Pith. Sign in

REVIEW

Geometric phase in weak measurements

Quantum Physics · Submitted 6 Apr 2006 · 16 references

Pith's verdict: Sjöqvist's core identity is right and the weak-measurement route to Pancharatnam phases is a genuine new application, but the paper's main formula (19) has a quadrant ambiguity that must be fixed before publication.

T0 · AI review

How this review was made: An AI referee (deepseek-v4-flash) read the paper on August 28, 2026 and answered a fixed list of questions about it. T0 is the starting level every paper gets. The levels describe how deeply Pith has checked the paper, never the authors.

  1. T0 AI review An AI read the paper and answered a fixed list of questions.
  2. T1 Audit Automatic checks that the references and files the paper relies on exist and match.
  3. T2 Compute The paper's code or calculations re-run with the same results.
  4. T3 Formal statement The claims written out in a formal math language a computer can read.
  5. T4 Proof Those claims proved, and the proof checked by computer.

How Pith checks papers →

· 2 major objections · 3 minor · Ask about this paper · The compiled record · Read the full review →
Challenge this review Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDquant-ph/0604042 (version 2)
Pith IDNH2RWEVU, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationErik Sj\"oqvist. "Geometric phase in weak measurements." arXiv:quant-ph/0604042 (2006). https://pith.science/paper/NH2RWEVU
Cite this reviewBibTeX for Pith's review of this paper
Claim paper

Why Pith says this

Highlight any text to comment on it.

Referee report
The paper

The paper claims

The geometric phase of a quantum triangle is exactly the phase of a weak value.

The reading

The paper claims that Pancharatnam's geometric phase for a triangle of quantum states is exactly the argument of a weak value: with a system prepared in $|A\rangle$, a weak measurement of the projector onto $|B\rangle$, and post-selection in $|C\rangle$, the phase of $\langle C|B\rangle\langle B|A\rangle/\langle C|A\rangle$ equals $\Delta(A,B,C) = \arg\langle A|C\rangle\langle C|B\rangle\langle B|A\rangle$. This matters because the weak value's phase can be read from the pointer shifts of the measuring device, giving $\Delta(A,B,C) = -\arctan\left(\frac{\hbar}{\sigma^2}\frac{\delta q}{\delta p}\right)$ without the phase calibration required by interferometric and polarimetric setups. The paper further argues that any polygon-shaped sequence of states decomposes into such triangles, so the same procedure measures geometric phase along arbitrary paths. A spin-1/2 magnetic-deflection variant makes the claim concrete: the measured phase is half the solid angle of the geodesic triangle on the Bloch sphere.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the weak value $P_w^B(A,C)$ of a projector between pre- and post-selection, a complex number defined as the ratio $\langle C|B\rangle\langle B|A\rangle/\langle C|A\rangle$ in the limit of weak coupling. Its argument, by the multiplication-and-division trick with $\langle A|C\rangle$, is exactly the Pancharatnam triangle phase $\Delta(A,B,C) = \arg\langle A|C\rangle\langle C|B\rangle\langle B|A\rangle$ in projective Hilbert space, the space of rays of quantum states. The weak-measurement apparatus turns this phase into a real observable: for a Gaussian pointer of width $\sigma$ and measurement strength $\kappa$, the post-selected pointer position shift and momentum kick are proportional to the imaginary and real parts of the weak value, so their ratio determines $\Delta$ through an arctangent. This machinery converts a purely algebraic phase identity into a measurable quantity.

