Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Note on Extended Coherent Operators and Some Basic Properties

PaperPDF from arXiv

data files

Paper breakdownThe authors' claims, conditions and measurements, as JSON Signed receiptProof this review has not been altered
X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit Hacker News
Kazuyuki Fujii

Quantum Physics · Submitted 28 Sep 2000

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim In this letter we extend coherent operators and study some basic properties (the disentangling formula, resolution of unity, commutation relation, etc).

how it is stated · asserted 0.98 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDquant-ph/0009116 (version 2)
Pith IDEQ3LYD4Z, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationKazuyuki Fujii. "Note on Extended Coherent Operators and Some Basic Properties." arXiv:quant-ph/0009116 (2000). https://pith.science/paper/EQ3LYD4Z
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,831 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.06 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.01 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.03 · compares with prior results 0.10 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

This is a continuation of the paper (quant-ph/0009012). In this letter we extend coherent operators and study some basic properties (the disentangling formula, resolution of unity, commutation relation, etc). We also propose a perspective of our work.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 This is a continuation of the paper (quant-ph/0009012). background 1.00 0.13 0.02 asserted 0.99
s1 In this letter we extend coherent operators and study some basic properties (the disentangling formula, resolution of unity, commutation relation, etc). contribution 1.00 0.93 0.30 asserted 0.98
s2 We also propose a perspective of our work. future work 0.68 0.64 0.08 asserted 0.59

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.98 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.99.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

This is a continuation of the paper (quant-ph/0009012). In this letter we extend coherent operators and study some basic properties (the disentangling formula, resolution of unity, commutation relation, etc). We also propose a perspective of our work.

Human review

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.