Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Schrodinger cats and their power for quantum information processing

Quantum Physics · Submitted 24 Dec 2003

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Such a toolbox is a powerful collection of primitives for quantum information processing tasks.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDquant-ph/0312194 (version 1)
Pith IDLDUOB47J, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationA. Gilchrist, G. J. Milburn, Kae Nemoto, Samuel. L. Braunstein, S. Glancy, T. C. Ralph, W. J. Munro. "Schrodinger cats and their power for quantum information processing." arXiv:quant-ph/0312194 (2003). https://pith.science/paper/LDUOB47J
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,088 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.05 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.03 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.52 · compares with prior results 0.07 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We outline a toolbox comprised of passive optical elements, single photon detection and superpositions of coherent states (Schrodinger cat states). Such a toolbox is a powerful collection of primitives for quantum information processing tasks. We illustrate its use by outlining a proposal for universal quantum computation. We utilize this toolbox for quantum metrology applications, for instance weak force measurements and precise phase estimation. We show in both these cases that a sensitivity at the Heisenberg limit is achievable.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We outline a toolbox comprised of passive optical elements, single photon detection and superpositions of coherent states (Schrodinger cat states). contribution 0.80 0.43 0.06 asserted 0.94
s1 Such a toolbox is a powerful collection of primitives for quantum information processing tasks. interpretation 0.84 0.18 0.32 asserted 1.00
s2 We illustrate its use by outlining a proposal for universal quantum computation. contribution 0.98 0.76 0.17 asserted 0.85
s3 We utilize this toolbox for quantum metrology applications, for instance weak force measurements and precise phase estimation. contribution 0.95 0.75 0.07 asserted 0.96
s4 We show in both these cases that a sensitivity at the Heisenberg limit is achievable. result 1.00 0.86 0.34 asserted 0.95

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 0.99 · evidence from argument 0.78.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We outline a toolbox comprised of passive optical elements, single photon detection and superpositions of coherent states (Schrodinger cat states). Such a toolbox is a powerful collection of primitives for quantum information processing tasks. We illustrate its use by outlining a proposal for universal quantum computation. We utilize this toolbox for quantum metrology applications, for instance weak force measurements and precise phase estimation. We show in both these cases that a sensitivity at the Heisenberg limit is achievable.

Human review
How later papers used it

50 later papers cite it

Evidence: some. 49 of the citing papers share no author with it, and 2 of those carry a confident label from Pith's citation classifier.

Pith read 6 of the 63 citing sentences, choosing only those whose citation markers point at this paper alone, and wrote the paraphrases from them. The summary, the counts, the evidence level, the links and the quotes come from code; the summary counts the papers listed below. A later paper is listed under a label when Pith's citation classifier gives one of its sentences that label at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), Pith's reading finds that the citing paper itself did it, and a second check confirms the paraphrase against the sentence. This section lists uses only. It does not list criticism or disagreement, so their absence here says nothing about how the paper has been received. Papers that share an author with this one are listed apart, under "By the same authors". A quote is the citing authors' own sentence, shown when their paper's licence is CC BY, CC BY-SA or CC0. JSON

Compares with it 1 of 2 papers with this label
How the literature uses it

1 arXiv paper cite this in 1 sentence

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.