RECORD
Investigating Auto-correlation of Scattered Light of Mixed Particles
Chemical Physics · Submitted 27 Apr 2006
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim The nonexponentiality of $g^{(1)}(\tau)$ is not only determined by the particle size distribution and scattering angle but also greatly influenced by the relationship between the concentrations, mass densities and the values that the refractive index of the material expands as a function of the concentration of the two kinds of particles.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
In this work, the normalized time auto-correlation function of the electric field of the light $g^{(1)}(\tau)$ that is scattered by the two kinds of particles in dispersion is investigated. The results show that the logarithm of $g^{(1)}(\tau)$ can be consistent with a line and many reasons can cause the deviations between an exponentiality and plots of $g^{(1)}(\tau)$ as a function of delay time $\tau$. The nonexponentiality of $g^{(1)}(\tau)$ is not only determined by the particle size distribution and scattering angle but also greatly influenced by the relationship between the concentrations, mass densities and the values that the refractive index of the material expands as a function of the concentration of the two kinds of particles.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | In this work, the normalized time auto-correlation function of the electric field of the light $g^{(1)}(\tau)$ that is scattered by the two kinds of particles in dispersion is investigated. | contribution 1.00 | 0.90 | 0.05 | asserted 0.91 |
| s1 | The results show that the logarithm of $g^{(1)}(\tau)$ can be consistent with a line and many reasons can cause the deviations between an exponentiality and plots of $g^{(1)}(\tau)$ as a function of delay time $\tau$. | result 0.92 | 0.90 | 0.28 | hedged possibility 0.56 |
| s2 | The nonexponentiality of $g^{(1)}(\tau)$ is not only determined by the particle size distribution and scattering angle but also greatly influenced by the relationship between the concentrations, mass densities and the values that the refractive index of the material expands as a function of the concentration of the two kinds of particles. | result 0.61 | 0.73 | 0.68 | asserted 1.00 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v1
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
In this work, the normalized time auto-correlation function of the electric field of the light $g^{(1)}(\tau)$ that is scattered by the two kinds of particles in dispersion is investigated. The results show that the logarithm of $g^{(1)}(\tau)$ can be consistent with a line and many reasons can cause the deviations between an exponentiality and plots of $g^{(1)}(\tau)$ as a function of delay time $\tau$. The nonexponentiality of $g^{(1)}(\tau)$ is not only determined by the particle size distribution and scattering angle but also greatly influenced by the relationship between the concentrations, mass densities and the values that the refractive index of the material expands as a function of the concentration of the two kinds of particles.
Human review
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.