Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Analytical study of the effect of recombination on evolution via DNA shuffling

Biological Physics · Submitted 28 Mar 2003

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim The simplicity of the model allows us to obtain a full analytical treatment of both its dynamical and equilibrium properties, for the case of an infinite population.

how it is stated · asserted 0.99 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDphysics/0303120 (version 1)
Pith IDBTALAM6B, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationDavid A. Kessler, Herbert Levine, Terence Hwa, Weiqun Peng. "Analytical study of the effect of recombination on evolution via DNA shuffling." arXiv:physics/0303120 (2003). https://pith.science/paper/BTALAM6B
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 3,487 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.64 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.04 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.04 · compares with prior results 0.06 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We investigate a multi-locus evolutionary model which is based on the DNA shuffling protocol widely applied in \textit{in vitro} directed evolution. This model incorporates selection, recombination and point mutations. The simplicity of the model allows us to obtain a full analytical treatment of both its dynamical and equilibrium properties, for the case of an infinite population. We also briefly discuss finite population size corrections.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We investigate a multi-locus evolutionary model which is based on the DNA shuffling protocol widely applied in \textit{in vitro} directed evolution. contribution 0.81 0.83 0.04 asserted 0.98
s1 This model incorporates selection, recombination and point mutations. method 0.96 0.42 0.03 asserted 1.00
s2 The simplicity of the model allows us to obtain a full analytical treatment of both its dynamical and equilibrium properties, for the case of an infinite population. contribution 0.65 0.92 0.11 asserted 0.99
s3 We also briefly discuss finite population size corrections. contribution 0.62 0.78 0.03 asserted 0.57

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We investigate a multi-locus evolutionary model which is based on the DNA shuffling protocol widely applied in \textit{in vitro} directed evolution. This model incorporates selection, recombination and point mutations. The simplicity of the model allows us to obtain a full analytical treatment of both its dynamical and equilibrium properties, for the case of an infinite population. We also briefly discuss finite population size corrections.

Human review

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.