Los Postulados De Ryder." arXiv:math-ph/9906002 (1999). https://pith.science/paper/CBCJAWIE
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,888 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.07 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.02 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.03 · compares with prior results 0.66 · mentions code or data availability 0.01.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We derive the second-order equations in the (1/2,0)+(0,1/2) representation on using the Ryder postulates. Similar equations has been proposed in the 60s and the 70s in order to understand different mass states of leptons. We give some additional discernments to this problem.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We derive the second-order equations in the (1/2,0)+(0,1/2) representation on using the Ryder postulates. contribution 0.92 0.96 0.59 asserted 1.00
s1 Similar equations has been proposed in the 60s and the 70s in order to understand different mass states of leptons. background 1.00 0.03 0.04 asserted 1.00
s2 We give some additional discernments to this problem. contribution 1.00 0.83 0.09 asserted 0.86

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We derive the second-order equations in the (1/2,0)+(0,1/2) representation on using the Ryder postulates. Similar equations has been proposed in the 60s and the 70s in order to understand different mass states of leptons. We give some additional discernments to this problem.

Human review
How the literature uses it

Papers whose main result relates to this one's

How each label was checked · JSON

Found among the papers closest to this one by title and main claim. Pith's classifier compared each pair's main results and a second model family confirmed the relation; checked against two further families, shown conflicts agreed 118 times in 120 and shown same results 218 times in 239. The quoted sentence is the other paper's main claim.

States the same result 1 paper

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.