Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Kaon photoproduction in a multipole approach

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv nucl-th/0609077 v1 pith:6UEXESUX submitted 2006-09-28 nucl-th hep-ph

classification nucl-thhep-ph
keywords dataclassaphirlepsdifferentresonanceresonancesresults
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The recently published experimental data on K+Lambda photoproduction by the SAPHIR, CLAS, and LEPS collaborations are analyzed by means of a multipole approach. For this purpose the background amplitudes are constructed from appropriate Feynman diagrams in a gauge-invariant and crossing-symmetric fashion. The results of our calculation emphasize the lack of mutual consistency between the SAPHIR and CLAS data previously found by several independent research groups, whereas the LEPS data are found to be more consistent with those of CLAS. The use of SAPHIR and CLAS data, individually or simultaneously, leads to quite different resonance parameters which, therefore, could lead to different conclusions on ``missing resonances''. Fitting to the SAPHIR and LEPS data simultaneously indicates that the S_{11}(1650), P_{13}(1720), D_{13}(1700), D_{13}(2080), F_{15}(1680), and F_{15}(2000) resonances are required, while fitting to the combination of CLAS and LEPS data leads alternatively to the P_{13}(1900), D_{13}(2080), D_{15}(1675), F_{15}(1680), and F_{17}(1990) resonances. Although yielding different results in most cases, both SAPHIR and CLAS data indicate that the second peak in the cross sections at W = 1900 MeV originates from the D_{13}(2080) resonance with a mass between 1911 - 1936 MeV. Furthermore, in contrast to the results of currently available models and the Table of Particle Properties, both data sets do not exhibit the need for a P_{11}(1710) resonance. The few data points available for target asymmetry can not be described by the models proposed in the present work.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. New Isobar Models for $K^+\Lambda$ Electroproduction

    hep-ph 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Two isobar models with high-spin baryon resonances and modified electromagnetic form factors fit CLAS K+Lambda electroproduction data with chi-square per point of 2.16.

Pith tools