Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 0803.1092 v1 pith:YWGWISJS submitted 2008-03-07 hep-lat

On the running of the bare coupling in SU(N) lattice gauge theories

classification hep-lat
keywords couplingschemelatticelambdaweakbarecalculatederror
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Interpreting the way that the SU(3) bare lattice coupling runs with the lattice spacing is complicated by the fact that there is a smooth cross-over region in which the strong coupling expansion transforms into a weak-coupling one. For N > 4, however, there is a first order bulk transition that cleanly separates the strong and weak coupling regimes. We find that in this case the calculated string tension can be readily fitted throughout the weak coupling region by a standard 3-loop expression modified by lattice spacing corrections of the expected form. While our fits demand the presence of the latter, they do not constrain the perturbative coupling scheme enough to enable us to extract a usefully accurate value of a(beta) in units of Lambda_MSbar. To resolve this ambiguity we turn to SU(3) where we use the Schrodinger Functional coupling scheme to extract a value of r_0 x Lambda_SF as a benchmark. We then find that the Parisi mean-field improved coupling scheme closely reproduces this result. We also develop a comparison between different schemes that does not rely on the calculation of any physical quantity and which can therefore be applied much further into weak coupling. Again the Parisi scheme is favoured over the others that we compare. Using the mean-field scheme we have fitted the values of the string tension that have been calculated for N=2 to N=8, to obtain Lambda_MSbar/sqrt(sigma) = 0.503(2)(40) + 0.33(3)(3)/N^2 for N > 2, where the first error is statistical and the second is our estimate of the systematic error from all sources.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Bootstrapping Pion Form Factors at Large $N$

    hep-th 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Bootstrap analysis of meromorphic observables in large-N QCD yields universal and SVZ-type bounds that constrain chiral Lagrangian parameters and link hadronic data to asymptotic freedom.

  2. The large-$N$ Yang--Mills $\Lambda$-parameter from step scaling

    hep-lat 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    First non-asymptotic-scaling determination of the large-N Yang-Mills Λ-parameter yields √(8t₀)Λ_MS(N=∞) = 0.639(36).