Pith. sign in
module module moderate

IndisputableMonolith.Masses.Verification

show as:
view Lean formalization →

Verification layer for Recognition Science mass predictions: experimental lepton anchors, RS MeV conversions, and closed equalities for electron, muon, and tau on the phi-ladder. Mass-sector auditors cite it when checking that predicted rung formulas reduce to explicit powers of phi. The module mixes parameter-free definitions with short algebraic identities and interval facts; one recorded claim is the proton binding-energy band (969, 970.4) MeV.

claimCollects RS mass predictions in MeV via the phi-ladder formula, experimental lepton masses $m_e$, $m_\mu$, $m_\tau$, predicted values $\mathrm{electron\_pred}$, $\mathrm{muon\_pred}$, $\mathrm{tau\_pred}$, and equalities identifying those predictions with explicit $\phi$-power expressions; records that the proton binding-energy prediction lies in $(969, 970.4)$ MeV.

background

Recognition Science places particle masses on a discrete phi-ladder: mass equals a fixed yardstick times $\phi^{\mathrm{rung}-8+\mathrm{gap}(Z)}$, with $\phi$ the golden ratio forced as the self-similar fixed point (T6). This module sits in the Masses domain and imports the canonical, parameter-free anchors from Masses.Anchor (Model-layer constants only; no experimental-agreement theorems), fundamental RS units from Constants, and rigorous algebraic bounds on $\phi=(1+\sqrt{5})/2$ from PhiBounds.

Sibling content defines experimental lepton masses, the RS-to-MeV conversion, and the three charged-lepton predictions, then proves they match explicit power sums in $\phi$. The module doc flags a proton binding-energy interval claim in $(969, 970.4)$ MeV as part of the same verification surface.

proof idea

Not a single theorem: a verification module. Definitions fix experimental anchors ($m_e$, $m_\mu$, $m_\tau$), the MeV conversion rs_mass_MeV, and the three lepton predictions. Equality lemmas (lepton_pred_eq_aux, electron_pred_eq, muon_pred_eq, and the power-sum helper zpow_sum3) reduce each prediction to an explicit combination of powers of $\phi$, using phi_eq_goldenRatio and the interval machinery from PhiBounds. Interval or numeric claims (including the proton binding band in the module doc) are discharged by those algebraic bounds rather than by floating-point search.

why it matters in Recognition Science

Supplies the checked lepton-side mass surface that the electroweak sector builds on. Downstream, Masses.ElectroweakMasses imports this module and predicts boson masses by the same rung mechanism (e.g. $m_Z=2\cdot\phi^{51}/10^6$ MeV at electroweak rung 1). Without the closed lepton equalities and the shared MeV conversion, those boson formulas would float free of the charged-lepton ladder. In the broader framework this is the mass-formula checkpoint on the phi-ladder (yardstick $\cdot\phi^{\mathrm{rung}-8+\mathrm{gap}(Z)}$), tying Model-layer anchors to the constants fixed by T5–T6 and the RCL.

scope and limits

used by (1)

From the project-wide theorem graph. These declarations reference this one in their body.

depends on (3)

Lean names referenced from this declaration's body.

declarations in this module (53)