Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Frequency control in synchronized networks of inhibitory neurons

Neurons and Cognition · Submitted 20 Mar 1998

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim These results imply that for mildly heterogeneous networks, the existence of a coherent rhythm implies a linear dependence of the network period on synaptic decay time, and a much weaker dependence on the drive to the cells.

how it is stated · asserted 0.88 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDq-bio/0309025 (version 1)
Pith IDPKYOSGYV, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationCarson C. Chow, Jason Ritt, John A. White, Nancy Kopell. "Frequency control in synchronized networks of inhibitory neurons." arXiv:q-bio/0309025 (1998). https://pith.science/paper/PKYOSGYV
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 6,148 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.53 · human participants 0.05 · controlled comparison 0.05 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.10 · compares with prior results 0.92 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We analyze the control of frequency for a synchronized inhibitory neuronal network. The analysis is done for a reduced membrane model with a biophysically-based synaptic influence. We argue that such a reduced model can quantitatively capture the frequency behavior of a larger class of neuronal models. We show that in different parameter regimes, the network frequency depends in different ways on the intrinsic and synaptic time constants. Only in one portion of the parameter space, called `phasic', is the network period proportional to the synaptic decay time. These results are discussed in connection with previous work of the authors, which showed that for mildly heterogeneous networks, the synchrony breaks down, but coherence is preserved much more for systems in the phasic regime than in the other regimes. These results imply that for mildly heterogeneous networks, the existence of a coherent rhythm implies a linear dependence of the network period on synaptic decay time, and a much weaker dependence on the drive to the cells. We give experimental evidence for this conclusion.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We analyze the control of frequency for a synchronized inhibitory neuronal network. contribution 0.97 0.92 0.05 asserted 0.77
s1 The analysis is done for a reduced membrane model with a biophysically-based synaptic influence. method 0.99 0.89 0.02 asserted 0.98
s2 We argue that such a reduced model can quantitatively capture the frequency behavior of a larger class of neuronal models. contribution 0.45 0.68 0.10 hedged possibility 0.65
s3 We show that in different parameter regimes, the network frequency depends in different ways on the intrinsic and synaptic time constants. result 0.99 0.94 0.12 asserted 1.00
s4 Only in one portion of the parameter space, called `phasic', is the network period proportional to the synaptic decay time. result 1.00 0.91 0.18 asserted 1.00
s5 These results are discussed in connection with previous work of the authors, which showed that for mildly heterogeneous networks, the synchrony breaks down, but coherence is preserved much more for systems in the phasic regime than in the other regimes. background 0.53 0.34 0.12 asserted 0.98
s6 These results imply that for mildly heterogeneous networks, the existence of a coherent rhythm implies a linear dependence of the network period on synaptic decay time, and a much weaker dependence on the drive to the cells. interpretation 1.00 0.79 0.65 asserted 0.88
s7 We give experimental evidence for this conclusion. contribution 0.52 0.88 0.09 asserted 0.99

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.98 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.62.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We analyze the control of frequency for a synchronized inhibitory neuronal network. The analysis is done for a reduced membrane model with a biophysically-based synaptic influence. We argue that such a reduced model can quantitatively capture the frequency behavior of a larger class of neuronal models. We show that in different parameter regimes, the network frequency depends in different ways on the intrinsic and synaptic time constants. Only in one portion of the parameter space, called `phasic', is the network period proportional to the synaptic decay time. These results are discussed in connection with previous work of the authors, which showed that for mildly heterogeneous networks, the synchrony breaks down, but coherence is preserved much more for systems in the phasic regime than in the other regimes. These results imply that for mildly heterogeneous networks, the existence of a coherent rhythm implies a linear dependence of the network period on synaptic decay time, and a much weaker dependence on the drive to the cells. We give experimental evidence for this conclusion.

Human review

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.