Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Maximum pull out force on DNA hybrids

Biological Physics · Submitted 3 Oct 2001

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim This leads to a rupture force, increasing linearly with length, and saturating for large lengths.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDphysics/0110011 (version 1)
Pith IDHJJP46DA, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationPierre-Gilles de Gennes. "Maximum pull out force on DNA hybrids." arXiv:physics/0110011 (2001). https://pith.science/paper/HJJP46DA
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,108 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.19 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.02 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.16 · compares with prior results 0.04 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We discuss theoretically the force F between two colloidal particles, each of them carrying one single strand DNA. The two strands are complementary only on a finite sequence of consecutive base pairs. We define an adjustment length (a few base pairs): in the adjustment regions near both ends of the paired region, the tension is still mainly on one single strand. But in the central part, the two backbones are equally loaded. This leads to a rupture force, increasing linearly with length, and saturating for large lengths.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We discuss theoretically the force F between two colloidal particles, each of them carrying one single strand DNA. contribution 0.94 0.78 0.04 asserted 0.75
s1 The two strands are complementary only on a finite sequence of consecutive base pairs. background 0.62 0.26 0.03 asserted 0.98
s2 We define an adjustment length (a few base pairs): in the adjustment regions near both ends of the paired region, the tension is still mainly on one single strand. contribution 0.49 0.74 0.05 asserted 1.00
s3 But in the central part, the two backbones are equally loaded. result 0.77 0.77 0.07 asserted 1.00
s4 This leads to a rupture force, increasing linearly with length, and saturating for large lengths. result 1.00 0.84 0.82 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.79.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We discuss theoretically the force F between two colloidal particles, each of them carrying one single strand DNA. The two strands are complementary only on a finite sequence of consecutive base pairs. We define an adjustment length (a few base pairs): in the adjustment regions near both ends of the paired region, the tension is still mainly on one single strand. But in the central part, the two backbones are equally loaded. This leads to a rupture force, increasing linearly with length, and saturating for large lengths.

Human review

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.