pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in
theorem proved tactic proof high

proton_relative_error

show as:
view Lean formalization →

The theorem shows that the phi-ladder proton mass prediction, given by phi to the 43rd power divided by one million in MeV units, lies within 3.5 percent relative error of the experimental value 938.272 MeV. Verification authors and Recognition Science mass checks would cite this result to replace placeholder assumptions with concrete bounds. The proof obtains the prediction interval from proton_mass_bounds, rewrites the relative-error inequality via division and absolute-value rules, unfolds the definitions, and closes with linear arithmetic.

claimLet $P = 938.272$ denote the experimental proton mass in MeV and let $Q = 969.030$ denote the binding-dominated phi-ladder prediction $Q = 10^{-6} phi^{43}$. Then $|Q - P| / P < 0.035$.

background

In the Masses.Verification module, experimental PDG values are treated as imported constants rather than RS derivations. The proton_binding_pred definition supplies the concrete phi-ladder value $phi^{43}/10^6$ MeV, while m_p_exp fixes the PDG anchor at 938.272 MeV. The upstream theorem proton_mass_bounds establishes the interval (969, 970.4) MeV for this prediction, obtained by direct norm_num evaluation of the power and division. The module doc notes that the integer rung nearest the proton is 48, with the 3.3 percent overshoot attributed to non-perturbative QCD binding between rungs 47 and 48. This verification replaces the surrogate mass_ladder_assumption, which merely asserted that imported measurements satisfy the ladder bound without supplying numbers.

proof idea

The tactic proof first obtains the interval bounds via have hb := proton_mass_bounds. It then proves positivity of m_p_exp by unfolding and norm_num. The target inequality is rewritten by div_lt_iff₀ and abs_lt, after which both definitions are unfolded. The resulting two-sided inequality is discharged by a single nlinarith call on the two bounds from hb.

why it matters in Recognition Science

This theorem supplies the direct numerical verification that the phi-ladder mass formula matches the PDG proton value to the stated tolerance, thereby discharging the placeholder mass_ladder_assumption from Assumptions.lean. It sits inside the mass-prediction verification block that follows the phi-ladder construction in NumberTheory.PhiLadderLattice and the spacetime-emergence interval. Within the Recognition framework it instantiates the mass formula yardstick times phi to the (rung minus 8 plus gap) on the phi-ladder, confirming consistency with the self-similar fixed point phi after T6 and the eight-tick octave of T7. No open question is left; the result closes the assumption for the proton sector.

scope and limits

formal statement (Lean)

 308theorem proton_relative_error :
 309    |proton_binding_pred - m_p_exp| / m_p_exp < 0.035 := by

proof body

Tactic-mode proof.

 310  have hb := proton_mass_bounds
 311  have hexp_pos : (0 : ℝ) < m_p_exp := by unfold m_p_exp; norm_num
 312  rw [div_lt_iff₀ hexp_pos, abs_lt]
 313  unfold m_p_exp
 314  constructor <;> nlinarith [hb.1, hb.2]
 315
 316/-! ## Verification Supersedes mass_ladder_assumption
 317
 318The concrete interval-arithmetic bounds above replace the placeholder
 319`mass_ladder_assumption` from `Assumptions.lean`. The following theorem
 320provides the direct replacement: the phi-ladder model with geometry-derived
 321parameters matches PDG masses without any external assumption. -/
 322
 323/-- Direct verification that the phi-ladder model matches PDG to stated tolerances.
 324    This supersedes `Masses.mass_ladder_assumption`. -/

depends on (8)

Lean names referenced from this declaration's body.