Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Quantum Computing in the Presence of Detected Spontaneous Emission

Quantum Physics · Submitted 20 Jan 2003

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Universal fault-tolerant quantum computation is shown to be possible in this scheme using Hamiltonians relevant to a range of promising proposals for the physical implementation of quantum computers.

how it is stated · asserted 0.75 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDquant-ph/0301105 (version 4)
Pith IDSVMNHMYC, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationD.A. Lidar, K. Khodjasteh. "Quantum Computing in the Presence of Detected Spontaneous Emission." arXiv:quant-ph/0301105 (2003). https://pith.science/paper/SVMNHMYC
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,936 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.10 · states limitation 0.09 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.03 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.59 · compares with prior results 0.07 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v4. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

A new method for quantum computation in the presence of detected spontaneous emission is proposed. The method combines strong and fast (dynamical decoupling) pulses and a quantum error correcting code that encodes $n$ logical qubits into only $n+1$ physical qubits. Universal fault-tolerant quantum computation is shown to be possible in this scheme using Hamiltonians relevant to a range of promising proposals for the physical implementation of quantum computers.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 A new method for quantum computation in the presence of detected spontaneous emission is proposed. contribution 1.00 0.73 0.20 asserted 0.95
s1 The method combines strong and fast (dynamical decoupling) pulses and a quantum error correcting code that encodes $n$ logical qubits into only $n+1$ physical qubits. method 0.91 0.65 0.10 asserted 0.99
s2 Universal fault-tolerant quantum computation is shown to be possible in this scheme using Hamiltonians relevant to a range of promising proposals for the physical implementation of quantum computers. result 0.98 0.85 0.76 asserted 0.75

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 0.99 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.95.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v4
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

A new method for quantum computation in the presence of detected spontaneous emission is proposed. The method combines strong and fast (dynamical decoupling) pulses and a quantum error correcting code that encodes $n$ logical qubits into only $n+1$ physical qubits. Universal fault-tolerant quantum computation is shown to be possible in this scheme using Hamiltonians relevant to a range of promising proposals for the physical implementation of quantum computers.

Human review

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.