Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Search for and study of eta-mesic nuclei in pA-collisions at the JINR LHE nuclotron

Nuclear Experiment · Submitted 16 Dec 2004

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim An approved experiment at the internal proton beam of the JINR nuclotron on a search for eta-mesic nuclei in the reaction pA --> np + eta(A-1) --> np + pi-p + X is briefly presented.

how it is stated · asserted 0.88 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDnucl-ex/0412036 (version 2)
Pith IDHTHEPO7R, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationA.B. Kurepin, A.I. Lebedev, A.I. L'vov, A.I. Malakhov, A.N. Livanov, A.S. Artemov, A.V. Kobushkin, D.K. Dryablov, E.I. Tamm, E.M. Leikin, E.V. Balandina, G.A. Sokol, L.A. Kondratyuk, L.M. Lazarev, L.N. Pavlyuchenko, M.Kh. Anikina, M. Morhac, N.P. Yudin, N.V. Shevchenko, P.V. Rukoyatkin, S. Gmutsa, S.N. Kuznetsov, S.S. Sidorin, S.V. Afanasev, S. Wycech, V.A. Baskov, V.A. Krasnov, V.B. Belyaev, V.I. Ivanov, V.P. Pavlyuchenko, V.V. Polyansky, V.Yu. Grishina, Yu.N. Uzikov, Yu.S. Anisimov. "Search for and study of eta-mesic nuclei in pA-collisions at the JINR LHE nuclotron." arXiv:nucl-ex/0412036 (2004). https://pith.science/paper/HTHEPO7R
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 1,675 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.10 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.03 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.03 · compares with prior results 0.03 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

An approved experiment at the internal proton beam of the JINR nuclotron on a search for eta-mesic nuclei in the reaction pA --> np + eta(A-1) --> np + pi-p + X is briefly presented.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 An approved experiment at the internal proton beam of the JINR nuclotron on a search for eta-mesic nuclei in the reaction pA --> np + eta(A-1) --> np + pi-p + X is briefly presented. contribution 0.71 0.42 0.08 asserted 0.88

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: position or commentary 0.56 · evidence from observation or experiment 0.95.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

An approved experiment at the internal proton beam of the JINR nuclotron on a search for eta-mesic nuclei in the reaction pA --> np + eta(A-1) --> np + pi-p + X is briefly presented.

Human review
How the literature uses it

9 arXiv papers cite this in 13 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 6 sentences without a confident label

Cites it as background 6 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.