pith. sign in

arxiv: nucl-th/9405027 · v1 · submitted 1994-05-24 · ⚛️ nucl-th

Toward a Consistent Description of the PNC Experiments in A=18-21 Nuclei

classification ⚛️ nucl-th
keywords contributionhbarisovectormatrixomegadiscrepancyelementsisoscalar
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

The experimental PNC results in $^{18}$F, $^{19}$F, $^{21}$Ne and the current theoretical analysis show a discrepancy . If one interprets the small limit of the experimentally extracted PNC matrix element for $^{21}$Ne as a destructive interference between the isoscalar and the isovector contribution, then it is difficult to understand why the isovector contribution in $^{18}$F is so small while the isoscalar + isovector contribution in $^{19}$F is relatively large. In order to understand the origin of this discrepancy a comparison of the calculated PNC matrix elements was performed. It is shown that the $^{18}$F and $^{21}$Ne matrix elements contain important contributions from 3$\hbar \omega$ and 4$\hbar \omega$ configuration and that the (0+1)$\hbar \omega$ calculations give distorted results.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.