REVIEW 2 cited by
A more exact solution for incorporating multiplicative systematic uncertainties in branching ratio limits
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
A more exact solution for incorporating multiplicative systematic uncertainties in branching ratio limits
read the original abstract
A method to include multiplicative systematic uncertainties into branching ratio limits was proposed by M. Convery. That solution used approximations which are not necessarily valid. This note provides a solution without approximations and compares the results.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Search for sub-GeV dark particles in $\eta\to\pi^0+\rm{invisible}$ decay
No signal found in first search for eta to pi0 plus invisible dark scalar decay, setting branching fraction limits of (1.8-5.5)x10^-5 at 90% CL and improving DM-nucleon cross section bounds by ~5 orders of magnitude.
-
Search for the charmonium semi-leptonic weak decay $J/\psi\rightarrow D_s^-e^+\nu_e+c.c.$
No significant signal observed for J/ψ → D_s^- e^+ ν_e + c.c., setting branching fraction upper limit < 9.9 × 10^{-8} at 90% CL and improving prior constraints by an order of magnitude.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.