Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Application of quantum inequalities to quantum optics

Quantum Physics · Submitted 6 Mar 2002

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim The bigger the level of fluctuations-suppression the shorter its duration.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDquant-ph/0203027 (version 3)
Pith IDLMTV3LND, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationP. Marecki. "Application of quantum inequalities to quantum optics." arXiv:quant-ph/0203027 (2002). https://pith.science/paper/LMTV3LND
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 3,532 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.44 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.03 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.98 · compares with prior results 0.07 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v3. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We establish a connection between quantum inequalities (known from quantum field theory on curved spacetimes) and the degree of squeezing in quantum-optical experiments. We prove an inequality which binds the reduction of the electric-field fluctuations to their duration. The bigger the level of fluctuations-suppression the shorter its duration. As an example of the application of this inequality in the case of squeezed light whose phase is controlled with 1% accuracy we derive a limit of -15dB on the allowed degree of squeezing.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We establish a connection between quantum inequalities (known from quantum field theory on curved spacetimes) and the degree of squeezing in quantum-optical experiments. contribution 0.99 0.92 0.26 asserted 1.00
s1 We prove an inequality which binds the reduction of the electric-field fluctuations to their duration. result 0.52 0.95 0.51 asserted 1.00
s2 The bigger the level of fluctuations-suppression the shorter its duration. result 0.71 0.79 0.57 asserted 1.00
s3 As an example of the application of this inequality in the case of squeezed light whose phase is controlled with 1% accuracy we derive a limit of -15dB on the allowed degree of squeezing. result 0.99 0.94 0.20 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v3
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We establish a connection between quantum inequalities (known from quantum field theory on curved spacetimes) and the degree of squeezing in quantum-optical experiments. We prove an inequality which binds the reduction of the electric-field fluctuations to their duration. The bigger the level of fluctuations-suppression the shorter its duration. As an example of the application of this inequality in the case of squeezed light whose phase is controlled with 1% accuracy we derive a limit of -15dB on the allowed degree of squeezing.

Human review

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.