pith. sign in

arxiv: quant-ph/0509092 · v1 · submitted 2005-09-13 · 🪐 quant-ph

Reply to: 'Reply to: "Comment on: `How much security does Y-00 protocol provide us?` " '

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords y-00ciphersecurityclaimequivalentrandomreplyadditional
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Nishioka et al claim in [1], elaborating on their earlier paper [2], that the direct encryption scheme called Y-00 [3,4] is equivalent to a classical non-random additive stream cipher, and thus offers no more security than the latter. In this paper, we show that this claim is false and that Y-00 may be considered equivalent to a \emph{random} cipher. We explain why a random cipher provides additional security compared to its nonrandom counterpart. Some criticisms in [1] on the use of Y-00 for key generation are also briefly responded to.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.