Pith. Sign in

RECORD

An alternative search for the electron capture of Te-123

Nuclear Experiment · Submitted 15 Apr 2002

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim After a measuring time of 195 h no signal could be found resulting in a lower half-life limt of $T_{1/2} > 3.2 \cdot 10^{16}$ yrs (95 % CL) for this process.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDnucl-ex/0204006 (version 2)
Pith IDNGTWFXQX, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationD. Muenstermann, K. Zuber. "An alternative search for the electron capture of Te-123." arXiv:nucl-ex/0204006 (2002). https://pith.science/paper/NGTWFXQX
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,986 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.67 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.07 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.99 · compares with prior results 0.97 · mentions code or data availability 0.01.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

A search for the electron capture of Te-123 has been performed using CdZnTe detectors. After a measuring time of 195 h no signal could be found resulting in a lower half-life limt of $T_{1/2} > 3.2 \cdot 10^{16}$ yrs (95 % CL) for this process. This clearly discriminates between existing experimental results which differ by six orders of magnitude and our data are in strong favour of the result with longer half-lifes.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 A search for the electron capture of Te-123 has been performed using CdZnTe detectors. contribution 0.51 0.94 0.03 asserted 0.99
s1 After a measuring time of 195 h no signal could be found resulting in a lower half-life limt of $T_{1/2} > 3.2 \cdot 10^{16}$ yrs (95 % CL) for this process. result 1.00 0.97 0.74 asserted 1.00
s2 This clearly discriminates between existing experimental results which differ by six orders of magnitude and our data are in strong favour of the result with longer half-lifes. interpretation 1.00 0.60 0.43 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: empirical study 1.00 · evidence from observation or experiment 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

A search for the electron capture of Te-123 has been performed using CdZnTe detectors. After a measuring time of 195 h no signal could be found resulting in a lower half-life limt of $T_{1/2} > 3.2 \cdot 10^{16}$ yrs (95 % CL) for this process. This clearly discriminates between existing experimental results which differ by six orders of magnitude and our data are in strong favour of the result with longer half-lifes.

Human review

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.