Pith. sign in

REVIEW

On the impossibility of a quantum sieve algorithm for graph isomorphism: unconditional results

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv quant-ph/0612089 v3 pith:27PUEYEA submitted 2006-12-12 quant-ph math.RT

On the impossibility of a quantum sieve algorithm for graph isomorphism: unconditional results

classification quant-ph math.RT
keywords quantumalgorithmgraphisomorphismstatesknownalgorithmscoset
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

It is known that any quantum algorithm for Graph Isomorphism that works within the framework of the hidden subgroup problem (HSP) must perform highly entangled measurements across \Omega(n \log n) coset states. One of the only known models for how such a measurement could be carried out efficiently is Kuperberg's algorithm for the HSP in the dihedral group, in which quantum states are adaptively combined and measured according to the decomposition of tensor products into irreducible representations. This ``quantum sieve'' starts with coset states, and works its way down towards representations whose probabilities differ depending on, for example, whether the hidden subgroup is trivial or nontrivial. In this paper we show that no such approach can produce a polynomial-time quantum algorithm for Graph Isomorphism. Specifically, we consider the natural reduction of Graph Isomorphism to the HSP over the the wreath product S_n\wr Z_2. Using a recently proved bound on the irreducible characters of S_n, we show that no algorithm in this family can solve Graph Isomorphism in less than e^{\Omega(\sqrt{n})} time, no matter what adaptive rule it uses to select and combine quantum states. In particular, algorithms of this type can offer essentially no improvement over the best known classical algorithms, which run in time e^{O(\sqrt{n \log n})}.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.