Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Subsystem Codes

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv quant-ph/0610153 v1 pith:OC3NAFI2 submitted 2006-10-18 quant-ph cs.ITmath.IT

classification quant-phcs.ITmath.IT
keywords codessubsystemboundsderivegivequantumvariousanswer
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We investigate various aspects of operator quantum error-correcting codes or, as we prefer to call them, subsystem codes. We give various methods to derive subsystem codes from classical codes. We give a proof for the existence of subsystem codes using a counting argument similar to the quantum Gilbert-Varshamov bound. We derive linear programming bounds and other upper bounds. We answer the question whether or not there exist [[n,n-2d+2,r>0,d]]<sub>q</sub> subsystem codes. Finally, we compare stabilizer and subsystem codes with respect to the required number of syndrome qudits.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Quantum Error Correction in Adversarial Regimes

    quant-ph 2025-09 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    The paper gives a generalized Knill-Laflamme condition for quantum list-decodable codes and a pseudorandom-unitary protocol for unambiguous list decoding that is claimed to be secure against polynomial-time quantum ad...

  2. VideoEraser: Concept Erasure in Text-to-Video Diffusion Models

    cs.CV 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    A training-free, two-stage erasure method (prompt embedding adjustment plus adversarial noise guidance) is claimed to cut unwanted text-to-video output by 46%, but the submitted full text is an unrelated quantum-coding paper.

  3. Design Automation in Quantum Error Correction

    quant-ph 2025-07 conditional novelty 2.0 of 10

    A comprehensive review of automated tools and methods for designing quantum error-corrected circuits, with case studies on T-gate optimization, surface-code layout, ML decoders, and verification.

Pith tools