Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Classical representations for quantum-like systems through an axiomatics for context dependence

Quantum Physics · Submitted 14 Aug 2000

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We show that in this way we always find classical representations (hidden measurement representations) for general non-classical entities (e.g. quantum entities).

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDquant-ph/0008061 (version 1)
Pith IDHO75BHKF, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationBob Coecke. "Classical representations for quantum-like systems through an axiomatics for context dependence." arXiv:quant-ph/0008061 (2000). https://pith.science/paper/HO75BHKF
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,449 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.09 · states limitation 0.08 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.02 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.28 · compares with prior results 0.09 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We introduce a definition for a 'hidden measurement system', i.e., a physical entity for which there exist: (i) 'a set of non-contextual states of the entity under study' and (ii) 'a set of states of the measurement context', and which are such that all uncertainties are due to a lack of knowledge on the actual state of the measurement context. First we identify an explicit criterion that enables us to verify whether a given hidden measurement system is a representation of a given couple $\Si,{\cal E}$ consisting of a set of states $\Si$ and a set of measurements ${\cal E}$ ($=$ measurement system). Then we prove for every measurement system that there exists at least one representation as a hidden measurement system with $[0,1]$ as set of states of the measurement context. Thus, we can apply this definition of a hidden measurement system to impose an axiomatics for context dependence. We show that in this way we always find classical representations (hidden measurement representations) for general non-classical entities (e.g. quantum entities).

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We introduce a definition for a 'hidden measurement system', i.e., a physical entity for which there exist: (i) 'a set of non-contextual states of the entity under study' and (ii) 'a set of states of the measurement context', and which are such that all uncertainties are due to a lack of knowledge on the actual state of the measurement context. contribution 0.97 0.71 0.07 asserted 0.99
s1 First we identify an explicit criterion that enables us to verify whether a given hidden measurement system is a representation of a given couple $\Si,{\cal E}$ consisting of a set of states $\Si$ and a set of measurements ${\cal E}$ ($=$ measurement system). contribution 0.47 0.92 0.05 asserted 1.00
s2 Then we prove for every measurement system that there exists at least one representation as a hidden measurement system with $[0,1]$ as set of states of the measurement context. result 0.98 0.94 0.20 asserted 1.00
s3 Thus, we can apply this definition of a hidden measurement system to impose an axiomatics for context dependence. contribution 0.50 0.84 0.10 asserted 0.82
s4 We show that in this way we always find classical representations (hidden measurement representations) for general non-classical entities (e.g. quantum entities). result 0.90 0.93 0.81 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.97 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We introduce a definition for a 'hidden measurement system', i.e., a physical entity for which there exist: (i) 'a set of non-contextual states of the entity under study' and (ii) 'a set of states of the measurement context', and which are such that all uncertainties are due to a lack of knowledge on the actual state of the measurement context. First we identify an explicit criterion that enables us to verify whether a given hidden measurement system is a representation of a given couple $\Si,{\cal E}$ consisting of a set of states $\Si$ and a set of measurements ${\cal E}$ ($=$ measurement system). Then we prove for every measurement system that there exists at least one representation as a hidden measurement system with $[0,1]$ as set of states of the measurement context. Thus, we can apply this definition of a hidden measurement system to impose an axiomatics for context dependence. We show that in this way we always find classical representations (hidden measurement representations) for general non-classical entities (e.g. quantum entities).

Human review

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.