Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Improved Precision Measurement of the Casimir Force

Quantum Physics · Submitted 16 Jun 1999

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We report an improved precision measurement of the Casimir force.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDquant-ph/9906062 (version 3)
Pith IDVHHXFBWJ, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationAnushree Roy, Chiung-Yuan Lin, U. Mohideen. "Improved Precision Measurement of the Casimir Force." arXiv:quant-ph/9906062 (1999). https://pith.science/paper/VHHXFBWJ
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,086 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.66 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.05 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.95 · compares with prior results 0.20 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v3. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We report an improved precision measurement of the Casimir force. The force is measured between a large Al coated sphere and flat plate using an Atomic Force Microscope. The primary experimental improvements include the use of smoother metal coatings, reduced noise, lower systematic errors and independent measurement of surface separations. Also the complete dielectric spectrum of the metal is used in the theory. The average statistical precision remains at the same 1% of the forces measured at the closest separation.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We report an improved precision measurement of the Casimir force. contribution 0.98 0.96 0.49 asserted 1.00
s1 The force is measured between a large Al coated sphere and flat plate using an Atomic Force Microscope. method 0.98 0.93 0.04 asserted 1.00
s2 The primary experimental improvements include the use of smoother metal coatings, reduced noise, lower systematic errors and independent measurement of surface separations. contribution 0.53 0.91 0.07 asserted 1.00
s3 Also the complete dielectric spectrum of the metal is used in the theory. method 0.65 0.69 0.04 asserted 1.00
s4 The average statistical precision remains at the same 1% of the forces measured at the closest separation. result 0.82 0.91 0.17 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: empirical study 1.00 · evidence from observation or experiment 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v3
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We report an improved precision measurement of the Casimir force. The force is measured between a large Al coated sphere and flat plate using an Atomic Force Microscope. The primary experimental improvements include the use of smoother metal coatings, reduced noise, lower systematic errors and independent measurement of surface separations. Also the complete dielectric spectrum of the metal is used in the theory. The average statistical precision remains at the same 1% of the forces measured at the closest separation.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

4 arXiv papers cite this in 4 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 2 sentences without a confident label

Cites it as background 2 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.