Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Using Electrons on Liquid Helium for Quantum Computing

Quantum Physics · Submitted 5 Nov 2001

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim This system is, in principle, capable of 100,000 operations in a decoherence time.

how it is stated · hedged possibility 0.86 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDquant-ph/0111029 (version 1)
Pith ID7RMVFOSG, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationA.J. Dahm, I. Karakurt, J.M. Goodkind, S. Pilla. "Using Electrons on Liquid Helium for Quantum Computing." arXiv:quant-ph/0111029 (2001). https://pith.science/paper/7RMVFOSG
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 3,541 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.33 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.02 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.94 · compares with prior results 0.05 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We describe a quantum computer based on electrons supported by a helium film and localized laterally by small electrodes just under the helium surface. Each qubit is made of combinations of the ground and first excited state of an electron trapped in the image potential well at the surface. Mechanisms for preparing the initial state of the qubit, operations with the qubits, and a proposed readout are described. This system is, in principle, capable of 100,000 operations in a decoherence time.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We describe a quantum computer based on electrons supported by a helium film and localized laterally by small electrodes just under the helium surface. contribution 0.91 0.52 0.10 asserted 0.97
s1 Each qubit is made of combinations of the ground and first excited state of an electron trapped in the image potential well at the surface. method 0.76 0.40 0.07 asserted 1.00
s2 Mechanisms for preparing the initial state of the qubit, operations with the qubits, and a proposed readout are described. contribution 0.51 0.62 0.07 asserted 0.93
s3 This system is, in principle, capable of 100,000 operations in a decoherence time. result 0.80 0.50 0.40 hedged possibility 0.86

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 0.88 · evidence from argument 0.95.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We describe a quantum computer based on electrons supported by a helium film and localized laterally by small electrodes just under the helium surface. Each qubit is made of combinations of the ground and first excited state of an electron trapped in the image potential well at the surface. Mechanisms for preparing the initial state of the qubit, operations with the qubits, and a proposed readout are described. This system is, in principle, capable of 100,000 operations in a decoherence time.

Human review

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.