Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Two-point Taylor Expansions of Analytic Functions

Classical Analysis and ODEs · Submitted 7 May 2002

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Cauchy-type formulas are given for coefficients and remainders in the expansions, and the regions of convergence are indicated.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDmath/0205064 (version 1)
Pith IDB2KZM6O3, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
Citation(2) CWI, Amsterdam), Jose L. Lopez (1), Nico M. Temme (2) ((1) Universidad Publica de Navarra, Pamplona. "Two-point Taylor Expansions of Analytic Functions." arXiv:math/0205064 (2002). https://pith.science/paper/B2KZM6O3
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 3,445 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.02 · states limitation 0.07 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.01 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.05 · compares with prior results 0.06 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Taylor expansions of analytic functions are considered with respect to two points. Cauchy-type formulas are given for coefficients and remainders in the expansions, and the regions of convergence are indicated. It is explained how these expansions can be used in deriving uniform asymptotic expansions of integrals. The method is also used for obtaining Laurent expansions in two points.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Taylor expansions of analytic functions are considered with respect to two points. background 0.59 0.53 0.09 asserted 0.96
s1 Cauchy-type formulas are given for coefficients and remainders in the expansions, and the regions of convergence are indicated. contribution 0.71 0.87 0.19 asserted 1.00
s2 It is explained how these expansions can be used in deriving uniform asymptotic expansions of integrals. contribution 0.66 0.73 0.17 asserted 0.95
s3 The method is also used for obtaining Laurent expansions in two points. contribution 0.78 0.83 0.11 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.71 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Taylor expansions of analytic functions are considered with respect to two points. Cauchy-type formulas are given for coefficients and remainders in the expansions, and the regions of convergence are indicated. It is explained how these expansions can be used in deriving uniform asymptotic expansions of integrals. The method is also used for obtaining Laurent expansions in two points.

Human review
How the literature uses it

1 arXiv paper cite this in 1 sentence

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it

Uses its method or tool 1 paper

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.