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is the identity $\arg P_w^B(A,C) = \Delta(A,B,C)$, where $P_w^B(A,C)=\langle C|B\rangle\langle B|A\rangle/\langle C|A\rangle$ is the weak value of the projector onto $B$ in an ensemble pre-selected in $|A\rangle$ and post-selected in $|C\rangle$, and $\Delta(A,B,C)=\arg\langle A|C\rangle\langle C|B\rangle\langle B|A\rangle$ is the Pancharatnam geometric phase of the geodesic triangle $A,B,C$. Multiplying numerator and denominator of the weak value by $\langle A|C\rangle$ leaves a positive real denominator, so the argument of the weak value is exactly the triangle phase. Combining this identity with the weak-measurement pointer shifts $\delta q = \kappa\sigma^2\,\mathrm{Im}\,P_w^B$ and $\delta p = -\hbar\kappa\,\mathrm{Re}\,P_w^B$ gives the main result $\Delta(A,B,C) = -\arctan\left(\frac{\hbar}{\sigma^2}\frac{\delta q}{\delta p}\right)$, with no need for a phase relation between $|A\rangle$ and $|C\rangle$. The paper also shows that the geometric phase of any discrete path $A_1,\dots,A_n$ is a sum of such triangle phases, and that the weak value diverges exactly when the post-selected state becomes orthogonal to the pre-selected state, which is precisely where the geometric phase is undefined.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the system-pointer coupling is so weak that only the first-order term survives, and that the pre- and post-selected states have nonzero overlap; if either premise fails, Eq. (19) does not follow from the measurement, even though the algebraic identity behind it remains true.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The geometric phase of any discrete path $A_1,\dots,A_n$ can be assembled from weak-measurement phases by summing the arguments of weak values of projectors onto intermediate states.
  • Geometric phase measurements no longer require a calibrated reference phase, because only pointer displacements $\delta q$ and $\delta p$ enter the final formula.
  • The nontransitivity of relative phase becomes testable: choose three states with $\phi_{CB}=\phi_{AC}=0$ and $\phi_{BA}\neq0$, and the weak-value argument directly reveals the excess phase around the triangle.
  • In the qubit or photon-polarization case, the measured phase is half the solid angle of the spherical triangle on the Bloch sphere, extractable from pointer shifts alone.
  • Because the formula works for any polygon, the scheme extends to continuous paths by taking small increments, matching the standard continuous definition of geometric phase.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because Eq. (18) is purely algebraic, it should hold for any pair of non-orthogonal pre- and post-selected states even when the weak-coupling approximation fails; what fails is only the linear-response formula Eq. (19), so varying $\kappa$ could map the transition from geometric-phase readout to higher-order corrections.
  • The same ratio-of-amplitudes structure appears in other linear response coefficients, so Pancharatnam-type phases may show up wherever a transition amplitude is normalized by another amplitude, not only in optical or spin measurements.
  • A direct experimental comparison of Eq. (19) with standard interferometric measurements of $\Delta$ on the same triangle would isolate whether the pointer-shift readout introduces any systematic phase offset.
Original abstract

Pancharatnam's geometric phase is associated with the phase of a complex-valued weak value arising in a certain type of weak measurement in pre- and post-selected quantum ensembles. This makes it possible to test the nontransitive nature of the relative phase in quantum mechanics, in the weak measurement scenario.

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged, kept beside the review and separate from it. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,269 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.06 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.02 · randomized assignment 0.02 · states quantitative result 0.03 · compares with prior results 0.06 · mentions code or data availability 0.01.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Pancharatnam's geometric phase is associated with the phase of a complex-valued weak value arising in a certain type of weak measurement in pre- and post-selected quantum ensembles. This makes it possible to test the nontransitive nature of the relative phase in quantum mechanics, in the weak measurement scenario.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Pancharatnam's geometric phase is associated with the phase of a complex-valued weak value arising in a certain type of weak measurement in pre- and post-selected quantum ensembles. background 0.91 0.11 0.25 asserted 1.00
s1 This makes it possible to test the nontransitive nature of the relative phase in quantum mechanics, in the weak measurement scenario. interpretation 0.94 0.21 0.37 hedged possibility 0.72

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.87 · evidence from argument 0.80.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

Figures
Figure 1. FIG. 1: Bloch sphere representation of weak spin measure

Figures reproduced from arXiv:quant-ph/0604042 by the authors.

References

Discussion

Disagree with the review, or know something it missed? Leave a comment, highlight any passage above to comment on it, or challenge this review formally.