RECORD
Fundamentals of quantum mutual entropy and capacity
Quantum Physics · Submitted 12 Jun 1998
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim Therefore in this note we point out that our quantum mutual entropy generalizes others and where the m isuse occurs.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
The study of mutual entropy (information) and capacity in classica l system was extensively done after Shannon by several authors like Kolmogor ov and Gelfand. In quantum systems, there have been several definitions of t he mutual entropy for classical input and quantum output. In 1983, the autho r defined the fully quantum mechanical mutual entropy by means of the relati ve entropy of Umegaki, and he extended it to general quantum systems by the relative entropy of Araki and Uhlmann. When the author introduced the quantu m mutual entropy, he did not indicate that it contains other definitions of the mutual entropy including classical one, so that there exist several misu nderstandings for the use of the mutual entropy (information) to compute the capacity of quantum channels. Therefore in this note we point out that our quantum mutual entropy generalizes others and where the m isuse occurs.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | The study of mutual entropy (information) and capacity in classica l system was extensively done after Shannon by several authors like Kolmogor ov and Gelfand. | background 1.00 | 0.03 | 0.02 | asserted 1.00 |
| s1 | In quantum systems, there have been several definitions of t he mutual entropy for classical input and quantum output. | background 1.00 | 0.04 | 0.03 | asserted 1.00 |
| s2 | In 1983, the autho r defined the fully quantum mechanical mutual entropy by means of the relati ve entropy of Umegaki, and he extended it to general quantum systems by the relative entropy of Araki and Uhlmann. | background 0.72 | 0.64 | 0.05 | asserted 1.00 |
| s3 | When the author introduced the quantu m mutual entropy, he did not indicate that it contains other definitions of the mutual entropy including classical one, so that there exist several misu nderstandings for the use of the mutual entropy (information) to compute the capacity of quantum channels. | gap 0.94 | 0.47 | 0.10 | asserted 0.99 |
| s4 | Therefore in this note we point out that our quantum mutual entropy generalizes others and where the m isuse occurs. | contribution 1.00 | 0.83 | 0.87 | asserted 0.99 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v2
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
The study of mutual entropy (information) and capacity in classica l system was extensively done after Shannon by several authors like Kolmogor ov and Gelfand. In quantum systems, there have been several definitions of t he mutual entropy for classical input and quantum output. In 1983, the autho r defined the fully quantum mechanical mutual entropy by means of the relati ve entropy of Umegaki, and he extended it to general quantum systems by the relative entropy of Araki and Uhlmann. When the author introduced the quantu m mutual entropy, he did not indicate that it contains other definitions of the mutual entropy including classical one, so that there exist several misu nderstandings for the use of the mutual entropy (information) to compute the capacity of quantum channels. Therefore in this note we point out that our quantum mutual entropy generalizes others and where the m isuse occurs.
Human review
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.